19/02/2026
A recent court decision in the USA highlights why using AI models to give instructions to your lawyers can be a terrible idea if you are not careful about the privacy terms you are agreeing to.
The judge observed that: 'the written privacy policy to which users of Claude consent provides that Anthropic collects data on both users' "inputs" and Claude's "outputs," that it uses such data to "train" Claude, and that Anthropic reserves the right to disclose such data to a host of "third parties," including "governmental regulatory authorities." ... The policy clearly puts Claude's users on notice that Anthropic, even in the absence of a subpoena compelling it to do so, may "disclose personal data to third parties in connection with claims, disputes [,] or litigation."'
See here for more:
With the recent boom in generative artificail intelligence ("AI") and large language models ("LLMs"), it probably should not come as a surprise that it has become increasingly (and unfortunately) common for me to receive instructions from clients that appear to be generated using consumer AI product...
