![Similarities and Suspicions Case law - Ahmed & Akbor [2026] UKAITUR JR2023LON002929 notes that it is perfectly acceptabl...](https://img5.lawfirms1.com/320/295/1556085323202953.jpg)
05/10/2026
Similarities and Suspicions
Case law - Ahmed & Akbor [2026] UKAITUR JR2023LON002929 notes that it is perfectly acceptable to use an agent to help with a visitor application with template letters and recommendations. But surprising coincidences of language and evidence might lead to suspicions.
When I first read the above case chat gpt entered my mind.
The Home office may refuse an application where they believe that supporting evidence is very similar with other applicants application. I often witness in my refusal clinics, an application has been refused as the caseworker was not convinced the applicant intends to carry out the attended activities they have mentioned in their application.
When submitting an application, its essential to explain the purpose of the trip, explain exactly where you want to visit. I often see applicants fall into the 'chatgpt trap' where they are suggested to visit certain monuments, and when asked about it by the immigration officer they do not have a clue what the monument is and how to get there.
Every application is unique and so is your journey. Explanations and supporting documents are the key. If it is cultural event in a local park you are visiting state that!
If your supporting documents don't support your intentions, the caseworker may not decide in your favour!
