Daleen Frey - Attorney & Labour Practitioner

Daleen Frey - Attorney & Labour Practitioner Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Daleen Frey - Attorney & Labour Practitioner, Lawyer & Law Firm, Veritas Circle Chambers, Nelspruit SP.

23/11/2023

THE IMPORTANCE OF A COMPLETE RECORD OF THE ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS

The importance of a complete record of the arbitration proceedings

Lessons from Minister of Police v Police and Prisons Civil Rights Union (POPCRU) Obo Senti and Others (PA15/2021) [2023] ZALAC 19 (23 August 2023)

The importance of a full and proper record of the arbitration in review applications was brought into sharp focus in the case of Minister Of Police v Police And Prisons Civil Rights Union (POPCRU) obo Senti and Others.

By Bankey Sono – Director and Neo Sewela – Associate

In this case, 2 police officers, Warrant Officer Senti and Constable Folokwe, of the South African Police Service (SAPS) were dismissed following a disciplinary hearing. Following their dismissal the two employees referred an unfair dismissal claim to the Safety and Security Sectoral Bargaining Council (the SSSBC). The commissioner appointed to arbitrate the dispute found that the dismissal of the 2 employees was unfair and ordered that they be reinstated by SAPS.

Dissatisfied with the commissioner’s award, SAPS brought a review application seeking to overturn the commissioner’s award or, alternatively, to have the matter heard afresh before another SSSBC commissioner.

As the applicant in the review, SAPS was required to file the complete record of the arbitration proceedings however in this case a substantial portion of the record was missing. Crucially, the missing portion included the cross-examination of Employees’ only witness, Mr Senti himself, and the video footage related to the misconduct which was crucial at the arbitration.

The Labour Court upheld the arbitration award however the Labour Appeal Court (the LAC) overturned the Labour Court’s decision.

Dealing with the missing record, the LAC found that the record (before it and the Labour Court) was inadequate to arrive at a fair and reasonable determination. Further, the LAC found that –

[27] The missing evidence is necessary to determine the reasonableness of the Commissioner’s decision. To argue that the onus is upon the Appellant to ensure a full and proper record is before the Court is in my view not always correct. It is the responsibility of all the parties particularly the Commission, who has the responsibility to ensure not only that it keeps a full and proper record, but to ensure in the event of a review, that a full and complete record of the proceedings is before the reviewing Court. (emphasis added)

This case clearly shows the importance of a full and proper record as without it the review court is not able to determine the reasonableness of the commissioner’s decision.

Furthermore, this case shows the complications that arise when the record, or parts thereof, go missing. It provides a good lesson for all litigants, not just the commissioner/panellists, involved in labour litigation on the importance of ensuring that a good and proper record of the arbitration hearing is kept and that ultimately a full and proper record is placed before Labour Court in a review.

Article published with the kind courtesy of Werksmans Attorneys www.werksmans.com

04/05/2023

Unequal pay does not necessarily equal unfair discrimination In a recent judgment the Labour Court dismissed the claim by five black employees that Makro had…

25/04/2023

NEW CCMA RULES AND FORMS 2023

IMPORTANT UPDATE

The CCMA has published its long-awaited amendments to the rules for proceedings before the Commission. As a result of these amendments, updated LRA forms were also published (referral forms such as the LRA 7.11).

The CCMA rules and LRA forms can be downloaded free of charge from our website here.

https://labourguide.co.za/misconduct/free-downloads-misconduct/new-ccma-rules-and-forms-2023/

We will soon present a morning workshop, discussing the amended rules in detail.

14/03/2023

’n Man wat onder meer talle buite-egtelike verhoudings aangegaan en sy vrou se onderneming probeer kaap het, het sy dreuning teëgekom.

Here is an article making some interesting points. I will comment on it a little later in the day.
13/03/2023

Here is an article making some interesting points. I will comment on it a little later in the day.

A recent court case reiterates harassment laws.

The attached article makes one wonder how bail in South Africa works. How is it possible that some people get away with ...
25/02/2023

The attached article makes one wonder how bail in South Africa works. How is it possible that some people get away with R500 and others have to pay thousands of Rand?

According to The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa any person who has been arrested can apply for bail, irrespective of the type of crime the person has been charged with.

There are three different bail applications:

a) Police Bail
b) Prosecutor Bail
c) Bail Applications in Court

I only discuss bail in court for the purposes of this entry.

If a person is charged with a schedule 5 or schedule 6 offence, they have to make a formal bail application before court in terms of Section 60 of the Criminal Procedure Act. (murder, r**e, sexual crimes, crimes against children, human trafficking, armed robbery, etc.)

This application can be done by way of an affidavit or by calling witnesses or the accused to the stand.

The accused must disclose any pending cases or previous convictions to the court. Not doing it, constitutes a criminal offense.

The prosecutor may oppose the bail. The court will take all this information into account before making a decision. The court will also take various other factors into account before granting the bail eg:

The accused will need to ensure the court that:

a) his/her release will not endanger their safety or the safety of the public or another person.
b) the accused will not avoid trial
c) the accused will not try to influence or intimidate witnesses or hide or destroy evidence
d) the accused will not undermine the justice system
e) the accused will not disturb public order, peace and security

If the Magistrate is of the opinion that one of the above instances exists, bail will be refused and you will be placed in custody until the end of your trial, which can take years. Once bail is denied, you cannot apply for bail again unless new facts arise or your personal circumstances change. An accused could appeal the ruling if bail were refused.

Once bail has been granted, the accused needs to be present at every appearance, otherwise bail can be revoked, and the accused can be arrested and taken into custody.

It is important to keep in mind that bail is not a form of penalty and that the amount of bail does not indicate the seriousness of the case. The amount is determined to secure an accused’s return to court to finalise the matter.

It is advisable to use an attorney in the event of having to apply for bail.

DISCLAIMER: This entry does not serve as legal advice.

Borgtog van R500 elk is Vrydag aan die vermeende ontvoerders van Gerhard de Jongh (63), ’n bekende prokureur van Bellville, toegestaan.

Die nuwe drempel vir mense wie se maksimum werkure en oortydbetaling deur die Wet op Basiese Diensvoorwaardes gereguleer...
21/02/2023

Die nuwe drempel vir mense wie se maksimum werkure en oortydbetaling deur die Wet op Basiese Diensvoorwaardes gereguleer word is Maandag bekend gemaak. .

Dit is tot R241 110,59 per jaar verhoog. Die drempel verhoog op 1 Maart.

Die nuwe nasionale minimum loon is R25,42 per uur.

1. Mense wat minder as R20 000 per maand voor aftrekkings verdien, geniet die beskerming van die Wet op Basiese Diensvoorwaardes.

2. Mense wat meer as R20 000 per maand verdien, kan nie aandring op oortydbetaling nie – tensy dit reeds deel van hul dienskontrak is.

3. Mense in senior bestuursposte is nie onderhewig aan die bepalings van die wet nie. ’n Senior bestuurder word beskryf as iemand wat die gesag het om mense aan te stel, te dissiplineer en af te dank.

4. Aan die ander kant mag regte wat mense ingevolge hul dienskontrak reeds het, nie verwyder word nie.

5. Vir mense wat minder as die drempelbedrag verdien, geld die volgende:

• Oortyd mag net soos ooreengekom tussen die werkgewer en die werknemer gewerk word en nooit meer as tien uur per week nie.

• Mense onder die drempel moet 1,5 keer hul normale uurlikse loon vir oortyd betaal word. Werknemers mag tyd af, eerder as betaling kry, maar net as dit so ooreengekom is.

• Werknemers mag nie meer as 45 uur normale ure per week werk nie en nie meer as tien uur oortyd per week nie. Hulle mag ook weier om meer as 12 uur op enige dag te werk (nege uur gewone tyd en drie uur oortyd), tensy dit ’n noodgeval is.

• Dispute met 'n werkgewer kan by die Kommissie vir Versoening, Bemiddeling en Arbitrasie aangemeld word.

• ’n Vastetermynkontrak van langer as drie maande word beskou as heeltydse werknemers.

Vir mense wat meer as die drempelbedrag verdien, geld die volgende:

• Hulle kan nie eise stel oor maksimum werkure, oortydbetaling of enige ander bepalings van die wet waarop die drempelbedrag van toepassing is nie. Hulle mag egter daaroor onderhandel en die dienskontrak sal bepalend wees.

• Indien oortydbetaling onderhandel word, mag dit wel minder as 1,5 keer die uurlikse loon wees. Dieselfde geld betaling of tyd af vir Sondagwerk en werk op openbare vakansiedae.

• Aan die ander kant mag werknemers weier om op Sondae, vakansiedae of op bystand te werk. Werkgewers moet dus ook daaroor onderhandel.

• As hulle enige dispuut met hul werkgewer het, moet hulle hulle tot die arbeidshof wend.

• Selfs as hulle op ’n vastetermynkontrak van langer as drie maande aangestel is, word hulle nié as heeltydse werknemers beskou nie.

Lug solank jou mening oor die voorval hieronder waaroor Netwerk24 in Januarie berig het. Ek sal volgende week in 'n kort...
02/02/2023

Lug solank jou mening oor die voorval hieronder waaroor Netwerk24 in Januarie berig het. Ek sal volgende week in 'n kort video verduidelik hoe ek d**k die situasie hanteer moet word.

’n Enkelma van Bethlehem gaan ’n beskermingsbevel teen ’n manlike kollega kry ná ’n onderonsie vandeesweek by die werkplek waarin sy met die vuis in die gesig geslaan is.

This article was recently published in the Afrikaans daily Beeld. Read this together with the article pasted underneath,...
30/01/2023

This article was recently published in the Afrikaans daily Beeld. Read this together with the article pasted underneath, to get a better understanding of the situation which affects employers and employees alike.

Load Shedding and Employment Law
By Jacques van Wyk, Director and Michiel Heyns, Senior Associate, Werksmans Attorneys

The recent announcement of the implementation of load shedding throughout the country may have severe implications for business and labour relations.

Introduction
Employers and employees should know their rights and duties during these periods of interrupted power supply. Employers need to ensure that they comply with labour law requirements while at the same time, implementing measures to reduce the negative impact that load shedding has on their businesses.

Employer and Employee Obligations
Many employers are under the impression that when employees are unable to work due to load shedding the ‘no work, no pay’ principle applies. This is not the case. Our common and labour laws are clear – if the employer expects the employees to be at work at a specific time and on a specific day and the employees comply with these requirements, the employer is obliged to pay them for that time. This is regardless of whether the employees were able to perform their duties or not.

The employment contract is a reciprocal agreement in terms of which an employer’s obligation to pay an employee is subject to the employee doing the work or putting his/her product capacity at the disposal of the employer. The duty to pay and the corresponding right to remuneration do not arise from the actual performance of the work, but from the tendering of service or productive capacity. Therefore, where an employee offers to do the work and the employer does not want the employee to work or cannot provide the employee with work (due to load shedding or any other reason), the employer is still obliged to pay the employee his/her wages or salaries. An employer is therefore obliged to perform even when an employee is unable to perform due to circumstances beyond the control of the employer.

In an effort to reduce the losses associated with this cessation of work during load shedding, some employers may wish to treat these stoppages as meal intervals. The problem with this approach is not only that the break in supply of electricity may last several hours but also that, in terms of section 14 of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (“BCEA”), an employer must pay employees for any lunch break in excess of 75 minutes, unless the employee lives on the premises.

A better strategy available to some employers is to rely on agreed procedures that apply to interruptions of production, such as in the metal and engineering industries. The Metal and Engineering Industries Bargaining Council Main Agreement (“the Agreement”) differentiates between planned and unplanned load shedding. Unplanned load shedding is, for example, where Eskom cannot with complete certainty inform the public of exactly when load shedding will be implemented (what Eskom does rather, is inform us of the likelihood of when load shedding may be implemented). Planned load shedding is load shedding that occurs at a pre-determined and publicised time and date.

In terms of section 7 of the Agreement, an employer may implement “short time” (i.e. reduced working time) “owing to a shortage of work and/or materials and any other justifiable contingencies, including planned load shedding and/or unforeseen contingencies and/or circumstances beyond the control of the employer.”

Where the circumstances are unforeseen or unplanned (such as unplanned load shedding) the employer may:
1. Elect to send the employees home, provided they shall receive not less than four hours’ work or pay in lieu thereof; or
2. Expressly instruct employees sent home to return, where the employer believes work can be resumed, provided the employees shall receive not less than four hours’ work or pay in lieu thereof.

Notably, the Agreement provides that “[w]here the employer does not implement short time in response to a planned or foreseen load shedding and the employees report for work but are sent home by the employer, they will be entitled to 8 hours payment in respect of such day.”

Unfortunately, most load shedding is unplanned with Eskom only announcing its implementation a few hours before it commences or changing it from Stage 1 to Stage 2 at some point during the load shedding period. This may be hugely disruptive for employers and especially onerous on employers in the large metal and engineering industry who are subject to the Agreement. An employer may implement short time, expecting load shedding to commence on a specific day and if the load shedding does not go ahead, the employer is left with minimal staff capacity. Furthermore, if load shedding is implemented unexpectedly or its level increases, this leaves the employer with little choice but to send employees home, paying them at least four hour’s wages even though they may not have worked at all.

Unfortunately, not all industries have an equivalent of the Agreement. For those employers who do not fall within the scope of the Agreement the choices are not easy.

Another question that arises during load shedding periods is: how much must employees be paid if they need to work past their normal work hours to make up for the hours lost during the day? According to the BCEA, any work performed after normal hours to catch up production will be regarded as overtime and will be subject to additional, overtime pay. However, employers and employees can agree to changes in working hours or shift structures in order to reduce the financial losses caused by load shedding.

It is not compulsory in terms of the BCEA to work overtime; nevertheless, circumstances (such as operational requirements caused by load shedding) may warrant extension of working hours. An employer may require employees to start work later than usual and finish later than usual. But, an employer may not unilaterally implement new working hours. In most cases employees must agree to such changes.

It may be possible for the employer and employee to agree in the employment contract that payment or remuneration will be suspended during load shedding. The difficulty with this is that the employees will have to agree to such terms (or changes to their contracts of employment). If they do not, these changes cannot be implemented unilaterally.

If employees do not agree to changes in working hours, shift structures, pay or any similar measure designed to relieve the burden on employers during load shedding, the employer may be forced to implement retrenchment procedures in terms of sections 189 or 189A of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (as amended) (“LRA”). The employer would have to follow certain steps and show that due to operational requirements brought about by load shedding (being the technological, structural or similar needs of an employer), the employer needs to retrench a given number of employees.

Conduct Issues Arising from Load Shedding
Another problem for employers during load shedding periods is dealing with what might otherwise be considered to be misconduct by their employees, such as late coming. Employers should be cautious and understand that exceptional circumstances exist during load shedding. So, for instance, late coming due to load shedding should be managed and employee’s counselled on how to work around the impact of load shedding on travel, traffic and daily life. On the other hand, employees are also under an obligation to take the appropriate steps to reduce the potential problems that arise during load shedding periods such as increased travelling time or less time available during normal working hours to complete tasks.

Conclusion
It is clear that load shedding will be with us for some time to come. Employers must be cautious not to contravene labour law requirements during these periods in an effort to reduce the consequences of load shedding. It is advisable that employers negotiate a plan to minimise its effect with employees. For example, where load shedding is planned for the beginning or end of a shift, the times of the shifts could be amended to ensure there is no loss of work time. Employers may also have to be flexible – perhaps using the load shedding times for training or staff meetings. It is important that employers and employees be understanding of the serious implications load shedding has on both sides of the employment relationship and engage in meaningful consultation to ensure the least disruptive outcome is achieved.

Ondernemings wat gekniehalter word deur beurtkrag, moet twee keer d**k voordat hulle werknemers se lone besnoei vir die ure wat hulle nie kan werk nie.

Address

Veritas Circle Chambers
Nelspruit SP
1200

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Daleen Frey - Attorney & Labour Practitioner posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Daleen Frey - Attorney & Labour Practitioner:

Share