KJLegal

20/01/2022

When Defendant's Trademark Is Identical To Plaintiff's Registered Trademark & Their Goods Or Services Are Identical, Confusion In Public Shall Be Presumed : Supreme Court

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-registered-trademark-infringement-identical-enquiry-confusion-in-public-189867

Looking for legal news and events. Download Livelaw app, India's no:1 Legal news app.

http://onelink.to/bxd89a

When the onelink URL is not registered to an account, fallback links will not to be automatic. This is a security measure to deter uninteded use of the onelink.to service.

07/01/2022

Rooh Afza v Dil Afza trademark war: Delhi High Court says sharbat lovers can distinguish between the two |

The Delhi High Court dismissed an application filed by the manufacturers of Rooh Afza seeking an injunction on the sale of Dil Afza.

17/09/2021

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/emami-gets-edge-in-trademark-case-against-dr-morepen/articleshow/86181279.cms

India Business News: Kolkata: FMCG major Emami on Monday has got a favourable order on a trademark violation suit against Dr.

07/07/2021

ℍ𝕠𝕟'𝕓𝕝𝕖 𝕊𝕦𝕡𝕣𝕖𝕞𝕖 ℂ𝕠𝕦𝕣𝕥 :
𝔽𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕠𝕗 ℂ𝕒𝕧𝕖𝕒𝕥 𝔹𝕪 𝕀𝕥𝕤𝕖𝕝𝕗 𝔻𝕠𝕖𝕤 ℕ𝕠𝕥 𝔼𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕥𝕝𝕖 ℂ𝕒𝕧𝕖𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕤 𝕋𝕠 𝔹𝕖 𝕋𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕥𝕖𝕕 𝔸𝕤 𝔸 ℙ𝕒𝕣𝕥𝕪 𝕋𝕠 𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕖𝕖𝕕𝕚𝕟𝕘. '𝕋𝕙𝕖𝕪 𝕠𝕟𝕝𝕪 𝕘𝕖𝕥 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕣𝕚𝕘𝕙𝕥 𝕠𝕗 𝕓𝕖𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕟𝕠𝕥𝕚𝕗𝕚𝕖𝕕 𝕠𝕗 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕝𝕠𝕕𝕘𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕠𝕗 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕊𝕃ℙ𝕤.'

𝙃𝙤𝙣'𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝘾𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙩 𝙝𝙚𝙡𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙁𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝘾𝙖𝙫𝙚𝙖𝙩 𝙗𝙮 𝙞𝙩𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙛 𝙙𝙤𝙚𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙫𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙗𝙚 𝙩𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙨 𝙖 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙮 𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙘𝙚𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙪𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙢𝙚 𝘾𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙩 𝙤𝙗𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙚𝙙.

𝙃𝙤𝙣'𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙅𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝘼𝙣𝙞𝙧𝙪𝙙𝙙𝙝𝙖 𝘽𝙤𝙨𝙚 𝙤𝙗𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙪𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙞𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖 𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙖 𝙤𝙛 𝘾𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝙄𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙣 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙎𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝘼𝙨𝙨𝙤𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙤 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙚𝙣𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙖 𝙎𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙇𝙚𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙋𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙩𝙝 𝙤𝙛 𝙘𝙖𝙫𝙚𝙖𝙩 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙡𝙤𝙙𝙜𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙢. 𝙃𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘼𝙨𝙨𝙤𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙝𝙖𝙙 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙛𝙞𝙡𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙧 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙗𝙚𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙃𝙞𝙜𝙝 𝘾𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙩, 𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙚.

𝙒𝙝𝙞𝙡𝙚 𝙖𝙨 𝙘𝙖𝙫𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙗𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙣𝙤𝙩𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙚𝙙 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙤𝙙𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙇𝙋𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝘾𝙡𝙖𝙪𝙨𝙚 2 𝙤𝙛 𝙊𝙧𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙓𝙑 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙪𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙢𝙚 𝘾𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙩 𝙍𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙨, 2013, 𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙛𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝙘𝙖𝙫𝙚𝙖𝙩 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙢 𝙖𝙣 𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙮 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙤 𝙖 𝙋𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙎𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙇𝙚𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝘼𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙡. 𝙁𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝘾𝙖𝙫𝙚𝙖𝙩 𝙗𝙮 𝙞𝙩𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙛 𝙙𝙤𝙚𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙢 𝙩𝙤 𝙗𝙚 𝙩𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙨 𝙖 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙮 𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙘𝙚𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜.", 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙟𝙪𝙙𝙜𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙞𝙙 𝙬𝙝𝙞𝙡𝙚 𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙢 𝙡𝙞𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙮 𝙩𝙤 𝙛𝙞𝙡𝙚 𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣.

𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙃𝙤𝙣'𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝘾𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙩 𝙖𝙡𝙨𝙤 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙛𝙞𝙡𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙛𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙨𝙚𝙩𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙤𝙛𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙗𝙚𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙄𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙣 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙎𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙞𝙘𝙚 (𝙄𝙋𝙎). 𝙎𝙇𝙋𝙨 𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙨𝙚 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙖 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙢𝙤𝙣 𝙅𝙪𝙙𝙜𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙙𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙖 𝘿𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝘽𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙝 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘿𝙚𝙡𝙝𝙞 𝙃𝙞𝙜𝙝 𝘾𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙩 𝙞𝙣 𝙛𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙬𝙧𝙞𝙩 𝙥𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙗𝙧𝙤𝙪𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙗𝙮 𝙂𝙧𝙤𝙪𝙥 𝘼 𝙤𝙛𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘾𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝙄𝙣𝙙𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙎𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙘𝙚 (𝘾𝙄𝙎𝙁), 𝘾𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝙍𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙚 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙘𝙚 (𝘾𝙍𝙋𝙁), 𝙄𝙣𝙙𝙤 𝙏𝙞𝙗𝙚𝙩𝙖𝙣 𝘽𝙤𝙧𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙚 (𝙄𝙏𝘽𝙋), 𝘽𝙤𝙧𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙎𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙘𝙚 (𝘽𝙎𝙁) 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙎𝙖𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙖 𝙎𝙚𝙚𝙢𝙖 𝘽𝙖𝙡 (𝙎𝙎𝘽).

𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙃𝙤𝙣'𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝘾𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙩 𝙨𝙖𝙞𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙨 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙢𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙨𝙪𝙛𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙪𝙡𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙤𝙪𝙩𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙡.

𝙄𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙪𝙜𝙣𝙚𝙙 𝙟𝙪𝙙𝙜𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙃𝙞𝙜𝙝 𝘾𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙙 𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙪𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙙𝙞𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨: (𝙄) 𝘽𝙮 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙝 𝘾𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝘼𝙧𝙢𝙚𝙙 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙘𝙚 𝙩𝙤, 𝙞𝙛 𝙨𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙨𝙞𝙧𝙚, 𝙢𝙖𝙠𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙝𝙚𝙣𝙨𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣(𝙨) 𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙈𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙃𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝘼𝙛𝙛𝙖𝙞𝙧𝙨, 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙖𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙍𝙚𝙘𝙧𝙪𝙞𝙩𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙍𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙝 𝘾𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝘼𝙧𝙢𝙚𝙙 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙘𝙚 𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙡𝙪𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙦𝙪𝙖 𝘾𝙖𝙙𝙧𝙚 𝙎𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚, 𝙍𝙚𝙨𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙮, 𝘿𝙚𝙥𝙪𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙚𝙩𝙘. (𝙄𝙄) 𝘽𝙮 𝙙𝙞𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙈𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙃𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝘼𝙛𝙛𝙖𝙞𝙧𝙨 𝙩𝙤, 𝙞𝙣 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘿𝙤𝙋𝙏 𝙊𝙈𝙨 𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 31𝙨𝙩 𝘿𝙚𝙘𝙚𝙢𝙗𝙚𝙧, 2010 𝙖𝙣𝙙 8𝙩𝙝 𝙈𝙖𝙮, 2018, 𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙡𝙮 𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙚𝙭𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙞𝙨𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙧𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙚𝙬 𝙤𝙛 𝙚𝙭𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙍𝙚𝙘𝙧𝙪𝙞𝙩𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙍𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙝 𝘾𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝘼𝙧𝙢𝙚𝙙 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙘𝙚, 𝙖𝙡𝙨𝙤 𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙤 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣(𝙨), 𝙞𝙛 𝙖𝙣𝙮, 𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙚𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙙 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘾𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝘼𝙧𝙢𝙚𝙙 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙘𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙖𝙛𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙜𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙢 𝙖𝙣 𝙤𝙥𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙗𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙘𝙚 𝙞𝙩𝙨 𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙧𝙚𝙜𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙗𝙚𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘿𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙤𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙡 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙏𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜. (𝙄𝙄𝙄) 𝘽𝙮 𝙙𝙞𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘿𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙤𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙡 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙏𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙤, 𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙡𝙮 𝙤𝙣 𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙚𝙞𝙥𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙈𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙃𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝘼𝙛𝙛𝙖𝙞𝙧𝙨 𝙦𝙪𝙖 𝙧𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙚𝙬 𝙤𝙛 𝙍𝙚𝙘𝙧𝙪𝙞𝙩𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙍𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝘾𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝘼𝙧𝙢𝙚𝙙 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙘𝙚𝙨, 𝙩𝙖𝙠𝙚 𝙣𝙚𝙘𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙖𝙧𝙮 𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙤𝙣; (𝙄𝙑) 𝘽𝙮 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙢𝙖𝙠𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙝𝙚𝙣𝙨𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣(𝙨) 𝙦𝙪𝙖 𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙝 𝘾𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝘼𝙧𝙢𝙚𝙙 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙘𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘿𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙤𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙡 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙏𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜, 𝙦𝙪𝙖 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘾𝙖𝙙𝙧𝙚 𝙍𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙚𝙬 𝙙𝙪𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧 2021 𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙡𝙪𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙧𝙚𝙛𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙞𝙛 𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙤𝙛. (𝙑) 𝘽𝙮 𝙙𝙞𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘿𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙤𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙡 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙏𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙤 𝙚𝙣𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚𝙡𝙮 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝘾𝙖𝙙𝙧𝙚 𝙍𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙚𝙬 𝙚𝙭𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙞𝙨𝙚 𝙙𝙪𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧 2021 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙤, 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙧𝙚𝙛𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙦𝙪𝙖 𝘾𝙖𝙙𝙧𝙚 𝙍𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙚𝙬 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝘾𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝘼𝙧𝙢𝙚𝙙 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙘𝙚𝙨, 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙤𝙧𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣(𝙨), 𝙞𝙛 𝙖𝙣𝙮, 𝙢𝙖𝙙𝙚 𝙗𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙝 𝘾𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝘼𝙧𝙢𝙚𝙙 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙘𝙚, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙈𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙃𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝘼𝙛𝙛𝙖𝙞𝙧𝙨 𝙦𝙪𝙖 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙚𝙬 𝙤𝙛 𝙍𝙚𝙘𝙧𝙪𝙞𝙩𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙍𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙝 𝘾𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝘼𝙧𝙢𝙚𝙙 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙁𝙤𝙧. (𝙑𝙄) 𝘽𝙮 𝙙𝙞𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙧𝙚 𝙚𝙭𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙞𝙨𝙚 𝙖𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙖𝙞𝙙 𝙗𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙘𝙡𝙪𝙙𝙚𝙙 𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙧 𝙗𝙚𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚 30𝙩𝙝 𝙅𝙪𝙣𝙚, 2021.

𝘾𝙖𝙨𝙚:

𝙎𝙖𝙣𝙟𝙖𝙮 𝙋𝙧𝙖𝙠𝙖𝙨𝙝 𝙑𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙪𝙨 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙄𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙖.

𝘾𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙢:

𝙃𝙤𝙣'𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙅𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝘼𝙣𝙞𝙧𝙪𝙙𝙙𝙝𝙖 𝘽𝙤𝙨𝙚.

16/06/2021

KSRTC trademark row set to deepen as Karnataka dismisses Kerala RTC's claim

After a seven-year legal battle for the trademark, Kerala claims it has been given the right to use the abbreviation KSRTC. Karnataka has said it has not yet received the order. What now?

16/06/2021

PepsiCo slaps Parle Agro with trademark infringement suit over tagline…

​​'For the Bold' is a registered trademark for the Doritos nacho chips brand globally, the US beverage and packaged food multinational argued in its petition filed in the Delhi High Court earlier this month. PepsiCo has pleaded the court to restrain the Mumbai-based beverages company from "infri...

25/04/2021

World Intellectual Property Rights Day aims to celebrate creativity and the contribution that is made by creators and innovators to the development of societies across the globe. The World Intellectual Property Day has been established by the World Intellectual Property Organisation and is celebrated on April 26 since the year 2000.

15/02/2021

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/patents-cases-may-soon-go-to-courts-as-govt-plans-to-dismantle-five-tribunals/articleshow/80916049.cms

India News: All disputes and appeals concerning intellectual property protection including patents and trademarks, in the fields of technology, engineering, pharm.

22/01/2021

https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2021/jan/21/four-held-in-surat-for-selling-wheat-flour-using-reliance-jio-logo-2253247.html

The police on Wednesday arrested the accused from a trading company and booked them under relevant sections of Trade Marks Act of 1999, inspector A N Jani of Sachin police station said.

22/12/2020

What's In A Name?: The Need For The Government To Take IPR Seriously

https://www.livelaw.in/columns/the-need-for-the-government-to-take-ipr-seriously-166609

Looking for legal news and events. Download Livelaw app, India's no:1 Legal news app.

http://onelink.to/bxd89a

22/12/2020

Court Issues Notice To Serum Institute Of India On Suit Against Use Of Name 'COVISHIELD' For Proposed Vaccine

https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/serum-institute-of-india-sii-covishield-covid-trademark-suit-vaccine-167166

Looking for legal news and events. Download Livelaw app, India's no:1 Legal news app.

http://onelink.to/bxd89a

21/12/2020

https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/trademark-infringment-bombay-high-court-restrains-aristo-apparels-from-using-sero

The Bombay High Court has passed an interim order of injunction against Aristo Apparels restraining them from using the Savla Corporation’s trademark “SERO” or any derivatives containing the "SERO" mark on men’s apparel