Aguirre Law Office - Greenhills, San Juan City

  • Home
  • Aguirre Law Office - Greenhills, San Juan City
Call

Aguirre Law Office - Greenhills, San Juan City Your trusted attorneys for Corporate, Civil, Criminal, Labor laws and Notarial Services.

Email Address: [email protected]
Contact numbers: (0953) 712 2798 / Landline (02)8743-8132

Soriano v. Estrella, G.R. No. 236333, April 20, 2026Case summary: Estrella filed an unlawful detainer case after Soriano...
06/10/2026

Soriano v. Estrella, G.R. No. 236333, April 20, 2026

Case summary: Estrella filed an unlawful detainer case after Soriano and her relatives refused to vacate property they occupied with his permission. They challenged his legal capacity to sue, presenting a death certificate stating that he had died in 1990. The Supreme Court upheld Estrella’s right to possession because his living presence and undisputed identity overcame the presumption arising from the death certificate. Their possession became unlawful upon withdrawal of his permission and refusal to vacate, and the action was timely filed.

Legal doctrine: A court hearing an ejectment case may provisionally determine whether a party is alive or dead when necessary to resolve legal capacity to sue and the right to physical possession. That finding applies only to the ejectment case; it does not cancel or correct the death certificate, which requires a separate proceeding.

——————————-

Case Summary: Nagsampa si Estrella ng unlawful detainer case matapos tumangging umalis sina Soriano at ang kanyang mga kamag-anak sa property na tinitirhan nila nang may pahintulot niya. Kinuwestiyon nila ang legal capacity ni Estrella na magsampa ng kaso at nagpakita ng death certificate na nagsasabing namatay siya noong 1990.

Pinaboran ng Supreme Court si Estrella. Ang kanyang aktuwal na pagharap at ang hindi pinagtatalunang pagkakakilanlan niya ay sapat upang mapabulaanan ang presumption mula sa death certificate. Naging unlawful ang pananatili nina Soriano nang bawiin ni Estrella ang kanyang pahintulot at tumanggi silang umalis. Na-file din ang kaso sa loob ng itinakdang panahon.

Legal doctrine: Sa isang ejectment case, maaaring provisionally o pansamantalang tukuyin ng korte kung buhay o patay ang isang partido kung kailangan ito upang maresolba ang kanyang legal capacity na magsampa ng kaso at ang karapatan sa physical possession ng property. Para lamang sa ejectment case ang finding na ito. Hindi nito kinakansela o kinokorek ang death certificate; kailangan ng hiwalay na proceeding para rito.

Source: Supreme Court of the Philippines, Public Information Office.

Forced to resign because of hostile treatment at work?The Supreme Court ruled that demotion, verbal abuse, and indiffere...
26/09/2026

Forced to resign because of hostile treatment at work?

The Supreme Court ruled that demotion, verbal abuse, and indifferent treatment may amount to constructive illegal dismissal when they make working conditions so unbearable that a reasonable employee would feel compelled to resign.

Napilitan ka bang mag-resign dahil sa trato sa iyo sa trabaho?

Ayon sa Supreme Court, ang demotion, verbal abuse, at malamig o mapanakit na pagtrato ng employer ay maaaring maging constructive illegal dismissal kung naging intolerable ang trabaho at ang isang empleyado sa ganoong sitwasyon ay mapipilitang mag-resign.

Aguirre Law Office


Bartolome v. Toyota Quezon Avenue, Inc., G.R. No. 254465, April 3, 2024.

Aguirre Law Office -Greenhills Branch
Unit 406 Jafers Place Bldg., 19 Eisenhower St, Greenhills, San Juan City, Philippines

⚖️ BOUNCING CHECK? NOTICE OF DISHONOR CAN NOW BE SENT ELECTRONICALLY.The Supreme Court has clarified the rules on the se...
18/09/2026

⚖️ BOUNCING CHECK? NOTICE OF DISHONOR CAN NOW BE SENT ELECTRONICALLY.

The Supreme Court has clarified the rules on the service of a Notice of Dishonor in cases involving B.P. Blg. 22 (Bouncing Checks Law).

📱 Email, Viber, Facebook Messenger, and similar electronic platforms may now be valid means of serving a Notice of Dishonor—provided the requirements laid down by the Supreme Court are properly observed.

But sending a message alone may not be enough.

The Supreme Court requires safeguards to establish valid service, including proof that the electronic account belongs to the issuer and preservation of evidence such as screenshots, messages, delivery/read receipts, and chat histories. An affidavit of service should likewise document how the notice was served.

⚠️ Whether you issued a dishonored check or received one, proper service of the Notice of Dishonor can be crucial in a B.P. 22 case.

Before filing a case—or responding to one—know your rights and legal options.

AGUIRRE LAW OFFICE – Greenhills Branch
Unit 406, Jafer Place Bldg.
#19 Eisenhower St., North Greenhills, San Juan City

📩 Send us a message to schedule a legal consultation.

NOTE: This post is for general legal information only and does not constitute legal advice. Each case must be evaluated based on its particular facts and circumstances.

Kailangan ba ng psychologist’s report para mapatunayan ang psychological violence?Sa ### v. People and AAA, sinabi ng Su...
15/09/2026

Kailangan ba ng psychologist’s report para mapatunayan ang psychological violence?

Sa ### v. People and AAA, sinabi ng Supreme Court: not always. Maaaring sapat ang credible testimony ng victim para mapatunayan ang mental o emotional anguish.

Legal takeaway: Hindi awtomatikong kailangan ang psychological evaluation sa bawat Anti-VAWC case. Evidence is assessed based on the circumstances of each case.

For general legal information only. Hindi ito legal advice.

Source: Supreme Court of the Philippines
https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/sc-psychological-evaluation-not-required-to-prove-psychological-violence-under-anti-vawc-act/

Sapat ba ang testimony ng relatives at friends para patunayan ang psychological incapacity?Sa Green v. Green, sinabi ng ...
14/09/2026

Sapat ba ang testimony ng relatives at friends para patunayan ang psychological incapacity?

Sa Green v. Green, sinabi ng Supreme Court na maaaring makatulong ang kanilang testimony kapag isinama sa totality of the evidence. Hindi rin indispensable ang personal examination ng allegedly incapacitated spouse.

Legal takeaway: Tinitingnan ng korte ang kabuuan ng ebidensya, hindi lamang isang testimony o psychological evaluation.

For general legal information only. Hindi ito legal advice.

Source: Supreme Court of the Philippines
https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/sc-family-and-friends-testimonies-can-prove-psychological-incapacity-in-nullity-of-marriage-cases/

12/09/2026

Honored to have Aguirre Law Office and Aguirre Optical Eye Clinic invited to the Subic Bay Taiwan Chamber of Commerce gathering.

Grateful for the warm welcome and the opportunity to once again connect with the Subic Bay business community.

⚖️ PAREHO NANG GUSTONG TAPUSIN NG MAG-ASAWA ANG KANILANG PAGSASAMA — COLLUSION NA BA ITO?Hindi agad.Nilinaw ng Korte Sup...
12/09/2026

⚖️ PAREHO NANG GUSTONG TAPUSIN NG MAG-ASAWA ANG KANILANG PAGSASAMA — COLLUSION NA BA ITO?

Hindi agad.

Nilinaw ng Korte Suprema na ang kagustuhan ng parehong mag-asawa na wakasan ang kanilang kasal ay hindi sapat, sa sarili lamang nito, upang patunayang may collusion o sabwatan sa annulment case.

Kahit pareho silang sumasang-ayon sa grounds ng kaso, o hindi tumututol ang isang asawa sa petition, hindi ito awtomatikong nangangahulugan na nagsabwatan sila upang linlangin ang hukuman.

Ang "collusion" ay nangangailangan ng patunay na mayroong hindi wastong kasunduan o sabwatan—gaya ng paggawa ng hindi totoong ebidensya, maling paglalahad ng mga pangyayari, pagtatago ng ebidensya, o hindi paglalahad ng isang valid na depensa—upang makakuha ng paborableng desisyon mula sa hukuman.

Sa madaling salita:

Ang pagkakasundo ng mag-asawa na gusto na nilang wakasan ang kanilang kasal ay iba sa pagsasabwatan upang linlangin ang hukuman.

📌 Republic v. Wong, G.R. No. 276986, February 3, 2026

May mga katanungan tungkol sa annulment, declaration of nullity of marriage, legal separation, o iba pang usapin sa Family Law?Makabubuting kumonsulta sa abogado upang malaman ang tamang legal na hakbang batay sa inyong sitwasyon.

AGUIRRE LAW OFFICE – Greenhills Branch
📍 Unit 406, Jafer Place Bldg., #19 Eisenhower St., North Greenhills, San Juan City

Your Legal Partner Always.

For legal information only. Ang bawat kaso ay may magkakaibang facts at circumstances.

📚⚖️ CASE DIGEST DROP: LAMBINO v. COMELECCan the people change the Constitution through a people’s initiative? 👀In Lambin...
11/09/2026

📚⚖️ CASE DIGEST DROP: LAMBINO v. COMELEC

Can the people change the Constitution through a people’s initiative? 👀

In Lambino v. COMELEC, the Supreme Court drew the line between AMENDMENT and REVISION, reminding everyone that a people’s initiative cannot be used to rewrite the fundamental structure of the Constitution.

✍️ The people may propose amendments but there are constitutional rules to follow.

Swipe through the case digest and remember:
Not every constitutional change is an “amendment.” ⚖️

⚖️ LOOKING FOR RELIABLE LEGAL SERVICES?When legal matters arise, having the right legal guidance makes all the differenc...
10/09/2026

⚖️ LOOKING FOR RELIABLE LEGAL SERVICES?

When legal matters arise, having the right legal guidance makes all the difference. Aguirre Law Office – Greenhills Branch is here to provide professional, strategic, efficient, and client-focused legal services.

📌 Our Services Include:
• Legal consultations and advice
• Contract drafting and review
• Demand letters and legal correspondence
• Notarial services
• And other legal services tailored to your needs

Whether you need legal advice, assistance with documents, or guidance on a legal concern, we’re here to help you navigate your legal matters with confidence.

📍 Visit us at:
Aguirre Law Office – Greenhills Branch
Jafer Place, Unit 406, #19 Eisenhower Street, Greenhills, San Juan City, Philippines, 1504

📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 Contact: (0953) 712 2798
☎️ Landline: (02) 8743-8132

Your legal concerns deserve reliable guidance. Let Aguirre Law Office help you find the right legal path. ⚖️

📩 Message us today or visit our Greenhills Branch for your legal needs!

⚖️ What is Unlawful Detainer?An unlawful detainer is a legal action filed to recover possession of a property from a per...
10/09/2026

⚖️ What is Unlawful Detainer?

An unlawful detainer is a legal action filed to recover possession of a property from a person who initially occupied it lawfully but continues to stay after their right to possess it has ended.

It commonly applies when a tenant or occupant refuses to vacate despite a valid demand.

Through an unlawful detainer case, the lawful possessor may seek recovery of the property, unpaid rentals, damages, attorney’s fees, and other appropriate relief.

Address

Jafer Place, Unit 406, #19 Eisenhower Street Greenhills, San Juan City

1504

Opening Hours

Monday 08:30 - 17:00
Tuesday 08:30 - 17:00
Wednesday 08:30 - 17:00
Thursday 08:30 - 17:00
Friday 08:30 - 17:00
Saturday 08:30 - 03:00

Telephone

+639084075000

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Aguirre Law Office - Greenhills, San Juan City posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

  • Want your practice to be the top-listed law practice?

Share