Ch. Ejaz Khatana Advocate

Ch. Ejaz Khatana Advocate Deal In CRIMINAL, CIVIL, FAMILY And All Kind of Legal Matters. Contact
03478222337

10/09/2026
Thank You Rawalpindi Bar.
02/09/2026

Thank You Rawalpindi Bar.

(إِنَّ اللَّهَ وَمَلَائِكَتَهُ يُصَلُّونَ عَلَى النَّبِيِّ ۚ يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا صَلُّوا عَلَيْهِ وَسَلِّمُوا...
25/08/2026

(إِنَّ اللَّهَ وَمَلَائِكَتَهُ يُصَلُّونَ عَلَى النَّبِيِّ ۚ يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا صَلُّوا عَلَيْهِ وَسَلِّمُوا تَسْلِيمًا)

بے شک اللہ اور اس کے فرشتے نبیﷺ پر درود بھیجتے ہیں۔
اے ایمان والوں تم بھی نبیﷺ پر دُرود اور سلام بھیجا کرو،
سورة الأحزاب ﴿۵۶﴾

صلّ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ🤍

Strong condemnation by members of the Pakistan Bar Council of the blatant violation of the Supreme Court’s clear order c...
22/08/2026

Strong condemnation by members of the Pakistan Bar Council of the blatant violation of the Supreme Court’s clear order concerning Imran Khan.
Compliance with court orders is not optional; it is a constitutional and legal obligation. There can be no compromise on the rule of law and the supremacy of the judiciary.

A Matter of Constitutional PrincipleThe joint position reportedly taken by 19 members of the Punjab Bar Council regardin...
22/08/2026

A Matter of Constitutional Principle
The joint position reportedly taken by 19 members of the Punjab Bar Council regarding the alleged non-compliance with the Supreme Court of Pakistan’s order concerning Imran Khan is a timely reminder of a fundamental principle: the authority of the courts must be respected without exception.
In a constitutional democracy, court orders are not matters of convenience, preference, or political expediency. They are binding directives of the judicial institution, and their sanctity is essential to the rule of law and the credibility of the justice system.
The demand that those responsible for any deliberate disobedience of the Supreme Court’s order be proceeded against in accordance with law, including appropriate contempt proceedings where legally warranted, deserves serious consideration by the competent authorities.
No individual, institution, office-holder, or government is above the law. The strength of a constitutional order lies not merely in the words written in its Constitution, but in the willingness of every state institution to obey the law and uphold judicial authority.
The supremacy of the Constitution, the independence of the judiciary, and the dignity of judicial orders must remain non-negotiable.
Justice must prevail, the Constitution must be honoured, and every lawful court order must be implemented fully, faithfully, and without delay.

سپریم کورٹ آف پاکستان نے بانئ پی ٹی آئی عمران خان  کا تمام میڈیکل ریکارڈ طلب کرتے ہوئے انہیں شفاء انٹرنیشنل اسپتال منتق...
18/08/2026

سپریم کورٹ آف پاکستان نے بانئ پی ٹی آئی عمران خان کا تمام میڈیکل ریکارڈ طلب کرتے ہوئے انہیں شفاء انٹرنیشنل اسپتال منتقل کرنے کا حکم دے دیا۔

جسٹس شاہد وحید کی سربراہی میں 3 رکنی بینچ نے بانیٔ پی ٹی آئی سے ملاقات اور علاج سے متعلق درخواستوں پر سماعت کی۔

سپریم کورٹ نے کہا ہے کہ میڈیکل بورڈ تشکیل دیا جائے، بانئ پی ٹی آئی کو سخت سیکیورٹی کے تحت اسپتال منتقل کیا جائے، اسپتال کے باہر امن و امان کی صورتِ حال متاثر نہیں ہونی چاہیے۔

بانئ پی ٹی آئی کو شفاء انٹرنیشنل اسپتال منتقل کرنے کی درخواست پر عبوری حکم جاری کرتے ہوئے کہا ہے کہ شفاء انٹرنیشل اسپتال ڈاکٹرز کا بورڈ تشکیل دے، بانئ پی ٹی آئی کی بہن ڈاکٹر عظمیٰ اور ذاتی معالج موجود ہوں گے۔

عدالت نے ہفتے میں ایک دن اہلخانہ سے بھی بانئ پی ٹی آئی ملاقات کا حکم دیتے ہوئے پی ٹی آئی کو علاج پر سیاست کرنے سے بھی روک دیا اور کہا کہ بانی آئندہ سماعت تک اسپتال میں رہیں گے۔

سپریم کورٹ نے کہا ہے کہ شفاء اسپتال کے اخراجات فیملی برداشت کرے گی، بانئ پی ٹی آئی کو چند دنوں میں منتقل کرنے سے متعلق اقدامات کیے جائیں، میڈیکل رپورٹ کو سیاست کے لیے استعمال نہیں کیا جائے گا، خلاف ورزی پر دی جانے والی سہولیات واپس لے لی جائیں گی۔

عدالت نے بانئ پی ٹی آئی سے بہنوں کی ملاقاتوں، بچوں سے بات کروانے کا ریکارڈ بھی مانگ لیا اور آئندہ سماعت پر اڈیالہ جیل حکام کو پیش ہونے کی ہدایت کر دی۔

دورانِ سماعت جسٹس شاہد وحید نے کہا ہے کہ بانئ پی ٹی آئی کا میڈیکل ریکارڈ دینے میں کیا مسئلہ ہے؟ جو مواد دیا گیا ہے وہ صرف میڈیکل رپورٹ کی سمری ہے۔

جسٹس شاہد وحید نے ایڈووکیٹ جنرل اسلام آباد سے کہا کہ آئندہ سماعت سے قبل تمام ریکارڈ جمع کروایا جائے، ریکارڈ عدالت میں آئے گا تو خفیہ نہیں رہے گا، بہنوں کی ملاقات کے حوالے سے کیا کہتے ہیں؟

جس پر ایڈووکیٹ جنرل اسلام آباد نے کہا کہ اگر کوئی قانون کی خلاف ورزی کرے گا تو ملاقات نہیں ہو گی۔

جسٹس شاہد وحید نے کہا کہ اگر وہ قانون کی خلاف ورزی کر رہا ہے تو آپ بھی کریں گے؟ بہنوں سے ملاقات کوئی احسان نہیں، ان کا بنیادی حق ہے، ریاست کا کام نہیں کہ قانون کی خلاف ورزی کرے، اسلام آباد ہائی کورٹ کی ہدایات پر عمل کیوں نہیں ہو رہا؟ ہمیں بانئ پی ٹی آئی کا مکمل ریکارڈ دیں، سمری نہیں چاہیے۔

جسٹس نعیم اختر افغان نے ایڈووکیٹ جنرل اسلام آباد سے کہا کہ آپ کی رپورٹ میں لکھا ہوا ہے کہ انجیوگرافی کرانی ہے، کیا جیل میں انجیوگرافی ہو سکتی ہے؟

ایڈووکیٹ جنرل اسلام آباد نے بتایا کہ باہر اسپتال سے ہو سکتی ہے۔

جسٹس شاہد وحید نے کہا کہ بانئ پی ٹی آئی کی نہ نبض نارمل ہے، نہ ہی دل، میڈیکل رپورٹس کے مطابق ان کے وائیٹل آرگنز متاثر ہونا شروع ہو گئے ہیں۔

ایڈووکیٹ جنرل اسلام آباد نے عدالت کو بتایا کہ 3 سال میں بانئ پی ٹی آئی سے بہنوں کی 48 ملاقاتیں کروائی گئیں۔

جس کے بعد سپریم کورٹ نے بانئ پی ٹی آئی سے بہنوں کی ملاقاتوں کی تمام تفصیلات طلب کر لیں اور 3 سال میں ہونے والی ملاقاتوں کا ریکارڈ بھی طلب کر لیا۔

عدالت نے بانئ پی ٹی آئی سے ملاقات کے کیس کی سماعت گرمیوں کی چھٹیوں کے بعد تک ملتوی کر دی۔

We are mindful of the constitutional and legal obligation of the State, and consequently of the Court, to safeguard the life, health, dignity and security of persons in custody. A prisoner does not, by reason of his incarceration, cease to be entitled to humane treatment and necessary medical care. Accordingly, as an interim arrangement and without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, we are inclined to issue the following directions, which shall be complied with by the respondents, including the Government, its officers and agencies, in letter and spirit until the next date of hearing:

i. The concerned officer/Government shall, through a proper application, place before this Court the complete medical record of the petitioner, including all medical tests and reports, prescriptions, medical opinions, examination reports and details of the treatment administered to him from the date of his arrest until the present date.

ii. The concerned officer/Government, through the learned Advocate General, shall also furnish details of all meetings held during the preceding three months between the prisoner, Imran Ahmed Khan Niazi, and his family members and lawyers.

iii. The concerned officer/Government shall furnish complete details of all cases in which the prisoner is accused, arrested, facing trial, or has been convicted and sentenced.

iv. The prisoner shall, within the next two days, be shifted to Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad.

v. The concerned officer/Government, in consultation and coordination with the management of Shifa International Hospital, shall constitute a medical board comprising a physician, a general surgeon, a specialist in internal medicine, an eye specialist and a cardiologist for the medical examination and treatment of the prisoner.

vi. Dr. Faisal Sultan and one of the prisoner’s sisters, namely Dr. Uzma Khan, shall be permitted to remain associated with the prisoner’s medical examination and treatment.

vii. The necessary expenses relating to the treatment and facilities provided by Shifa International Hospital shall be borne by the prisoner or his family members.

viii. Until the next date of hearing, none of the prisoner’s family members, members of his political party, or lawyers associated with him shall disclose or share his health condition or medical reports with the media or the public at large.

ix. The concerned Government and its relevant officers shall facilitate meetings between the prisoner and his family members once in a week.

x. The concerned Government and its relevant officers shall also facilitate the prisoner in speaking telephonically with his sons twice a week.

In order to maintain law and order and to prevent any untoward incident, the following further directions are issued:

a) The prisoner’s political party and his family members shall ensure that no public gathering takes place within the premises of Shifa International Hospital.

b) The prisoner, or any person related to or associated with him in any capacity, shall not use the medical reports or information concerning his health as an instrument for political gain.

c) In the event of non-compliance with any of the directions contained herein, such non-compliance shall be viewed strictly and the facilities granted under this order may be withdrawn forthwith.

d) In the event that the Government or any of its functionaries has any complaint regarding the misuse of the facilities granted under this order, the Government or the concerned officer shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before this Court. Likewise, if the prisoner or his family members have any grievance concerning the implementation of this order, they shall also be at liberty to move an appropriate application before this Court.e) The Government shall make adequate security arrangements for the entire period during which the prisoner remains at Shifa International Hospital for treatment.

The complete medical reports of the examination and treatment of the prisoner at Shifa International Hospital shall be placed before this Court on the next date of hearing.

Crl.A.400/2025
Mashal Azam v. Ghafoor Anjum, Superintendent Central Jail, Adyala, tehsil and district Rawalpindi and others
Mr. Justice Shahid Waheed
18-08-2026

It is with profound sorrow that I have learnt of the passing of the beloved mother of my respected senior, Syed Ajmal Ma...
06/08/2026

It is with profound sorrow that I have learnt of the passing of the beloved mother of my respected senior, Syed Ajmal Mahmood Shah, former Senior Vice President of the High Court Bar, Rawalpindi Bench. I extend my deepest and most heartfelt condolences to Shah g and his entire family on this irreparable loss. May Almighty Allah (SWT) forgive her shortcomings, envelop her in His infinite mercy, grant her the highest ranks in Jannat-ul-Firdaws, and bless my respected senior, Syed Ajmal Mahmood Shah, and his family with patience, strength, and steadfast faith during this time of immense grief. Indeed, to Allah we belong, and to Him we shall return. (Inna Lillahi wa Inna Ilayhi Raji'un). Ameen.
03335575689

01/08/2026

Types of Police Reports (Challans) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898: Judicial Commentary
Prefatory Note
Although the nomenclature and classification of police reports (commonly referred to as challans) may vary under the Police Rules and administrative practices of different Provinces, the governing legal principles emanate from Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 ("CrPC"), and the judicial pronouncements interpreting the same. The following is a concise exposition of the principal categories of police reports recognized in criminal practice.
1. Complete Challan (Complete Police Report)
Definition
A Complete Challan is the Police Report submitted upon conclusion of the investigation, after the investigating agency has collected all available evidence, recorded the statements of witnesses, secured the necessary medico-legal and forensic reports, identified the accused, and compiled all material documents required for prosecution.
Judicial Commentary
A Complete Challan constitutes the principal Police Report contemplated by Section 173 CrPC. Upon its submission, the Court is required to examine whether sufficient grounds exist for proceeding against the accused in accordance with law. Where the material placed before the Court discloses a prima facie case, the matter proceeds to trial. Such report ordinarily comprises the statements of witnesses, documentary evidence, recovery memos, medical and forensic reports, and every other document relied upon by the prosecution.
2. Incomplete Challan (Interim Police Report)
Definition
Where the investigation remains incomplete but the statutory period prescribed for submission of the Police Report is about to expire, or circumstances otherwise necessitate an immediate report to the Court, the investigating agency may submit an Interim or Incomplete Challan.
Judicial Commentary
The object of an Interim Challan is not to conclude the investigation but to prevent undue delay in criminal proceedings. The remaining investigation is thereafter completed, and any additional material is placed before the Court by means of a Supplementary Challan under Section 173(8) CrPC.
3. Supplementary Challan (Section 173(8) CrPC)
Definition
Where, after submission of the original Police Report, fresh evidence, additional witnesses, newly discovered accused persons, or other material facts emerge, the investigating agency may conduct further investigation and submit a Supplementary Challan.
Judicial Commentary
Section 173(8) CrPC expressly preserves the authority of the investigating agency to undertake further investigation even after submission of the original Police Report. A Supplementary Challan neither supersedes nor invalidates the original report; rather, both reports constitute a composite record and must be read harmoniously. Supplementary reports commonly arise upon receipt of forensic analyses, DNA reports, expert opinions, or discovery of additional incriminating evidence.
4. Cancellation Report
Definition
Where the investigation reveals that no offence is made out or that continuation of the criminal proceedings lacks legal justification, the investigating agency may recommend cancellation of the First Information Report by submitting a Cancellation Report before the competent Court.
Judicial Commentary
The opinion of the investigating agency is merely recommendatory and is not binding upon the Court. The Court may accept the recommendation, reject it, direct further investigation, or take cognizance of the offence independently if the material available justifies such course. The ultimate determination rests exclusively within the judicial domain.
5. Untraced Report (A-Class)
Definition
An Untraced Report is submitted where the commission of the offence is established but the offender cannot be identified or apprehended despite diligent investigation.
Judicial Commentary
Such a report does not dispute the occurrence of the offence. It merely records the inability of the investigating agency to trace or identify the perpetrator. Should the offender subsequently be identified or arrested, the investigation and prosecution may lawfully be revived.
6. False Case Report (B-Class)
Definition
Where the investigation affirmatively establishes that the complaint was false, malicious, or instituted with ulterior motives, the investigating agency may submit a B-Class Report.
Judicial Commentary
A B-Class Report signifies more than a mere deficiency of evidence; it embodies the investigating agency's conclusion that the complaint itself was knowingly false or actuated by mala fides. Upon acceptance of such report, the Court may, where circumstances so warrant, initiate proceedings against the complainant in accordance with law. Nevertheless, the Court is not bound by the investigative opinion and may independently evaluate the material before it.
7. Further Investigation Report (Section 173(8) CrPC)
Definition
A Further Investigation Report is the report submitted upon completion of additional investigation undertaken under Section 173(8) CrPC, whether on the initiative of the investigating agency or pursuant to judicial directions.
Judicial Commentary
In practice, the expressions "Further Investigation Report" and "Supplementary Challan" are frequently employed interchangeably. Such report merely supplements the original Police Report and does not extinguish or replace it. Both reports collectively constitute the prosecution record for purposes of judicial consideration.
8. Absconder Challan
Definition
Where an accused absconds and is declared a Proclaimed Offender by the competent Court, the investigating agency may submit an Absconder Challan in respect of such accused.
Judicial Commentary
The pendency of proceedings against an absconding accused does not impede the prosecution of co-accused who are available before the Court. Upon subsequent arrest or surrender, the proclaimed offender may be tried separately in accordance with law.
9. Split Challan
Definition
A Split Challan is submitted where, in the same criminal case, some accused have been apprehended while others continue to abscond.
Judicial Commentary
This procedure enables the Court to proceed against the accused who are before it without awaiting the apprehension of absconding co-accused, thereby preventing avoidable delay in the administration of criminal justice.
10. Challan in Respect of an Accused in Custody
Definition
This is a Police Report submitted where the accused remains in judicial or police custody at the time of filing of the Challan.
Judicial Commentary
Upon submission of such report, the Court considers matters relating to remand, judicial custody, framing of charge, and commencement of trial. The investigating agency is under a statutory obligation to submit the report within the prescribed period, failing which the rights of the accused under the law may be affected.
11. Challan in Respect of an Accused on Bail
Definition
Where the accused has been admitted to pre-arrest or post-arrest bail, the Police Report is submitted while the accused continues to enjoy the concession of bail.
Judicial Commentary
Submission of the Challan does not, by itself, operate to cancel the bail. The Court retains jurisdiction to maintain, modify, or revoke the order of bail upon consideration of the material placed before it. The accused remains under a continuing obligation to appear before the Court whenever required.
12. Electronic or Digital Challan
Definition
An Electronic or Digital Challan is a Police Report prepared, maintained, and submitted through an electronic or computerized case management system.
Judicial Commentary
The adoption of electronic case management promotes transparency, efficiency, accountability, and preservation of official records. With the gradual implementation of e-governance and digital judicial systems, electronic submission of Police Reports has assumed increasing significance in the administration of criminal justice.
Concluding Principle
The fundamental object of Section 173 CrPC is to ensure that, upon completion of the investigation, the investigating agency places before the competent Court a fair, complete, and comprehensive Police Report, thereby enabling the Court to determine whether sufficient legal grounds exist to proceed with the prosecution. The submission of the Police Report marks the culmination of the investigative process; however, it does not preclude further investigation. Where subsequent facts or evidence come to light, Section 173(8) CrPC expressly authorizes the investigating agency to conduct further investigation and to submit a Supplementary Police Report, which forms part of the original record and must be considered together therewith.
Clarificatory Note
As a matter of established criminal practice, the expressions "Supplementary Challan" and "Further Investigation Report" generally denote the same legal concept founded upon Section 173(8) CrPC.

Address

Near Post Office District Courts Rawalpindi
Rawalpindi

Telephone

+923478222337

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Ch. Ejaz Khatana Advocate posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Ch. Ejaz Khatana Advocate:

Shortcuts

Share