02/02/2026
Last week I wrote about the DAZN case that has thrown a bit of a spanner into the works for lawyers and businesses regarding pre-contractual communications and whether they can bind a person, even if they are not formalised into a written agreement. โ๏ธ
It reminded me of something that happened to me 30 yearsโ ago when I was applying for a training contract. Getting a training contract was like finding a needle in a haystack. After literally 1000โs of applications, I secured one interview I secured. ๐
At the interview I had to do a presentation on an area law that I found interesting. I chose the subject of how courts make a moral judgement on a parties behaviour that can have an impact on how our legal rules develop, sometimes upsetting long established legal principles, in ways that have unintended consequences. ๐
I spoke about a case (circa 1996), where a wife had contracted asbestosis from ironing her husbandโs shirts. The Court of Appeal decided that the employer owed a duty of care to the wife and essentially widened their obligations, which previously had only extended to direct employees. ๐๏ธ
I read the judgements carefully and they commented a lot on the conduct of the employer, who was originally sued by the husband. It was clear their opinion was that the employer should have paid compensation to the employee much earlier. But it had used technicalities to delay proceedings until the individual passed away from the illness. โ ๏ธ
There was definitely a sense that this influenced the way they analysed the facts in the wifeโs claim. It was almost as if they wanted to โpunishโ the employer for the way they had treated her husband and this was the conclusion I reached in my presentation. ๐ฏ
At the end of my pitch one of those interviewing me (the Senior Partner of the law firm), said that what I had said was a load of rubbish. Initially I was gobsmacked and heartbroken. This was my one opportunity and I had blown it! ๐
But after a minute or two, the fighter in me came out and I challenged him to explain why he did not give my thoughts credence. I basically stood up for my theory and gave other cases as examples of situations where โequitable principlesโ had come into play. ๐ช
Funnily enough a slight smirk came across his face and he didnโt have much else to say for the rest of the interview. ๐
I went home pretty downtrodden. Getting a training contract was so hard and I had waited so long for this opportunity. ๐ฅ
A week or so letter, a letter came in the post from the practice. Unbelievably I had got the job. โ๏ธโจ
I came across that Senior Partner many times during my 2 years of training. And each time, he used to smile at me with a slightly knowing look. ๐
It was an important lesson to me to stand up for myself and my beliefs. ๐ฑ
Not sure I agree with that interview style though. ๐ค
Anyone else have a nightmare experience like that, which turned out to be okay in the end? ๐ญ