National Criminal Lawyers, Level 7, 91 Phillip Street, Parramatta (2026)

03/09/2026

You run a disability support business. Your records are not perfect. The Fraud Fusion Taskforce has executed more than 170 search warrants since 2022. Here is what you need to understand.

NDIS fraud enforcement is now one of the most heavily resourced areas of Commonwealth law in Australia. The Government committed a further $280.1 million in the 2026-27 Budget. Jail sentences have been imposed in 17 of 26 NDIS-related convictions since December 2022.

Here is what the enforcement landscape actually looks like:
• The Fraud Fusion Taskforce combines the NDIA, AFP, Services Australia, ACIC and NDIS Commission. More than 660 investigations have been launched across more than 120 operations
• The primary charges are under the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) carrying maximums of 10 years. Dealing in proceeds of crime and unauthorised computer access charges frequently sit alongside fraud allegations
• Poor records are not the same as dishonesty. The genuinely contestable question in many matters is whether conduct was fraudulent or merely non-compliant. That distinction is where the defence is built
• Support workers have been charged over timesheets for shifts not worked. Participants connected to provider entities have been investigated. Family members managing plans informally are increasingly drawn into investigations
• Proceeds of crime restraint can freeze assets before charges are laid. Payment locks and registration action by the NDIS Commission arrive even earlier

If you have received a compliance letter, a debt notice or a call from investigators, get legal advice before responding. Commonwealth investigators interview after the financial analysis is already complete.

National Criminal Lawyers acts for providers, directors, workers and participants facing NDIS fraud investigations across Australia.

Read the full article: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/ndis-and-aged-care-fraud-how-the-fraud-fusion-taskforce-builds-these-cases-and-what-happens-to-providers-and-workers/

03/09/2026

Police applied for an ADVO. National Criminal Lawyers had it withdrawn and dismissed in full. No final order was made against our client.

At Parramatta Local Court on 25 August 2026, a police application for an Apprehended Domestic Violence Order arising from an alleged family altercation was withdrawn and dismissed entirely.

Here is what this result shows:
• Police must apply for an ADVO where they suspect a domestic violence offence has occurred, whether or not the protected person wants one. That obligation does not mean a final order is inevitable
• NCL carefully reviewed the allegations and the evidence police relied on, then prepared the matter with a genuine view to defending it at hearing
• ADVO proceedings are civil and decided on the balance of probabilities, a lower standard than criminal proceedings, but that does not mean the evidence goes untested
• Following review and discussion about the proceedings, police withdrew the application. The court dismissed it. No final ADVO was made
• An ADVO is not a conviction, but breaching one is a criminal offence carrying penalties of up to 5 years, and any ADVO automatically affects fi****ms licensing for up to 10 years

A Provisional ADVO is not the end of the story. Every case depends on its own facts and evidence, and early legal advice can change the outcome significantly.

National Criminal Lawyers represents clients in police and private ADVO proceedings at Parramatta Local Court and across NSW.

Read the full Case Study: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/police-advo-withdrawn-and-dismissed-at-parramatta-local-court/

02/09/2026

People call it burglary. NSW law calls it break, enter and steal under section 112 of the Crimes Act. The maximum penalty is up to 25 years imprisonment. Here is what that actually means.

The gap between what people expect from a "break and enter" charge and what section 112 actually provides is wide, and it matters from the first court date.

Here is what you need to understand:
• The base offence carries 14 years. Circumstances of aggravation lift that to 20 years. Special aggravation carries 25 years. Standard non-parole periods apply to the aggravated forms
• Breaking does not require damage or force. Opening a closed door, lifting an unlocked window or pushing a door further open all satisfy the definition
• Being in company is a circumstance of aggravation. Two people going in together face a 20-year maximum even where both played a minor role
• Knowing someone was home is also a circumstance of aggravation. The prosecution must prove that knowledge, and it is genuinely contestable
• The lookout and the driver face the same charge as the person who entered. Waiting outside does not reduce criminal exposure
• DNA, fingerprints, CCTV, ANPR data and cell site evidence are all standard in these investigations. Each is contestable and should be properly tested

Do not participate in a police interview before getting legal advice. The forensic evidence is usually already assembled and the interview exists to place you at the scene.

National Criminal Lawyers defends break and enter matters across NSW Local and District Courts.

Learn More: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/why-break-enter-and-steal-is-not-just-a-burglary-how-section-112-is-actually-prosecuted-in-nsw/
Call 1800 CRIM LAW or visit nationalcriminallawyers.com.au for a free consultation.

01/09/2026

Most people convicted of a registrable offence in NSW are not properly told what going on the Child Protection Register actually means. Here is what registration involves and why it matters from day one.

The NSW Child Protection Register is not a sentence. It is a mandatory legal consequence that attaches automatically to a conviction for a registrable offence, regardless of what the court imposes at sentencing.

Here is what registration actually requires:
• Class 1 offenders are registered for life. Class 2 offenders are registered for 15 years. There is no discretion, no early removal pathway and no automatic review
• Reporting obligations begin immediately after conviction. Registered persons must notify police of their address, employment, vehicles, travel plans and online identifiers within specified timeframes. A failure to report is itself a criminal offence carrying up to 5 years imprisonment
• Overseas travel requires prior police approval. Attending specified places where children are present without reasonable excuse is prohibited
• Registration is disclosed in Working With Children Check assessments and affects employment in any child-related field for the entire registration period
• Young offenders are also subject to registration. A person convicted of a Class 1 or Class 2 offence as a juvenile faces a 7-year registration period with its own reporting requirements

The register is a lifetime consequence for Class 1 offenders. Understanding what it requires, and what breaching it means, is as important as understanding the sentence itself.

National Criminal Lawyers advises on registrable offence charges and the registration consequences that follow across NSW.

Read the full article: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/the-register-nobody-explains-properly-what-going-on-the-nsw-child-protection-register-actually-means-for-the-rest-of-your-life/

Call 1800 CRIM LAW or visit nationalcriminallawyers.com.au for a free consultation.

31/08/2026

Police have called about something alleged to have happened decades ago. There is no statute of limitations on serious sexual offences in NSW. Here is how these prosecutions actually work.

Historical sexual assault allegations are increasingly common. BOCSAR data shows sexual assault reports rose 145.5% over the decade to 2025. Understanding how these cases are built and where defences lie is essential from the moment police make contact.

Here is what you need to know:
• The charge is assessed under the law as it stood at the time of the alleged conduct, not today's provisions. The consent framework that applied then governs the elements the prosecution must prove
• The Crown case almost always rests primarily on the complainant's account. Whether multiple counts are tried together or separately, and whether tendency evidence is admitted, frequently determines the outcome of the entire proceeding
• Delay causes genuine forensic disadvantage but is not itself a defence. Directions about disadvantage arising from delay remain available, and in extreme cases a permanent stay may be sought where a fair trial is genuinely impossible
• Defence work is documentary before it is anything else. Records that exist today may not exist in a year. Assembling employment, tenancy, school and travel records immediately is one of the most important early steps
• Do not attend a police interview without legal advice first. In a historical matter, innocent errors about sequence and dates from decades ago are presented at trial as lies. The right to silence protects against that

National Criminal Lawyers defends historical sexual offence matters across the NSW District Court and Court of Criminal Appeal.

Read the full article: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/accused-of-something-from-thirty-years-ago-how-historical-sexual-assault-allegations-are-actually-prosecuted-in-nsw/

Call 1800 CRIM LAW or visit nationalcriminallawyers.com.au for a free consultation.

31/08/2026

Common assault charge. Police ADVO application. Both withdrawn and dismissed on the hearing date at Burwood Local Court. No conviction. No final order.

National Criminal Lawyers recently represented an optometrist facing a common assault domestic violence charge and a police ADVO application at Burwood Local Court. On 25 August 2026, both proceedings were brought to a complete end.
Here is how the result was achieved:
• NCL prepared the matter for a full defended hearing rather than assuming the prosecution would have difficulties. Full preparation placed the defence in the strongest possible position when engaging with the prosecutor before the hearing
• The prosecution brief identified outstanding materials including police witness statements that had not been served before the hearing date. NCL examined the prosecution's readiness to proceed and the implications of the evidentiary state of the brief
• Principal Lawyer Michael Moussa engaged directly with the prosecutor before the hearing, from a position of complete readiness to contest the charge. The prosecution elected not to proceed
• The formal court orders record the criminal charge as dismissed and withdrawn, and the ADVO application as withdrawn and dismissed. The client left court without a conviction and without a final ADVO

Criminal charges can be withdrawn on the day of hearing. But that outcome depends on preparation, not on hoping the prosecution will have problems.

National Criminal Lawyers defends common assault, domestic violence charges and ADVO applications across NSW.

Read the full Case Study: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/common-assault-charge-and-advo-withdrawn-and-dismissed-at-burwood-local-court/

Violence Lawyers

31/08/2026

If police or the AFP have seized your devices or asked you to come in for an interview in relation to material found online or on a device, get legal advice before doing anything else.

This category of offence carries some of the most serious maximum penalties in Australian law. Here is what you need to understand:
• Australian law does not distinguish between real and AI-generated material in this offence category. The statutory definitions capture material that depicts or appears to depict, regardless of how it was produced
• Commonwealth offences carry a maximum of 15 years imprisonment. NSW offences apply simultaneously. A person charged under both frameworks faces cumulative exposure
• Generating material using available technology can constitute a production offence carrying higher maximum penalties than possession. Many people do not realise which category their conduct falls into
• Investigations begin with platform referrals, international law enforcement referrals and device forensics. Deleted material is routinely recovered. Deletion creates an additional evidentiary problem, not a solution
• Bail is a serious hurdle in this category. Internet and device access restrictions are routinely imposed as conditions where bail is granted

Do not attend an interview without legal advice. Do not delete anything. Contact National Criminal Lawyers immediately.

Learn more: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/it-isnt-a-real-child-why-ai-generated-child-abuse-material-is-prosecuted-exactly-like-the-real-thing-in-nsw-and-under-commonwealth-law/

Call 1800 CRIM LAW or visit nationalcriminallawyers.com.au for a free consultation.

27/08/2026

A drug detection dog sat next to you. You were taken to a tent and searched. In NSW, a very large number of those searches have been found to be unlawful. Here is what that means for your charge.

On 30 September 2025 the NSW Supreme Court found that a dog indication alone does not justify a strip search, and that failures in this area were systemic rather than isolated. Thousands of people have registered for a related class action.

Here is what the law actually requires:

• A strip search under s 31 of LEPRA requires that the seriousness and urgency of the circumstances make it necessary. A dog indication or suspicion of minor possession does not satisfy this threshold on its own
• Sections 32 and 33 require privacy, notification of the reason for the search, absence of opposite-sex officers, and for anyone under 18, the presence of a parent or guardian. These requirements are routinely breached at festival and transport settings
• Where a search was unlawful, evidence obtained from it can be excluded under s 138 of the Evidence Act. A gross breach of the strip search safeguards producing a small quantity for personal use is close to the strongest possible exclusion argument
• A dog indication is not proof of anything. Residual odour from prior contact, borrowed clothing or a shared vehicle can all produce an indication without any current possession

If you were searched after a dog indication, do not assume the charge is unwinnable because something was found.

National Criminal Lawyers defends drug charges arising from festival, station and street searches across NSW.

Learn more: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/the-dog-sat-down-next-to-you-strip-searches-drug-detection-dogs-and-when-a-nsw-police-search-is-actually-unlawful/

26/08/2026

Selling illicit to***co in NSW now carries a maximum of 7 years imprisonment. A landlord who knowingly allows it faces up to a year. Here is what retailers, employees and property owners need to understand.

The enforcement landscape changed fundamentally from 3 November 2025. Here is what you need to know:
• Selling illicit to***co or possessing a commercial quantity carries a maximum of 7 years imprisonment and a $1.54 million fine. NSW Health describes these as among the highest penalties of any Australian jurisdiction
• Closure orders can shut a business for up to 90 days by administrative decision alone. NSW Health issued 321 such orders between November 2025 and June 2026. Trading through a closure order is itself a criminal offence
• The new landlord offence catches commercial property owners who knowingly permit illicit sales by tenants. Knowledge can be established circumstantially through correspondence, prior inspections and complaints received
• NSW Police and NSW Health work alongside the TGA and AFP. A single enforcement operation can produce state and federal charges simultaneously
• The NSW Government has expressly linked illicit to***co to organised crime. The 2026 reforms extended asset forfeiture windows and allow courts to consider criminal network links at bail hearings

If inspectors or police have attended your premises, do not answer questions beyond what is legally required before getting legal advice.

National Criminal Lawyers acts for retailers, employees and landlords facing these charges across NSW.

Learn more: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/from-corner-store-side-hustle-to-a-seven-year-offence-how-illicit-to***co-and-vapes-became-one-of-the-most-heavily-policed-areas-in-nsw/

25/08/2026

The legal framework around indoor cultivation of prohibited plants in NSW is more complex than most people charged under it initially realise. Here is what you need to know:

• Section 23A of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) applies where prohibited plants are grown inside using artificial light, artificial heat or nutrient-enriched water. Commonly sold indoor growing equipment can satisfy the statutory definition. Scale and sophistication are not relevant to whether the offence is made out
• The same plant count grown outdoors and indoors under artificial light produces different charges with materially different maximum penalties
• Where a commercial purpose is alleged, no completed sale or identified buyer is required. Purpose is established inferentially from the setup, grow stages, cash, messaging and volume of material. Each element of that inference is individually challengeable
• Section 23 applies to anyone who took part in the cultivation including tending, adjusting equipment or harvesting. A person need not own the plants or equipment to be charged
• A health-related motivation is not a legal defence but may support a mental health diversion application where a formally diagnosed condition contributed to the conduct

If police have executed a warrant, seek legal advice before answering any questions beyond your name and address.

National Criminal Lawyers defends cultivation and related charges across NSW.

Learn more: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/tents-timers-and-hydroponics-how-a-few-cannabis-plants-becomes-an-enhanced-indoor-cultivation-charge-in-nsw/

National Criminal Lawyers

03/09/2026

03/09/2026

02/09/2026

01/09/2026

31/08/2026

31/08/2026

31/08/2026

27/08/2026

26/08/2026

25/08/2026

Address

Website

Alerts

Contact The Practice

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request