Sidhu & SRan SolicitoR's

Sidhu & SRan SolicitoR's Contact foR any legal queRies as well latest updates

26/07/2020
Atleast this isn't expected.
22/04/2018

Atleast this isn't expected.

Tutti yaari by inder chahal
09/04/2018

Tutti yaari by inder chahal

Presenting full video of latest punjabi song Tutti Yaari sung by Inder Chahal. The music of new punjabi song is given by Ranjha yaar while lyrics are penned ...

Don't pay oveR M.R.P. even in luxuRious hotels & RestauRents.
12/12/2017

Don't pay oveR M.R.P. even in luxuRious hotels & RestauRents.

Retired Justice C.S. Karnan, who is lodged in Presidency jail since June 21, has now filed a Petition before the Apex Co...
09/07/2017

Retired Justice C.S. Karnan, who is lodged in Presidency jail since June 21, has now filed a Petition before the Apex Court, seeking review of the order dated 9 May that had led to his imprisonment. Th Supreme Court has released it's detailed judgment on 5th July this month.

The Petition makes an attempt to justify the leveling of allegations against other Judges, distinguishing between a Judge and a Court, and contending that allegations against a Judge in his individual capacity has nothing to do with the Court itself. As against such allegations, he said, the Judges would only have a personal remedy of defamation available to them.

http://www.livelaw.in/breaking-sc-releases-judgment-dated-may-9-convicting-sentencing-justice-karnan-imprisonment/
He then goes on to demand that the veracity of the allegations be investigated, before proceeding against him, contending, “There is no reason to come to pre enquiry conclusion that the allegations are frivolous or malicious, that too when allegations are made out by the person holding constitutional post against the persons who holds similar positions and authorities. It is a prejudiced conclusion under which the instant proceedings are initiated. It weakens the institution of judiciary and gives further strength to the corrupt to perpetuate their corrupt practices, so that nobody is able to criticize great injustices dispensed by such persons of power.”

Mr. Karnan, thereafter, challenges the procedure adopted in the case at hand, and contends that it will lay down a wrong precedent. He contends that the Supreme Court is not vested with administrative or judicial supervision upon the High Courts, and hence, the Supreme Court’s interference in the present case was without jurisdiction.

He also highlights certain discrepancies in the date of pronouncement of the judgment, and submits, “The Petitioner’s case is no longer the case of an individual who has been convicted and sentenced to imprisonment without a charge sheet, without a trial, without even a judgment, but by a sentence where a reasoned judgment is yet to be delivered, but one concerning the very right of freedom of speech and expression, transparency and accountability in higher judiciary.”

Thereafter, demanding that the impugned orders be declared as unconstitutional and void, Mr. Karnan pleads, “There could be no parallel in the judicial history of any nation to the injustice meted out to the petitioner in the name of upholding the majesty and dignity of the institution of judiciary. The Review Petitioner, though would not ever claim to have never erred or being infallible, he could assert with clean conscience that as a judge and a citizen he had only one thing in mind, one dream, a judiciary which is independent, impartial, which is accountable to the people, for the people and is drawn from the diverse sections of the society.”

Mr. Karnan was arrested by the West Bengal Police from Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu on June 20, after having evaded arrest since May 9. This was in aftermath of an order passed on May 9, wherein the seven Judge SC Bench had sentenced him to 6 months in jail after finding him guilty of contempt of Court.

“On merits, we are of the considered view, that Sri Justice C.S. Karnan, has committed contempt of the judiciary. His actions constitute contempt of this Court, and of the judiciary of the gravest nature. Having found him guilty of committing contempt, we convict him accordingly. We are satisfied to punish him by sentencing him to imprisonment for six months. As a consequence, the contemnor shall not perform any administrative or judicial functions,” the seven Judge Bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar had then observed.

A reasoned judgment, which was released only recently, elaborated on the Bench’s unanimous decision. However, Justices J. Chelameswar and Ranjan Gogoi have, in their separate judgment, while agreeing with the Bench, introspected a bit over how the system led to his rise.

In Paragraph 26 of their judgments, the two Judges have observed: “This case, in our opinion, has importance extending beyond the immediate problem. This case highlights two things, (1) the need to revisit the process of selection and appointment of judges to the constitutional courts, for that matter any member of the judiciary at all levels; and (2) the need to set up appropriate legal regime to deal with situations where the conduct of a Judge of a constitutional court requires corrective measures – other than impeachment to be taken.”

In a detailed unanimous judgment released today, the Supreme Court bench of seven Judges including Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose who retired on May 27, has given detailed sequence of events and the reasons why it  found Justice Karnan of Calcutta High Court guilty of contempt of court, and sentenced…

18/05/2017

After six days of continous hearing, the constitution bench of the Supreme Court today reserved its verdict on several petitions which challenged the constitutional validity of triple talaq.

On the final day, representing several aggrieved women petitioners and womens rights organisations, advocates Anand Grover, Salman Khurshid, Arif Mohammad Khan and Indira Jaising vociferously demanded that triple talaq be declared illegal and unconstitutional.

The court also gave senior advocate Kapil Sibal for AIMPLB to counter the Centre's rebuttal yesterday. Responding to arguments of AIMPLB and all others who supported triple talaq, Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi for Centre in his rebuttal had said the issue the way it being portrayed is not of majority vs minority but of men vs women.

Rohatgi said, "Centre is ready to take a leap forward and bring in legislation. This matter is not a majority v minority. It's a tussle within the religion for rights of women".

"It's not 1400 years of custom but 1400 years of deprivation," he said while referring to AIMPLB counsel Sibal's statement yesterday that how can a 1400-year-old practice be branded unconstitutional.

Rohatgi asked Islam continues to thrive in Islamic countries who banished instant triple talaq. So is the practice integral to religion? “Ours is a secular Constitution. Fresh from horrors of Partition, our fathers kept core of all religions but subject to fundamental rights.

When the AG said the country had got rid of all objectionable practices like Sati, infanticide, Devadasi which were among the Hindus, CJTriplI Khehar reminded hhim that courts did not do it but they were done through legislation.

Address

Punjab & HaRyana High Court
Chandigarh
160036

Telephone

+918930730003

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Sidhu & SRan SolicitoR's posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share