Adv Fida Nasar

Adv Fida Nasar Brave are those Who dare to choose the law

16/05/2026

*“ انہوں نے مجھ سے جھوٹے بیان دلوائے ہیں ، مجھ پر تشدد کیا گیا، مجھے کہا جا رہا ہے کہ بنی گالہ کے ایک بندے کا نام لو، ورنہ آپ کی فیملی کو اٹھا کر لیں جائیں گے” انمول عرف پنکی کا عدالت میں بیان*


#پنکی
#انمول
#عدالت‌وانصاف

Why Good Cases Still Lose in Court.Being right isn’t always enough—strategy, timing, and evidence often decide the outco...
07/05/2026

Why Good Cases Still Lose in Court.
Being right isn’t always enough—strategy, timing, and evidence often decide the outcome.
Cases can fail because of:
✔️ Weak documentation
✔️ Procedural mistakes
✔️ Insufficient evidence
✔️ Delayed legal action
In law, preparation can be just as powerful as the truth itself.

See less

2026 S C M R 47[Supreme Court of Pakistan]Present: Athar Minallah, Irfan Saadat Khan and Malik Shahzad Ahmad Khan, JJIMR...
30/04/2026

2026 S C M R 47

[Supreme Court of Pakistan]

Present: Athar Minallah, Irfan Saadat Khan and Malik Shahzad Ahmad Khan, JJ

IMRAN ---Petitioner

Versus

The STATE ---Respondent

Ss. 302(b) & 34---Qatl-i-amd, common intention---Reappraisal of evidence---Medical evidence---Joint role of causing firearm injuries---Petitioner-accused was charged that he along with his co-accused committed murder of the brother of complainant---Record showed that a joint role of making fire shots was assigned to petitioner and co-accused---No specific injury on the body of the deceased was attributed topetitioner---As per postmortem report, there were eight (08) entry and eight (08) exit wounds on the body of the deceased and all the entry wounds on the body of the deceased were of the same size i.e., 1/4 x 1/4 inches, which fact showed that one firearm was used in this case to commit the murder of deceased and the occurrence was committed by one person---No specific injury was attributed to petitioner and a joint role of causing firearm injuries was attributed to petitioner and co-accused, therefore, it was not determinable in this case that as to whether the said injuries on the body of the deceased were caused by petitioner or co-accused, which fact created a serious doubt in the prosecution case, hence the petitioner was liable to be acquitted while extending him the benefit of doubt---Circumstances establishedthat the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the petitioner beyond the shadow of doubt---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.




Trusted Legal Solutions. ⚖️At Alliance Law, we provide comprehensive legal services with professionalism, integrity, and...
30/04/2026

Trusted Legal Solutions. ⚖️

At Alliance Law, we provide comprehensive legal services with professionalism, integrity, and dedication. From corporate matters to family disputes, constitutional issues to criminal defense — our experienced legal team is committed to protecting your rights and delivering strategic legal solutions.
📍 Lahore Office: House No. 97, Bridge Colony, Abid Majeed Road, Lahore Cantt
📍 Islamabad Office: 1B, Mezzanine Floor, Awan Arcade, Nazim-ud-Din Road, Blue Area

📧 [email protected]

📞 Lahore: 042-36617097
📞 Islamabad: 051-2813107

Your legal matters deserve experienced counsel and unwavering representation.
Alliance Law — Where Law Meets Trust.

Looking for reliable legal representation? Alliance Law Associates provides comprehensive legal services for individuals...
27/04/2026

Looking for reliable legal representation? Alliance Law Associates provides comprehensive legal services for individuals and corporations alike. Whether it’s a complex tax matter or a family dispute, our expert advocates are here to ensure your rights are protected.

Our Core Practice Areas:
🔹 Company Matters & Advisory
🔹 Litigation & Dispute Services
🔹 Family & Criminal Law
🔹 Taxation & Banking Matters
🔹 Legal Advisory & Mediation

Connecting you with justice across Lahore and Islamabad.

Alliance Law Firm & Consultants is dedicated to upholding the rule of law and delivering excellence in every forum. From...
23/04/2026

Alliance Law Firm & Consultants is dedicated to upholding the rule of law and delivering excellence in every forum. From the courtroom to the boardroom, our team is committed to providing strategic and result-oriented legal solutions tailored to your unique needs.

We take pride in our expertise across diverse practice areas. Our seasoned advocates and consultants are equipped to handle complex cases in the following fields:

⚖️ Litigation & Dispute Resolution
🏢 Corporate & Commercial Law
👨‍👩‍👧 Family & Civil Matters
💰 Taxation & Banking Law
📕 Criminal & Constitutional Law

Whether you are an individual seeking justice or a corporation navigating regulatory challenges, Alliance Law is your trusted legal partner.

Contact us today to schedule a consultation.
📍 Lahore Office: House No. 97, Bridge Colony, Abid Majeed Road, Lahore Cantt
📧 [email protected]
| ☎ 042-36617097
📍 Islamabad Office: 1B, Mezzanine Floor, Awan Arcade, Nazim-ud-Din Road, Blue Area
📧 [email protected]
| ☎ 051-2813107
Professional. Responsive. Trusted Legal Support.

We are a trusted law firm providing reliable legal services to individuals, businesses, and organizations. Our experienc...
20/04/2026

We are a trusted law firm providing reliable legal services to individuals, businesses, and organizations. Our experienced lawyers are committed to offering practical and effective solutions for your legal needs.

At ALAC, we understand that legal matters can be complex and stressful. That’s why we focus on clear communication and personal attention, so you feel confident at every step.

We believe in building strong relationships based on trust, honesty, and respect. Our team carefully understands your situation and works to achieve the best possible outcome for you.

Most of our cases are time-sensitive and complex, so we act quickly and efficiently to protect your rights.

Contact us today to consult with our team. Let ALAC guide you with trusted legal support.








---S. 265-D---Charge, framing of---Trial Court, duty of---Object and purpose of section 265-D, Cr.P.C. stated.Section 26...
17/04/2026

---S. 265-D---Charge, framing of---Trial Court, duty of---Object and purpose of section 265-D, Cr.P.C. stated.

Section 265-D, Cr.P.C casts a duty upon the Trial Court to frame a charge. A charge is a gist and precise statement of the allegation(s) made against a person(s), which is the foundation of a criminal trial. It specifies the offence with which an accused is charged, by giving a specific name, if any, and the relevant provision(s) of law(s). Section 265-D provides that before framing of a charge, the Court must consider the FIR, the police report, all the documents, and the statements of the witnesses filed by the prosecution available before it in order to determine whether it has jurisdiction to take cognizance of the matter. If the Court is of the opinion that it is competent to take cognizance and prima facie reasonable grounds exist for proceeding with the trial of the accused, only then, charge has to be framed. Its object and purpose are to enable the Court to initiate judicial proceedings against an accused. It is a fundamental right of the accused to know the exact allegation(s) and offence(s) with which they are charged, in order to defend themselves so as to prevent prejudice. Upon considering all the material available before it, if the Court is of the opinion that it lacks jurisdiction and sufficient material or there exist no grounds for proceeding with the trial of the accused, it should refrain itself from framing charge, so as to avoid a purposeless and frivolous prosecution and abuse of process of the Court.

دفعہ 265-D ضابطہ فوجداری (Cr.P.C) — فردِ جرم کی تشکیل، مقصد اور عدالتِ ٹرائل کی ذمہ داری
دفعہ 265-D کے تحت ٹرائل کورٹ پر یہ ذمہ داری عائد ہوتی ہے کہ وہ ملزم کے خلاف فردِ جرم (Charge) عائد کرے۔ فردِ جرم دراصل الزامات کا ایک مختصر اور واضح بیان ہوتا ہے جو کسی بھی فوجداری مقدمے کی بنیاد بنتا ہے۔ اس میں یہ بتایا جاتا ہے کہ ملزم پر کون سا جرم عائد کیا جا رہا ہے، اس جرم کا مخصوص نام کیا ہے (اگر موجود ہو) اور متعلقہ قانونی دفعات کون سی ہیں۔
اس دفعہ کے مطابق، فردِ جرم عائد کرنے سے پہلے عدالت کو درج ذیل مواد کا جائزہ لینا ضروری ہوتا ہے:

ایف آئی آر

پولیس رپورٹ

تمام متعلقہ دستاویزات

استغاثہ کے گواہوں کے بیانات

یہ جائزہ اس لیے لیا جاتا ہے تاکہ عدالت یہ تعین کر سکے کہ:

آیا اسے اس مقدمے کا نوٹس لینے (cognizance) کا اختیار حاصل ہے یا نہیں؛

آیا ملزم کے خلاف ٹرائل چلانے کے لیے بادی النظر (prima facie) معقول بنیادیں موجود ہیں یا نہیں۔

اگر عدالت اس نتیجے پر پہنچے کہ اس کے پاس اختیار بھی موجود ہے اور ملزم کے خلاف کافی ابتدائی شواہد بھی ہیں، تو وہ فردِ جرم عائد کرے گی۔
مقصد و غرض:
اس دفعہ کا بنیادی مقصد یہ ہے کہ عدالت باقاعدہ عدالتی کارروائی کا آغاز کرے اور ملزم کو واضح طور پر یہ معلوم ہو کہ اس پر کون سے الزامات ہیں، تاکہ وہ مؤثر دفاع کر سکے اور کسی قسم کی ناانصافی یا تعصب سے بچا جا سکے۔ یہ ملزم کا ایک بنیادی حق ہے کہ اسے اپنے خلاف لگائے گئے الزامات کی مکمل اور واضح معلومات دی جائیں۔
تاہم، اگر عدالت یہ سمجھے کہ:

اسے مقدمے کی سماعت کا اختیار حاصل نہیں، یا

ملزم کے خلاف کوئی معقول بنیاد یا شواہد موجود نہیں

تو اسے فردِ جرم عائد کرنے سے گریز کرنا چاہیے، تاکہ بلا وجہ اور فضول مقدمہ بازی (frivolous litigation) سے بچا جا سکے اور عدالت کے عمل کا ناجائز استعمال نہ ہو۔





13/04/2026

پہلی درخواست ضمانت بغیر بحث کیے واپس لی گئی۔ دوسری درخواست ضمانت اسی عدالت کے روبرو قابل سماعت ہے۔
Since no arguments were previously advanced, nor was there any decision of the High Court on merits, therefore, in the interest of justice,the matter is remanded to the High Court for decision of the subsequent bail application on merits, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the parties. It is expected that the learned High Court will decide the matter preferably within a period of two weeks after receiving a copy of this order.

Criminal Petition No. 496 of 2026
Muhammad Faisal Versus The State



13/04/2026

2026YLR 564
PLJ 2025 Cr.C 470
According to the dictums laid down by Honourable Superior Courts holding of identification parade is not a legal requirement in each and every case. Any fact in any form, which establishes the identity of accused is relevant under Article 22 of Qanun-e-Shahadat. In the case in hand accused/petitioners were visible on CCTV camera recorded clips. The said piece of evidence was admissible under Article 22 of Qanun-e-Shahadat. It was also to be considered under Article 164 of Qanune-Shahadat Order being an evidence through modern device subject to(naeem) its genuineness and authenticity. In my humble view there was no need of holding of identification parade in the present case in the light of availability of said piece of evidence.
Crl. Misc. No.15084-B/2025.
Shahbaz Mustafa and another. Vs State



Address

Islamabad
0824

Opening Hours

Monday 09:00 - 17:00
Tuesday 09:00 - 17:00
Wednesday 09:00 - 17:00
Thursday 09:00 - 17:00
Friday 09:00 - 17:00
Saturday 09:00 - 17:00
Sunday 09:00 - 17:00

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Adv Fida Nasar posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Adv Fida Nasar:

Share