The Law Codes

The Law Codes We are a team of the Best lawyers in Chandigarh having extensive knowledge and vast experience in the multiple disciplines of law.

Our association with the legal profession dates back to 1984, bringing immense value and legacy to our organization.

In a strongly worded opinion, the Supreme Court lamented that litigants frequently disobey court orders because courts a...
07/09/2023

In a strongly worded opinion, the Supreme Court lamented that litigants frequently disobey court orders because courts are lenient towards those found culpable of contempt of court proceedings and close such proceedings if the offenders subsequently apologise. Hiralal Somabhai Contractor vs. Balwantbhai Somabhai Bhandari

The bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra stated that such leniency teaches litigants how effective an apology can be as a weapon.

The bench opined that such leniency has actually emboldened unscrupulous litigants to disobey court orders or violate their agreements with impunity.

"With all the decorum at our disposal, we may take judicial notice of the fact that, over time, the courts have shown excessive leniency and magnanimity towards the transgressors. The bench added that there should not be a tendency for courts to show compassion when disobedience of an agreement or order is committed with impunity and full knowledge.

It also stated that courts should not take an apology if it is nothing more than a legal manoeuvre to evade responsibility, as this can diminish the prestige of the judiciary.

Read Full News: https://thelawcodes.com/news/leniency-of-courts-and-acceptance-of-apology-from-contemnors-causes-litigants-to-disobey-orders-supreme-court/

The Allahabad High Court ruled that a telephone conversation between two defendants cannot be excluded from evidence on ...
31/08/2023

The Allahabad High Court ruled that a telephone conversation between two defendants cannot be excluded from evidence on the basis that it was unlawfully obtained. [Mahant Prasad Ram Tripathi @ M.P.R. Tripathi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh through CBI/A.C.B., Lucknow and Others]

Justice Subhash Vidyarthi made the remark while affirming a lower court's decision not to release an accused in a bribery case who was implicated in the case based on a recorded phone conversation.

The defendant had challenged the admissibility of the phone conversation on the grounds that it had been unlawfully obtained. However, the court denied his appeal.

Read Full News: https://thelawcodes.com/news/recorded-phone-conversation-admissible-even-if-obtained-illegally-allahabad-high-court/


Due to the fact that both parents were fighting for custody of the child, the High Court determined that there was no on...
30/08/2023

Due to the fact that both parents were fighting for custody of the child, the High Court determined that there was no one to defend the child's best interests.

A division bench composed of Justices A Muhamed Mustaque and Sophy Thomas was reviewing the petition for custody of the youngest child filed by the father (petitioner).

The petitioner was a practising attorney with three children from a previous marriage.

The father was given possession of the first two children after the family court determined that their maternal grandfather had molested both of them.

Read Full News: https://thelawcodes.com/news/a-separate-lawyer-appointed-to-represent-a-child-in-custody-battle-by-kerala-high-court/

The Central Government argued that Jammu and Kashmir's status as a Union Territory is only temporary and that its stateh...
29/08/2023

The Central Government argued that Jammu and Kashmir's status as a Union Territory is only temporary and that its statehood will be restored, whereas Ladakh will remain a Union Territory. [In reference to Constitutional Article 370]

A Constitution Bench consisting of Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud and Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, and Surya Kant requested an official statement from the Central government outlining the roadmap and timeline for restoring the statehood of Jammu & Kashmir.

"We require a statement from the federal government indicating if there is a timetable in mind for this matter. Our nation's survival depends on the restoration of democracy. CJI Chandrachud pleaded, "Please outline the next steps in this process."

Read Full News: https://thelawcodes.com/news/union-territory-status-for-jammu-and-kashmir-wont-last-forever-supreme-court/

Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud stated today that he allows female law clerks to work from home when they ex...
26/08/2023

Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud stated today that he allows female law clerks to work from home when they experience menstrual-related health issues.

The CJI stated that he allows female law employees to work from home if they are experiencing menstrual cramps.

"Last year, four out of five law clerks were female. It is not uncommon for them to call and say, "Sir, I have menstrual cramps." I encourage them to work from home and take care of their health. We have also installed sanitary napkin dispensers in the Supreme Court of India's female restrooms, he said.

At the 31st annual convocation of the National Law School of India University in Bengaluru, the Chief Justice of India spoke.

The judge also addressed the dilemma law school graduates confront when deciding on a career path.

Instead of rushing to choose a specific path in law, he suggested that students investigate all possible paths within the discipline.

Read Full New: https://thelawcodes.com/news/women-law-clerks-allowed-to-work-from-home-during-menstrual-cycles-cji-dy-chandrachud/

"A housewife has a multitude of responsibilities that encompass a variety of duties. From managing domestic chores to cu...
25/08/2023

"A housewife has a multitude of responsibilities that encompass a variety of duties. From managing domestic chores to cultivating relationships and preserving a harmonious living environment, their duties are nonstop and demanding. The commitment of a homemaker is indisputable, as she works nonstop around the clock. "The contribution of a housewife to the intricate fabric of daily life is immeasurable and merits profound recognition," stated the Court.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court recently stated that a homemaker's contributions cannot be quantified while increasing the widow's compensation [Dayawanti vs. Arjun and Others].

Justice Sanjay Vashishth remarked that a housewife has numerous responsibilities that comprise a wide variety of duties.

The commitment of housewives is indisputable, and their contributions to the intricate fabric of daily life must be recognised, the judge added.

Read Full News: https://thelawcodes.com/news/contributions-of-homemakers-are-immeasurable-punjab-and-haryana-high-court/

The Delhi High Court ruled on Monday that under Section 34 of the 1996 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, courts may set ...
24/08/2023

The Delhi High Court ruled on Monday that under Section 34 of the 1996 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, courts may set aside a portion of an arbitral award if that portion is susceptible of being severable or validly severed from the remainder. Trichy Thanjavur Motorway Ltd vs.

Justice Yashwant Varma observed that the 1996 Act's proviso to Section 34(2)(a)(iv) already acknowledged that arbitral awards may sometimes be severable. Such accolades may be partially revoked (or partially maintained).

As a result, he ruled that a partial annulment of arbitral awards is not limited to the scenarios outlined in Section 34(2)(a), but can be applied to all scenarios outlined in Section 34.

Read Full New: https://thelawcodes.com/news/severable-arbitral-awards-can-be-partly-set-aside-under-section-34-of-the-arbitration-act-delhi-high-court/

The Punjab & Haryana High Court recently fined a cohabiting couple 10,000 for filing an application for police protectio...
21/08/2023

The Punjab & Haryana High Court recently fined a cohabiting couple 10,000 for filing an application for police protection in the absence of a clear danger to their life or liberty.

During an earlier hearing on the petition, Justice Alok Jain clarified that if the State determined that there was no perceived threat to the petitioners, they would be responsible for 50,000 in court costs. In the absence of any such danger, the Court ruled,

"It was made explicit on the very first date that if it is determined that the petitioners do not perceive a threat, they will be required to pay a minimum of Rs. 50,000/-. Today, however, the petitioners' counsel requests the withdrawal of the current petition and a reduction in costs. Therefore, the present petition is dismissed, subject to the petitioners' payment of Rs. 10,000/- within one month of today..."

Read Full News: https://thelawcodes.com/news/the-punjab-and-haryana-high-court-imposes-a-10000-fee-on-cohabitants-seeking-protection-in-the-absence-of-a-life-threatening-situation/

The Supreme Court objected to the Gujarat High Court's handling of a case in which a 26-week expectant r**e survivor sou...
20/08/2023

The Supreme Court objected to the Gujarat High Court's handling of a case in which a 26-week expectant r**e survivor sought an abortion. [XYZ vs. Gujarat State]

A bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan observed that a substantial amount of time had been lost due to the High Court's initial decision to adjourn the case.

"Why was the issue postponed until August 23? How can the Court state that the report is due on August 10 and then post it thirteen days later? How much precious time was wasted? ... In such cases, there must be a sense of urgency, and a lackadaisical attitude is unacceptable, Justice Nagarathna stated.

This aspect was also reflected in the order issued by the Supreme Court.

Read Full News: https://thelawcodes.com/news/casual-approach-of-gujarat-hc-towards-r**e-survivors-plea-to-terminate-pregnancy-criticised-by-the-apex-court/

The Supreme Court issued an order regarding the appointment of support personnel under the POCSO Act and their qualifica...
19/08/2023

The Supreme Court issued an order regarding the appointment of support personnel under the POCSO Act and their qualifications. The Court issued directives for the formulation of appointment guidelines.

It is important to note that the POCSO Rules, 2020 define a'support person' as "someone assigned by a child welfare committee to assist a child during the investigation and trial process, or any other person assisting a child pre-trial or during the trial process for offences under the POCSO Act, 2012."

The bench of Justices S Ravindra Bhat and Justice Aravind Kumar was hearing a petition filed by Bachpan Bachao Andolan, which raised concerns regarding the protection offered to victims under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Read Full News: https://thelawcodes.com/news/importance-of-support-persons-emphasized-by-the-apex-court-for-pocso-victims-issues-guidelines/

The Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, announced this morning that the Supreme Court has compiled a "Handbook on co...
18/08/2023

The Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, announced this morning that the Supreme Court has compiled a "Handbook on combating Gender Stereotypes" to identify and eliminate the use of words and phrases that are laden with gender stereotypes in court decisions and court language.

"This is intended to assist judges and the legal community in identifying, comprehending, and combating gender stereotypes in legal discourse. It includes a glossary of gender-biased terms and suggests alternative words and phrases for use in crafting pleadings, orders, and judgements. It is for solicitors and justices'', stated the CJI.

Read Full News: https://thelawcodes.com/news/the-supreme-court-issues-a-guide-to-prevent-the-use-of-gender-stereotypes-in-opinions-and-pleadings/

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court, comprised of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and Pankaj Mithal, ruled while hearing a num...
17/08/2023

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court, comprised of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and Pankaj Mithal, ruled while hearing a number of appeals, "Public interest need not remain exclusively limited to ensuring maximal revenue accrual for the Government. Instead, the public interest encompasses, but is not limited to, a fair, transparent, and stable procedure that all executive actions must adhere to."

The challenge in these appeals was to the judgement and order dated 13.02.2019 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, whereby the writ petitions filed by the respective parties were allowed, and the Division Bench of the High Court struck down the decision by the Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (HSIIDC) to conduct manual auction from the stage of the end of e-auction.

Read Full News: https://thelawcodes.com/news/public-interest-includes-fair-and-transparent-process-not-limited-to-maximising-govt-revenue-supreme-court/

Address

#624, Sector 16-D
Chandigarh
160015

Opening Hours

Monday 10am - 8pm
Tuesday 10am - 8pm
Wednesday 10am - 8pm
Thursday 10am - 8pm
Friday 10am - 8pm
Saturday 10am - 8pm
Sunday 10am - 5pm

Telephone

+919815016624

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Law Codes posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to The Law Codes:

Share

Category