Chhatisgarh Lawyers

05/06/2020

Ratanlal v/s Prahlad jat CRL-A 499/14 15/09/17 [ ABDUL NAZEER JJ ]

Section 311 CRPC

Re examination Object of the provision as a whole is to do justice not only from the point of view of the accused and the prosecution but also from the point of view of an orderly society - This power is to be exercised only for strong and valid reasons and it should be exercised with caution and circumspection - Recall is not a matter of course and discretion given to the Court has to be exercised judicially to prevent failure of justice - Reasons for exercising this power should be spelt out in the order

17/05/2020

Section 125(4) CRPC Maintenance to deserted wife Once relationship of marriage comes to end, woman obviously is not under any obligation to live with her former husband Deeming fiction of divorced wife being treated as a wife can only be read for limited purpose for grant of maintenance and deeming fiction cannot be stretched to illogical extent that divorced wife is under a compulsion to live with the ex-husband Husband cannot urge that he can divorce his wife on ground that she has deserted him and then deny maintenance which should otherwise be payable to her on ground that even after divorce she is not willing to live with him.[Para 8]

Dr. Swapan Kumar Banerjee v/s State of West Bengal CRL-A 233/2015

[ SUPREME COURT ].

11/05/2020

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Yogesh Kumar Pandey vs. Swati Pandey

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(1)(1b) Divorce petition by husband for Desertion Husband proved the separation and social meeting in which wife agreed to return to nuptial home, but not complete matters discussed in said meeting Held, husband is guilty of concealing facts Desertion not proved Impugned judgment upheld Appeal dismissed*

07/05/2020

Section 125 CRPC Maintenance Family Court allowed claim of wife and child and it is Revision petition by the husband Wife alleged husband is doing business of Building material supplier, owning truck, tractor etc and earning Rs.50000/- per month Husband alleged, he is a patient of an illness, all the assets in his name had been given away and it is his parents who are looking him after -- family Court granted Rs.10000/- maintenance Held, no material about necessity of husband to sell his properties They had been gifted to own brothers What was the necessity is not written Court below rightly presumed, to defeat maintenance claim, the properties had been disposed of Impugned order upheld Revision petition dismissed*

21/04/2020

• 0RDER .23.RULE.1(3) CPC permission to file fresh suit on the same subject matter -Defendant can object to such prayer made by plaintiff-In such event, it is for Court to decide as to whether permission to seek withdrawal of suit should be granted to plaintiff and if so on what terms. (Para 26)

Anil Kumar v/s Vijay Pal CA 2007/17 30/11/17 [ RK AGRAWAL JJ ]

[ SUPREME COURT ]

21/04/2020

Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, S.23, Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens (Amendment) Rules, 2017, S.22(3)(1)(i)-Property of senior citizen- Eviction petition against daughter-in-law Daughter-in-law has no right, title and interest in suit property Relationship between senior citizen and his wife with daughter-in-law have deteriorated, thus parties cannot be insisted on residing with daughter-in-law- Daughter-in-law rightly evicted

Darshna V. Govt Of NCT Of Delhi LPA 537/18 3/10/18 [RAJENDRA MENON C.J. & V.KAMSWAR RAO J]

DELHI HIGH COURT

17/04/2020

- Sections.302, 201 IPC Double murder - Circumstantial evide Deceased and her daughter found dead in their room with burn injuries- Medical evidence shows that death occurred due to strangulation-Room where incident seurd were oecupied by deceased, her daughterand her husband/accused-However, theere is ao evidence on record that accused was at or around his residence at relevant time None of PWs supported demand of dowry and harassment -No evidence on record prwing guit of accused-Accused acquitted. Canes neferred (Paras 9, 10, 13 & 15)

State of Rajasthan v/s Ramanand CRl-A 357/08 [ ADARASH KUMAR JJ ]

[ SUPREME COURT

17/04/2020

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2527021100883138&id=1590241051227819?sfnsn=wiwspwa&extid=WmBFAoXiOaruIWza&d=w&vh=e

16/04/2020

कभी पुलिसकर्मियों पर पथराव,,,तो कभी डॉक्टरों पर थूकना,,और अब मीडियाकर्मी के पुत्र पर हमला,,,ऐसे लोगो के खिलाफ देशद्रोह का मामला होना चाहिए दर्ज

देश मे लॉक डाउन के दौरान डॉक्टर,पुलिसकर्मी,और मीडियाकर्मी अपनी जान की परवाह करे बिना ड्यूटी कर रहें है और लोगों को घरों में रहने हिदायत दे रहे है जिससे इस घातक महामारी से लड़ा जा सके।

जहाँ एक तरफ लोगो को धारा 144 और लॉकडाउन का पालन कराने पुलिसकर्मी चौक चौराहों में मुस्तैद है तो वही दूसरी तरफ डाक्टर भी कोरोना संक्रमितों का इलाज करने दिन रात एक कर रहे है न खाने का ठिकाना न घर जाने समय यही हाल मीडियाकर्मियों का भी है जो अपने परिवार की परवाह किए बिना, आमजन तक सही जानकारी पहुंचाने अपने कर्तव्यों का पालन रहे है। ये सिर्फ इस लिए ड्यूटी कर रहे ताकि सभी अपने परिवार के साथ घर मे सुरक्षित रह सकें।

क्या ये इंसान नही क्या इन्हें अपने परिवार की चिंता नही अगर ये सब भी अपनी ड्यूटी छोड़ कर घर मे बैठ जाए तो ज़रा सोचिए क्या होगा? शर्म आनी चाहिए ऐसे लोगों को जो पुलिसकर्मियों के ऊपर पथराव करते है और डॉक्टरों के ऊपर थूक रहे है। पर हद तो तब हो गई जब एक युवक को कुछ लोग इस लिए बेरहमी से पिट दिए कि उसका पिता न्यूज़ कवर करने जाता है। जिससे कोरोना संक्रमण फैल सकता है।

पुलिस पर पथराव,डॉक्टरों पर थूकना और मीडियाकर्मियों के साथ ही उनके परिवार पर हमला करने वाले लोगों के खिलाफ देशद्रोह का अपराध दर्ज होना चाहिए। क्योकि इनके द्वारा किया गया कृत्य कतई माफी के लायक नही है। इस घोर आपदा के वक्त अपने घर परिवार का मोह त्याग ये लोग सिर्फ देशवासियों की रक्षा के लिए अदृश्य दुश्मन को परास्त करने में लगे है उनके साथ ऐसा बर्ताव इंसानियत को शर्मसार कर देने वाली घटना है

11/04/2020

0rder .41.Rule .27 CPC Additional evidence at appellate stage- Documents sought to be produced by way of additional evidence i.e notification issued under Land Acquisition Act, were relevant and also necessary for deciding rights of parties involved in suit - These documents did not require any proof being public documents in nature - Moreover, defendant already made reference of these documents and laid foundation in pleadings- More so, explanation given by defendant for not filing documents earlier, which was accepted by High Court Application rightly allowed.

19/07/2017

Find the Best Lawyers in Chhatisgarh, Bilaspur

Get legal advice by Advocate Mr. Avijit Sinha for cases such as crimnal, civil, company law, matrimonial, domestic violence and etc. contact us 9891124296