30/01/2026
Supreme Court has prohibited the use of the phrase “Bakhidmat Janaab SHO” in applications addressed to police officials, describing it as a remnant of the colonial era.
The verdict, authored by Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, observed that such language reflects an outdated mindset inconsistent with the role of public servants in a modern democratic system.
The issue was raised during proceedings when a Judicial Law Clerk, Muhammad Subhan Malik on Court's call, pointed out the widespread practice of addressing station house officers with the said phrase. He explained that “Bakhidmat” translates to “at service of”, adding that “it is not the citizen in service of the SHO, but the SHO in service of the citizen.” The Judicial law clerk further highlighted that the terms Complainant and Informant are often used interchangeably, even in FIR matters, a practice the Court termed incorrect.
Agreeing with the submission, the judgment authored by Justice Salahuddin Panhwar observed that from now on, the for addressing the SHO, "Janaab SHO" is sufficient. The Court further observed that the term Complainant would only apply to a person filing a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C, while the person lodging an FIR would be regarded as an Informant.
The 19 page verdict also barred the use of the term “Faryaadi” in police proceedings, observing that it conveys the impression of a citizen seeking mercy rather than exercising a legal right. It noted that the word, of Persian origin, refers to one who cries for help.
In addition, the Court interpreted Section 201 of the Pakistan Penal Code, warning that police officers delaying the registration of FIRs could face prosecution under the provision. The judgment observed that delay in registration hampers the timely commencement of investigation and may result in the loss or deterioration of vital forensic evidence.
The judgement is announced on Jan 30, 2026.