07/02/2026
If judicial pronouncements on a topic are examined, they will generate an erratic graph. It's time to grow. It is interesting to reflect on the manner in which cricket umpires and their ability to decide in the game of cricket have progressed. There were times when a decision of cricket umpires was correct or wrong was not even probed. It was accepted and the player would walk out. Then started the period of protest. Thereafter advent of television brought in a situation wherein spectators could see that the decision of the umpire was wrong, however could not do anything. Then came the review system using replays, and it developed to where it is now. Progress similar to what happened in cricket umpiring can be implemented in the judiciary. Certain facts which can be ascertained by digital display from the actuals should be used wherever it can be to ascertain the actuals. Instead of inferring from documents and pleadings.
Send a message to learn more