06/03/2026
The acquittal in R. v. Sloka has raised complex legal questions about consent, credibility, and the interpretation of conduct within medical settings, highlighting ongoing challenges in how sexual assault cases are assessed in Canadian courts.
In their latest blog post, Anna Stoll and Rasha El-Tawil, personal injury and civil sexual abuse partners at Siskinds LLP, examine the trial decision, the legal reasoning behind the acquittal, and what a potential appeal could mean for the future of similar cases.
Read the blog post here:
The recent decision in R. v. Sloka has raised difficult questions about how the justice system responds to allegations of sexual assault.