Franco Legal, PLLC

08/19/2026

08/14/2026

08/07/2026

A federal judge has found the Department of Homeland Security in civil contempt, ruling that the government repeatedly removed young asylum seekers it was legally barred from deporting, including in cases where the government’s files expressly reflected a restriction against deportation.

The ruling in J.O.P. v. DHS, a case centered on the asylum rights of people who came to the U.S. as unaccompanied children, found that at least 107 people protected by the 2024 settlement—54 confirmed class members and 53 more the government itself had flagged as potentially protected—were removed under final removal orders before their asylum claims were ever decided.

Going forward, the court has ordered DHS to check its own records for protective flags before removing anyone, add those flags within two business days of newly identifying someone as potentially protected, and issue written guidance to ICE staff nationwide. DHS must also report to the court every two weeks on any class members it has removed and what it’s doing to fix the problem.

➡️ Full press release: https://nipnlg.org/news/press-releases/federal-court-finds-dhs-contempt-over-removals-young-asylum-seekers-protected

07/30/2026

https://asaptogether.org/es/cambios-leyes/

Esta página proporciona noticias urgentes para los solicitantes de asilo sobre: asilo , permisos de trabajo , la corte de inmigración , límites para 4…

07/27/2026

07/25/2026