08/01/2024
There's been some interesting progress in the space of generative AI in relation to unauthorized representations of individuals (pop reference: "deep fakes").
Dr Jordan B Peterson, for example, has asked if it would make sense to view certain harmful, unauthorized representations of this type in a manner similar to kidnapping under current criminal laws (i.e. would someone's unauthorized representation of your voice, used to commit a crime, be akin to holding you at gunpoint to read a pre-scripted demand?)
The article linked below from IPWatchdog, Inc, discusses a recently proposed US bill addressing some aspects of these matters. From author and Editor-in-Chief, Eileen McDermott, “The proposed legislation would establish a federal property right for every individual in their own voice and likeness. There are exceptions for news, broadcast, advertising/ marketing and documentary use, public criticism or commentary and ‘fleeting or negligible’ use, among others."
I wonder what a federal property right in an individual's own voice and likeness could do in the context of bad editing 🤔 mischaracterizing edits of, say, actively campaigning political candidates... Would splicing a speech to make it seem like someone said something controversial fall under an exception, or will we see more integrity coming back into journalism as a whole 🤞?
Read the above-reference article here: https://ipwatchdog.com/2024/07/31/senators-introduce-no-fakes-act-create-universal-right-control-digital-replicas/id=179705/
Senators Chris C***s (D-DE), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), and Thom Tillis (R-NC) today officially introduced the “Nurture Originals, Foster Art, and Keep Entertainment Safe Act of 2024” (NO FAKES Act).