A.S.K Law Associates

A.S.K Law Associates Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from A.S.K Law Associates, Lawyer & Law Firm, A. S. K Law Associates, Ground Floor, Khursheed Building, 10 Abbott Road, near Dunya News Building, Lahore.

💦✍️A.S.K LAW ASSOCIATE✍️💦

A.S.K Law Associates is a Lahore-based legal practice founded by 🎓Aamer Sohail Khan, Advocate High Court, an experienced legal practitioner with more than 25 years of professional standing in the legal fraternity of Pakistan.

29/08/2026

2026 SCMR 1-
Overview..
Ambreen Akram v. Asad Ullah Khan & others
Held: The Supreme Court ruled that a Muslim wife's right to maintenance (nafaqah) arises from the solemnization of a valid Nikah and is not dependent upon rukhsati or consummation of marriage.

Key points:

Valid Nikah creates the husband's obligation to maintain his wife.

Non-consummation alone is not a ground to deny maintenance.

Rukhsati does not postpone the wife's legal entitlement.

If the husband alleges that the wife unjustifiably refused to live with him, the burden is on the husband to prove it.

Ratio: Maintenance is ordinarily payable from the date of valid marriage, irrespective of whether rukhsati or consummation has occurred.

Citation: 2026 SCMR 1.

29/08/2026
🎓2026 SCMR 1063🎓"M. Imran v. Ishfaq Ahmed"Short Overview:🎓Where an agreement to sell fixes a definite date for payment o...
27/08/2026

🎓2026 SCMR 1063🎓"M. Imran v. Ishfaq Ahmed"

Short Overview:

🎓Where an agreement to sell fixes a definite date for payment of the balance consideration, the purchaser must establish continuous readiness and willingness and cannot rely merely on a verbal assertion. Failure to tender the balance within the stipulated time, coupled with absence of contemporaneous evidence of funds, may defeat specific performance.

2026 SCMR 994 - OverviewMst. Safia Khanum & others v. Additional District Judge-II East, Islamabad & others, decided on ...
26/08/2026

2026 SCMR 994 - Overview
Mst. Safia Khanum & others v. Additional District Judge-II East, Islamabad & others, decided on 7 January 2026.

The Supreme Court held that:

A third/fresh suit on the same cause of action is barred where an earlier suit was withdrawn/dismissed and no permission to file a fresh suit was obtained under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC.

A party cannot abandon one legal remedy/forum and subsequently pursue another for the same cause of action; this attracts the doctrine of election.

Order II Rule 2 CPC, read with Article 114 Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, can bar such subsequent proceedings.

In the circumstances, the Supreme Court refused leave to appeal and dismissed the petition.

Case Overview Citation: 2016 SCMR 1439"Abdul Hafeez versus The State"Court: Supreme Court of PakistanSubject: Criminal P...
25/08/2026

Case Overview Citation:

2016 SCMR 1439

"Abdul Hafeez versus The State"
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Subject: Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.), Section 497 and Pakistan Penal Code (PPC), Section 489-F (dishonestly issuing a cheque).
Key Legal Principle:-

Deterrence vs. Recovery:

It reinforces that Section 489-F PPC is meant to penalize a criminal act rather than function as a recovery mechanism for outstanding financial dues, which are more appropriately pursued via civil remedies.

"Justice is not merely a principle; it is a responsibility entrusted to those who practice law.”
25/08/2026

"Justice is not merely a principle; it is a responsibility entrusted to those who practice law.”

At office...
25/08/2026

At office...

Address

A. S. K Law Associates, Ground Floor, Khursheed Building, 10 Abbott Road, Near Dunya News Building
Lahore
54000

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when A.S.K Law Associates posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share