A & G Law Associates

A & G Law Associates Advocate for Civil, Criminal and Taxation, CAT, KAT, Consumer dispute and Labour dispute.

Stamp Duty Must Reflect Auction Price, Not Artificial Market Value: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rebukes Sub-Registrar for ...
05/05/2025

Stamp Duty Must Reflect Auction Price, Not Artificial Market Value: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rebukes Sub-Registrar for Illegal Demand Read -

“The Sub-Registrar has no other option but to register the sale certificates by fixing the stamp duty based on the successful bid price… the same reflects the true market value as per settled law.”- In a categorical reaffirmation of settled legal principle, the Andhra Pradesh High Court delive...

18/03/2025
*ಪೊಲೀಸ್ ಠಾಣೆಯ ಪ್ರತಿ ಕೋಣೆಯಲ್ಲೂ ಸಿಸಿಟಿವಿ ಕ್ಯಾಮರಾ ಕಡ್ಡಾಯ: ಹೈಕೋರ್ಟ್‌*https://www.courtbeatnews.com/2024/10/cctv-must-in-all-...
03/11/2024

*ಪೊಲೀಸ್ ಠಾಣೆಯ ಪ್ರತಿ ಕೋಣೆಯಲ್ಲೂ ಸಿಸಿಟಿವಿ ಕ್ಯಾಮರಾ ಕಡ್ಡಾಯ: ಹೈಕೋರ್ಟ್‌*

https://www.courtbeatnews.com/2024/10/cctv-must-in-all-rooms-of-police-station.html

Follow this link to join my WhatsApp group: https://chat.whatsapp.com/EaYyHdnzFe13b0qplFkYqT

court news Govt order/ Notification ಪೊಲೀಸ್ ಠಾಣೆಯ ಪ್ರತಿ ಕೋಣೆಯಲ್ಲೂ ಸಿಸಿಟಿವಿ ಕ್ಯಾಮರಾ ಕಡ್ಡಾಯ: ಹೈಕೋರ್ಟ್‌ Thursday, October 31, 2024 ಪೊಲೀಸ್ ಠಾಣೆಯ ಪ್ರತಿ ಕೋಣೆ...

Not Understandable How Shouting 'Jai Sriram' Outrages Religious Feelings: Karnataka High Court Quashes Case
16/10/2024

Not Understandable How Shouting 'Jai Sriram' Outrages Religious Feelings: Karnataka High Court Quashes Case

Quashing a case against two men accused of an offence under

25/09/2022

NO FIR AGAINST A ADVOCATE OR DOCTOR - SC

In an important decision Hon'ble Supreme Court of India said, that if the advise of a lawyer and Doctors goes wrong in some way, even than no case under section 420 IPC or something like that can be registered against him/her. Though Supreme Court also said that Lawyer and Doctors should take care of the interests of his/her clients.(Justice P. Sthasivam and Justice Ranjan Gogoi bench)
Court also said that in professions like lawyers and doctors, the professionals cannot guarantee for the success of the case. Courts said that the advocate cannot provide guarantee to his/her client that he would definitely win the case and nor doctor can tell his patient that is operations are always successful. And though this professions doctor and lawyer can only say that they are experienced in their work and they would do their best efforts so that they are successful.

http://www.pathlegal.in/No-FIR-against-a-advocate-or-doctor---SC---legalnewscopied-728741

Very good judgement for Doctors and Advocates. Please circulate it as widely as possible among your Doctor and Advocate friends.

19/09/2022

A person in a consensual physical relationship is not required to judicially scrutinise the date of birth of his partner, the Delhi High Court has said while granting bail to a man accused of "ra**ng" his alleged minor partner who has "three different dates of birth", according to official documents. The court said a person is not required to see the Aadhaar card or the PAN card or verify his partner's date of birth from her school records before getting into a consensual physical relationship with her and granted relief to the accused who claimed that the prosecutrix was giving her dates of birth in accordance with her own convenience only to invoke the provisions of the child abuse law against him

"The person, who is in a consensual physical relationship with another person, is not required to judicially scrutinise the date of birth of the other person. He is not required to see the Aadhaar card, the PAN card and verify the date of birth from her school records before he enters into a physical relationship.

"The very fact that there is an Aadhaar card and that the same shows the date of birth as 01.01.1998 is sufficient for the applicant to form an opinion that he was not indulging in a physical relationship with a minor," Justice Jasmeet Singh said in the order dated August 24.

"As regards the date of birth, it seems the prosecutrix has three different dates of birth. The Aadhaar card shows her date of birth as 01.01.1998 and hence, on the date of the alleged incident, the prosecutrix was supposed to be a major," the judge added.

*x

FIR U/S 377 IPC Can Be Quashed In Matrimonial Cases After Settlement Between Parties: Delhi High Court
15/09/2022

FIR U/S 377 IPC Can Be Quashed In Matrimonial Cases After Settlement Between Parties: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has observed that in matrimonial cases where settlement has taken place, off

Address

Bangalore

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when A & G Law Associates posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to A & G Law Associates:

Share

Category