National Criminal Lawyers, Level 7, 91 Phillip Street, Parramatta (2026)

01/06/2026

A borrowed licence. An altered date of birth. A fake ordered online. In NSW, any of these can lead to a criminal charge carrying up to 10 years imprisonment.

Using a fake ID to get into a Sydney venue rarely feels serious. The law sees it very differently.
Here is what you need to know:
• The basic offence under the Liquor Act 2007 (NSW) carries a maximum fine of $2,200. But that is only the starting point
• If the ID was created, altered or knowingly possessed as a false document, the charge escalates to s 255 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). Maximum penalty: 10 years imprisonment
• Fake ID use linked to fraud, such as opening bank accounts or impersonating someone, engages s 192E of the Crimes Act. Maximum penalty: 10 years imprisonment
• Modern Sydney venues use scanners that detect mismatched photos, altered barcodes and duplicate IDs. The scan creates a digital record that can be used as evidence
• In April 2026, a man and a teenager were charged after allegedly using false identification to board a flight. The matter escalated to criminal charges mid-flight

The gap between how fake ID use feels and how the law treats it is where most problems arise. Courts focus on deception, misuse of identity, and the potential for broader criminal activity, not on whether you were just trying to get into a club.

National Criminal Lawyers advises clients on fake ID charges, identity offences, fraud and related dishonesty matters across NSW.

Read the full article: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/its-just-a-fake-id-how-one-night-out-in-sydney-can-turn-into-a-criminal-charge/

01/06/2026

Police alleged a slap. No injury. No independent witnesses. No medical evidence. National Criminal Lawyers defended the charge at Blacktown Local Court.

A common assault domestic violence charge is serious. But the prosecution still has to prove it beyond reasonable doubt. NCL identified the evidentiary gaps and used them to protect the client.

Here is what the case involved:

• The allegation arose on Christmas Day 2025 at the family home. Police alleged our client slapped his wife during an argument
• The complainant described the contact as light and stated it caused no pain or injury. There was no medical evidence and no independent eyewitnesses
• The prosecution relied heavily on the complainant and a DVEC. NCL examined whether that evidence could prove every element beyond reasonable doubt
• An interim ADVO named the complainant and children as protected persons. NCL advised the client on exact compliance from day one to avoid any breach allegations
• A domestic violence conviction can affect employment, parenting, immigration and professional licensing. NCL treated the full consequences as part of the strategy from the outset
National Criminal Lawyers defends common assault domestic violence charges and ADVO applications across NSW.

Read the full article: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/case-study-how-to-defend-a-common-assault-dv-charge-built-on-a-light-slap-allegation-with-no-injury/

29/05/2026

𝗖𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝘂𝗱𝘆: 𝗚𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁𝘆 𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗮. 𝗡𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘃𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗱. 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗡𝗖𝗟 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗮 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝟭𝟬 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗱𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘁 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸𝘀𝘁𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗟𝗼𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁.

Many people assume that pleading guilty to a traffic offence automatically means a conviction. It does not. At Bankstown Local Court on 21 May 2026, National Criminal Lawyers secured a section 10(1)(a) dismissal for a client charged with driving while her licence was suspended under the Fines Act.

Here is what made the difference:
• The suspension arose from an unpaid fine, not drink driving, dangerous driving or a court order
• The client told police at the roadside that she believed she had already paid the fine and thought the suspension should no longer apply
• The police facts recorded no actual danger from her driving. Roads were dry, conditions were clear, traffic was medium
• NCL identified every helpful feature of the case and presented them to the Magistrate as a structured and persuasive plea in mitigation
• The court found the client guilty but dismissed the matter under s 10(1)(a) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW). No conviction was recorded

A conviction for driving while suspended is not just a fine. It can affect employment, professional licensing, insurance and how a court treats any future offence. For many people, protecting their record matters just as much as the penalty itself.

A section 10 dismissal is not automatic. It requires proper preparation and persuasive advocacy. The same facts, presented poorly, can lead to a very different result.

National Criminal Lawyers acts for clients charged with driving while suspended, driving while disqualified, drink driving, drug driving and related traffic offences across NSW.

Read the full article here: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/case-study-no-conviction-for-driving-while-suspended-how-national-criminal-lawyers-secured-a-section-10-dismissal-at-bankstown-local-court/

29/05/2026

𝗙𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲. 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗻 𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝘁. 𝗜𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗮𝗹𝗲. 𝗜𝗻 𝗡𝗦𝗪, 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗲𝘁 𝘀𝗮𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘂𝗱 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗿𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘂𝗽 𝘁𝗼 𝟭𝟬 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁.
Few scams feel more personal than a fake concert ticket. The money is gone, the event is imminent, and the buyer usually finds out only when they are already at the gate.

Here is what NSW law actually covers:
• Fraud under s 192E of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) applies where a person dishonestly obtains money or a financial advantage through deception. Maximum penalty: 10 years imprisonment
• The deception can be a fake listing, a false claim that a ticket exists or can be transferred, a cloned barcode, or a screenshot of a ticket that has already been invalidated
• In 2025, a 20-year-old was charged with dealing with proceeds of crime after approximately 150 people allegedly lost money in fake Knockout Outdoor Festival ticket sales in Sydney
• Where multiple victims and repeated transactions are involved, police move quickly from "one unhappy buyer" thinking to organised online fraud. Proceeds of crime charges can follow alongside deception charges
• Digital tickets leave a trail. Platform messages, payment records, transfer histories, account-access logs and barcode data all become evidence

Common questions that do not provide the protection people expect:
• "I meant to refund them" — later repayment does not automatically erase earlier deception
• "Everyone resells tickets online" — lawful authorised resale is different from knowingly fake or dishonest transactions
• "It was only one sale" — if police have multiple complaints, the picture changes quickly

If police have contacted you about ticket sales, get legal advice before explaining yourself.

Learn more: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/sold-out-show-fake-barcode-no-entry-when-ticket-scams-become-fraud-in-nsw/

28/05/2026

𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘀. 𝗧𝘄𝗼 𝗔𝗗𝗩𝗢 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀. 𝗔𝗹𝗹 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗱𝗿𝗮𝘄𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘁 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗮 𝗟𝗼𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁.

This is what strategic early defence work looks like in a domestic violence matter.
Our client faced charges of stalking and intimidation, two counts of common assault domestic violence, and contravene AVO, alongside two separate ADVO applications. On paper, it looked serious. But the prosecution still had to prove every charge beyond reasonable doubt.
Here is what NCL did:
• Identified that the complainant was overseas in India with no intention of returning, creating a fundamental problem for the prosecution's reliance on the Domestic Violence Evidence in Chief recording
• Argued that using the DVEC without the complainant being available for cross-examination would be procedurally unfair and legally defective under the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW)
• Submitted there was no reasonable prospect of conviction and that continuing the prosecution was not in the public interest, given the complainant did not wish to proceed
• Raised the client's significant professional and personal hardship caused by ongoing bail conditions, including passport surrender and travel restrictions
• Put police on formal notice of a costs application if the matter proceeded unnecessarily
The result on 20 May 2026 at Parramatta Local Court: every charge dismissed as withdrawn, both ADVO applications withdrawn and dismissed, no convictions recorded.
Domestic violence defence is not about simply turning up to court. It is about understanding the evidence, the procedure, and the pressure points that can make a prosecution collapse before it reaches a hearing.
National Criminal Lawyers defends domestic violence charges, ADVO applications, stalking and intimidation matters and contravene AVO charges across NSW.
Read the full article: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/all-domestic-violence-charges-and-advo-applications-withdrawn-at-parramatta-local-court/

27/05/2026

𝗔 𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁. 𝗔 𝗗𝗠. 𝗔 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗳 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁𝘀𝗔𝗽𝗽 𝗺𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿. 𝗜𝗻 𝗡𝗦𝗪, 𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗮 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲.

Most people charged over online conduct say the same thing: it was only a message. That is exactly why these matters catch people off guard.

Here is what you need to understand:
• Section 474.17 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) makes it a criminal offence to use a carriage service in a way reasonable people would regard as menacing, harassing or offensive. Maximum penalty: 3 years imprisonment
• The law does not require explicit threats. Repeated messages, persistent contact after being asked to stop, and humiliating or controlling communications can all cross the line
• Courts assess the conduct objectively. What felt like seeking closure at midnight can look deliberate and menacing when read back in court months later
• If an AVO is in place, a single follow-up message, a tag, or even an indirect message through someone else can be a criminal breach carrying up to 2 years imprisonment
• Digital conversations do not disappear. Screenshots, metadata, cloud backups and seized devices all preserve the record. Deleting messages can look like consciousness of guilt

Common misconceptions that make things worse:
• "They replied, so it cannot be harassment" — wrong
• "We reconciled, so the issue is gone" — wrong
• "Deleting the messages helps" — often wrong
• "A quick apology fixes the legal problem" — wrong

If police have contacted you about messages or online contact, do not keep messaging the other person, do not explain yourself to police without legal advice, and do not assume the matter will resolve itself.

National Criminal Lawyers advises clients on carriage service offences, AVO breaches, coercive control allegations and related digital evidence matters across NSW.

Read more: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/it-was-just-a-message-when-texts-dms-and-social-media-posts-become-criminal-charges-in-nsw/

27/05/2026

𝗗𝗿𝘂𝗴 𝗱𝗼𝗴𝘀. 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗽 𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗲𝘀. 𝗢𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲. 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗡𝗦𝗪 𝗺𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗰 𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗮𝗹, 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝘄 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘀𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀.

Most people assume that if police want to search them at a festival, they can. That assumption is wrong, and a 2025 NSW Supreme Court decision proves it.

Here is what the law actually requires:
• Police can only search you under LEPRA if they have reasonable suspicion based on actual facts. A gut feeling or general concern is not enough

• A drug dog indication does not automatically justify a search. Evidence in recent NSW litigation showed some drug dogs have accuracy rates as low as 30%

• Strip searches are only lawful in serious and urgent circumstances. They must be necessary, conducted with privacy, and be the least invasive option available

• In 2025 the NSW Supreme Court found that strip searches conducted at Splendour in the Grass were unlawful. Police admitted the search was unlawful. No drugs were found on the plaintiff. Damages were awarded

• That case is part of a broader class action involving thousands of people who allege they were subjected to unlawful searches at NSW festivals

• Possession of a prohibited drug carries a maximum of 2 years imprisonment. Sharing drugs with friends can be charged as supply, not just possession

Many people do not recognise when legal thresholds have not been met. If you were searched, strip searched, or charged at a festival and something felt wrong, the law may be on your side.

National Criminal Lawyers advises clients on unlawful searches, strip search challenges, drug possession and supply charges across NSW.

Read more: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/can-police-search-you-at-a-music-festival-drug-dogs-strip-searches-and-the-reality-of-nsw-festival-policing/

26/05/2026

"𝗜 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗿𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲." 𝗜𝗻 𝗡𝗦𝗪, 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵 𝘁𝗼 𝗮𝘃𝗼𝗶𝗱 𝗮 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗿 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲.

Most people do not think of repeated texting as criminal behaviour. But NSW law does not assess this conduct through the lens of what you meant. It assesses it through impact, persistence, and context.

Here is where the legal line falls:
• Stalking and intimidation under the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) carries a maximum of 5 years imprisonment. The law explicitly covers contact by text, phone, email and social media

• There is no minimum number of messages required. Courts look at the overall pattern, including whether the recipient clearly asked for contact to stop

• Once someone has told you not to contact them, continued messaging takes on a very different legal character. What felt like seeking closure can be read as deliberate persistence

• Intention is assessed objectively. Being ignored, blocked, or told to stop makes it very difficult to later argue you did not realise your conduct might cause fear or distress

• Switching platforms does not reduce legal risk. Messaging through social media after being blocked on a phone, or using alternative accounts, is assessed as part of the same pattern

• If an AVO is in place, a single message saying "can we talk?" can be a criminal breach of the order

The law is not limited to extreme cases. It is designed to capture behaviour that is persistent, unwanted, and distressing, even where there are no explicit threats.
National Criminal Lawyers advises clients on stalking, intimidation, AVO breaches and related criminal matters across NSW.

Learn more: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/when-does-texting-become-stalking-in-nsw-the-legal-risk-behind-just-one-more-message/

24/05/2026

𝗦𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗩𝗢 𝗶𝗻 𝗡𝗦𝗪? 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝘆𝗽𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴.

Whether you are a defendant or someone seeking protection, the difference between a provisional, interim and final AVO matters enormously.
Here is what each one means:
• A provisional AVO is issued by police in an emergency, often without the defendant present or having spoken to a court. It takes effect immediately upon service
• An interim AVO is made by a Magistrate to keep protection in place while the case proceeds. This can last for months. Defendants often consent without admission while the matter is being resolved
• A final AVO is the court's ultimate decision. It can be made by consent, by default, or after a full contested hearing
And here is what many people do not realise:
• An AVO is not a criminal conviction, but even a provisional or interim order automatically suspends your fi****ms licence and can affect your Working With Children Check and employment
• Breaching an AVO is a serious criminal offence carrying up to 2 years imprisonment
• Consenting to a final AVO "without admission" can still trigger regulatory consequences for professionals. Many regulatory bodies do not distinguish between a consent order and a contested one
Whether you want to contest the AVO, negotiate conditions, or understand what accepting the order actually means for your life and career, early legal advice is essential.
National Criminal Lawyers represents defendants and protected persons in AVO proceedings across NSW.
Read the full article: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/understanding-avos-the-differences-between-provisional-interim-and-final-orders-in-nsw/

21/05/2026

𝗛𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗮 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝘀 "𝗣𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗫" 𝗼𝗿 "𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗱"? 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗡𝗦𝗪, 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗹𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗿 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹, 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗳𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗹𝘆, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗳𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲.

Australian courts operate on the principle of open justice. But that principle has limits, and the law provides real tools to protect people from damaging media coverage before a verdict is reached.

Here is what you need to know:
• Courts can issue suppression or non-publication orders under the Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) to prevent prejudice to a fair trial, protect personal safety, or avoid undue distress to victims
• Some protections are automatic. Sexual assault complainants are protected from identification for life. Children involved in criminal proceedings are automatically shielded from publication
• Breaching a suppression order is contempt of court, carrying imprisonment of up to 12 months for individuals and massive fines for media organisations
• Media outlets including major broadcasters and newspapers regularly have lawyers in court arguing against these orders. Without experienced representation, those arguments can succeed

In the social media age, suppressed information can still appear on overseas platforms. A juror accidentally encountering that material online can force a mistrial, costing enormous time and resources and putting victims through a second hearing.

If you or a loved one is involved in a sensitive criminal matter, protecting your identity and your right to a fair trial requires early, strategic legal advice.

National Criminal Lawyers applies for suppression orders, challenges media access applications and protects clients' privacy across NSW criminal proceedings.

Read the full article: https://www.nationalcriminallawyers.com.au/the-veil-of-secrecy-understanding-suppression-orders-in-nsw-criminal-courts/

National Criminal Lawyers

01/06/2026

01/06/2026

29/05/2026

29/05/2026

28/05/2026

27/05/2026

27/05/2026

26/05/2026

24/05/2026

21/05/2026

Address

Website

Alerts

Contact The Practice

Shortcuts

Share

Category