Span Associates, Law Firm

Span Associates, Law Firm Law firm with experienced partners and associates skilled to handle litigations, documentation work,

15/06/2023

சென்னை மெட்ரோ ரயில் ஊழல்….. விரைவில் வெளிக் கொணரப்படுகிறது.
அதனால் தான் சிபிஐ மீது தடை உத்தரவு…

15/11/2019

Today’s judgment

2015(3) CTC 1 : Ranganathan vs narayanan : limitation act 1963 section 3 : court can adjudicate issue of limitation even in absence of defence raised by defendant.

24/09/2019

Today’s

2009(2) SCC 570 : Roop Singh Negi vs Punjab National bank : The provisions of Indian Evidence Act are not applicable in a departmental proceeding.

14/09/2018

Today’s

#2014(3)CTC473 : Jayalakshmi Ammal vs kaliaperumal : object of pleadings is to give fair notice to other side as to nature of case . Tenability Of raising legal plea in arguments without pleadings , pure question of law can be raised without pleadings . Question of law not raised in pleadings can be entertained.

30/06/2018

Today’s Judgment

2017(1) DRTC 83 : state bank of India vs UJjal kumar Das : SARFAESI Act Sec 13(2) : as a matter of routine procedure one should not resort to publication of photographs of defaulters unless and until there are special circumstances where borrower with Mala fide intention committed Any of acts envisaged in RBI guidelines which would categorise him as a wilful defaulter.

04/06/2018

Today’s Judgment -

#1990(1)SCC536 : M/ S world wide agencies pvt ltd and another vs Mrs Margarat T desor and others : The decisions of English courts are not binding on courts in India but the observations or reasoning is of persuasive value.

Today’s judgment :-
24/05/2018

Today’s judgment :-

18/05/2018

#2008(4) CPJ 247 : MV J college of engineering vs Tukarant Rao : student paid full fees for studying in petitioner college for one year and has not attended the classes for a single day and sought refund of the fees to pursue the studies , order of the fora below ordering refund upheld

18/05/2018

#1999(6) SCC 548 : Vikash motors ltd vs Dr PK Jain : Where the opposite party had recieved the full price of a car and promised delivery period of 6 to 8 weeks this was clearly an unfair trade practice , it was held by the Supreme Court that demand of full price even before the car was ready for delivery would itself amount to an unfair trade practice

18/05/2018

#2010(4) CPJ 37 : new India insurance co ltd vs Haryana state agricultural marketing board : At the time of an accident the driver did not have a valid driving licence . His licence had expired on 13.2.95 and was renewed only on 18.9.95 and the accident had taken place on 2.7.95 . Insurance company not liable to pay the amount to the insured . Order of the fora below allowing relief to the respondent liable to be set aside

18/05/2018

#2008(4)CPJ176 : united India insurance co ltd vs Umesh Aangale : Sec 157 consumer protection act 1986 : Regarding name transfer of a vehicle , intimation not given to the Appellant - insurer , held that unless the policy is transferred in the name of the purchaser the latter cannot claim any compensation from the insurance company

22/04/2018

Today’s

1997(11) SCC 108 : Gian Chand Goel vs bar council of India : Sec 35&38 Advocate s Act 1961 : Where an Advocate had withdrawn the case without the instructions of party then misconduct is proved.

Address

New # 313, I Floor, Thambu Chetty Street
Chennai
600001.

Telephone

+917418811007

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Span Associates, Law Firm posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share