CSN Law Professional Corporation

03/24/2026

Fairness, Truth, and Righteousness Triumphed.

10/27/2025

R. v. Wilson, 2025 SCC 32

The Supreme Court held that s. 4.1(2) of the CDSA provides immunity from arrest, not just from charge or conviction, for simple possession in overdose situations.

Mr. Wilson stayed at the scene of an overdose, was arrested for possession, and later faced firearm charges and ID fraud charges after a search. The SCC found the arrest unlawful, as it undermined the Good Samaritan Drug Overdose Act’s purpose of encouraging people to seek help without fear of prosecution.

The Court upheld the acquittal—excluding the evidence for Charter breaches (ss. 8 & 9).

Takeaway: Those seeking or remaining for emergency help are protected from arrest for simple possession.

09/25/2025

Defending yourself — when does it cross the line? 🤔 Explore how Self-Defence and Castle Law differ — know your rights before it’s too late. 💡 Read more:

Self Defence vs Castle Law matters: CSN Law explains what Canadian law allows, how it differs from U.S. castle doctrine, and why it’s important.

08/03/2025

Ontario Court of Appeal Clarifies Definition of “Dwelling-House” in Break and Enter Cases.

In a recent decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal provided key clarification on the definition of a “dwelling-house” under Canada’s break and enter provisions. The case involved an accused who had been convicted at trial of six counts of break and enter with intent, along with one count of attempted break and enter, contrary to sections 348(1)(b) and 463(a) of the Criminal Code.

On appeal, one of the primary arguments advanced by defence counsel was that the trial judge had erred in interpreting the term “dwelling-house.”
While the Court upheld the convictions, it allowed the sentence appeal. In doing so, it offered important guidance on the legal meaning of “dwelling-house.”

The central issue was whether secured common areas in apartment buildings—such as lobbies, mail rooms, and storage areas—fall within the definition of a “dwelling-house” under section 348 of the Criminal Code. The Court confirmed that they do. These areas, being restricted to residents and designed to safeguard their security and privacy, are part of a dwelling-house for the purposes of the law.

Crucially, the Court noted that while individuals may have a lower expectation of privacy in shared residential spaces, this does not render those spaces public or strip them of their residential character.

At CSN Law, we continue to follow developments in criminal law that affect the interpretation of statutory rights and the protections afforded to the accused.

If you are facing criminal charges or have questions about your legal rights, our firm is here to help—with unwavering commitment to your defence.

07/24/2025

Impaired Boating in Ontario: It’s a Criminal Offence

Many don’t realize that boating while impaired by alcohol or drugs is treated the same under the Criminal Code as impaired driving.

Whether you’re operating a speedboat, fishing vessel, or even a jet ski—if you're over the legal limit (BAC 0.08+) or impaired by any substance, you can be subject to serious criminal consequences, including:

✅ Immediate arrest
✅ Criminal charges under s. 320.14 of the Criminal Code
✅ Minimum $1,000 fine (first offence)
✅ Potential jail time (subsequent offences)
✅ Suspension of your driver’s licence
✅ A permanent criminal record

If you’ve been charged with impaired operation on the water, don’t navigate it alone.

📞 Contact CSN Law – unwavering commitment to your defence. Protect your rights. Defend your record.

(This post is not legal advice)

07/22/2025

We recently represented a client charged with Assault and Assault Causing Bodily Harm. On paper, the case looked weak — the complainant was over 60 and suffered serious injuries. My client, younger and physically stronger, was quickly charged by police based on how things appeared at the scene.

Optics don’t determine guilt. Only the facts tested at trial do.

After a careful cross-examination, the court found that my client’s actions fell squarely within Section 34 of the Criminal Code — self-defence.

The result: Not Guilty.

a) This case was a stark reminder that criminal defence is not about appearances — it’s about truth, fairness, and the presumption of innocence.

b) It’s why we do what we do.

c) It’s why I’m proud to stand beside my clients, even when the odds look stacked against them.

This is what criminal defence lawyers fight for.

07/01/2025