06/17/2023
A compelling introduction? Inviting thoughts:
How can justice be so far out of reach within the very system that proclaims to jealously protect the people's confidence in it? What of our judicial system beyond financial strain and overextended dockets has brought us to subversively and summarily justifying the erroneous rulings of the overworked jurist and overzealous jurist alike without a moment of consideration to distinguish between the two? Does the law of our land—jealously protected and distinguished from the overreaching law of the land—not deserve the same stewardship, enforcement and defense that the homeowner deserves against the opportunistic burglar or the voter deserves against uncertain elections? If we do not operate from this basic and fundamental belief and principle, that the foundation of justice is good faith, then jealously protecting the confidence of the people in our system of justice is not for the benefit of those who have given their trust, but rather for the benefit of those intent on manipulating their confidence. And if we have known anything to be unwaveringly certain since the inception of the Great State of California, there are always those vultures that would have the trust, labor, and profits of our people without the first consideration for the well-being or vested rights of the same.
For this reason we incessantly tie the hands as reasonably as we can of the positions best situated to disrupt, violate, and deny the rights of our people. If we do not, the faithfully confident in this system that seek justice from it are barred first at the entrance with ease and then are burdened with the exponentially more difficult request of review that follows. We must hope, then, that the fixed seats filled by those reviewing jurists meant to preserve justice do not weary those same jurists' hearts in their fixed course of preserving it. Here I stand before this Court, myself weary by an unnecessarily protracted pursuit of justice, respectfully requesting by the polity of legal discourse, though in sincerity begging by enduring faith that but barely bears near-absolute exhaustion, this Court view the arguments set forth herein with an eye focused more on repairing the manipulated and broken road to justice than the procedural requirements of the common person endeavoring to walk it.