Labor Laws and Order

Labor Laws and Order Workers education must not be left out during employment against any violation from there employers.

26/01/2026

Philippine Labor Laws, after 15 years of employment. Is it violation to transfer the employment of employee to a different corporation?

Wheather or not, it is legal for an employer to transfer an employee to another company, even if it is a different corporation, provided it is done in good faith, for a legitimate business purpose, and does not involve a diminution of pay, benefits, or rank.

However, because the transfer is to a different corporation (a sister company or affiliate), this often constitutes a break in employer-employee relations, making it a sensitive issue that can lead to claims of constructive dismissal if not handled properly.

Here is a breakdown of the legality of this situation:

1. Requirements for a Valid Transfer

The Supreme Court has ruled that a transfer is valid only if it is not "unreasonable, inconvenient, or prejudicial to the employee". If the transfer is done in good faith for business expansion or realignment, it is generally considered a valid management prerogative.

For the transfer to be legal, it must meet these criteria:

- No Reduction in Salary/Benefits: Your salary, allowances, and 15 years of accumulated benefits (like retirement, seniority) must be maintained or carried over.

- No Demotion in Rank: You cannot be transferred to a lower position.

- No Bad Faith: The transfer cannot be a way to force you to resign (constructive dismissal) or a form of punishment.

- No Unreasonable Inconvenience: The new location or work conditions cannot be excessively difficult compared to your current setup.

- The "Different Corporation" Issue

When you move from Company A to Company B (a different corporation), you are technically ending your contract with Company A and starting a new one with Company B.

- Continuity of Service: Your 15 years of service must be recognized by the new company for purposes of seniority, retirement, and other tenure-based benefits. If the new company treats you as a "new" employee with zero tenure, this is illegal.

- Consent: Because it is a new legal entity, your consent is generally required for the transfer of your employment contract, unless your original contract specifically authorized transfer to affiliates.

3. What to Check

- Your Contract: Check if your employment contract includes a clause stating you agree to be assigned to affiliates or sister companies.

- The New Contract: Ensure the new contract explicitly states that your 15 years of tenure are recognized.

- The Reason: The employer company must be able to show a legitimate business reason (e.g., closing the old office, moving operations).

4. What Constitutes Constructive Dismissal

If the transfer is to a different company with lower pay, a lower position, or if it makes your commute impossible, you may have a case for constructive dismissal. In such a case, you may be entitled to separation pay, usually one month's pay or at least one-half month's pay for every year of service, whichever is higher, for 15 years of service.

NOTE: If you are affect of the same situation, Consult with a labor lawyer or the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) and National Labor Relation Commission (NLRC) to review the transfer documents, especially to ensure your 15 years of tenure are not wiped out.

03/01/2026
"Dura lex sed lex " “The law is hard, but law.”      The sentence is a literal translation of the Latin legal maxim "Dur...
27/10/2025

"Dura lex sed lex "
“The law is hard, but law.”

The sentence is a literal translation of the Latin legal maxim "Dura lex, sed lex,"
"The law is hard, but law." which means "The law is harsh, but it is the law". While grammatically correct, its meaning is rooted in the idea that the law must be followed even when it seems harsh or unfair, emphasizing the principle of the rule of law.

"Dura lex sed lex" published on by Oxford University Press.

26/10/2025
17/10/2025

You may download the Wage Order copy here:https://nwpc.dole.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Wage-Order-No.-RBXII-25.pdf

08/10/2025
05/09/2025
03/09/2025

TSISMOSA KA BA ?
Narito ang mga kasong Maaaring isampa sayo :

1 . SLANDER - Pagpapahayag na pasalita na nakasira sa reputasyon o karangalan ng isang tao . ( Paninirang puri . )

2 . ORAL DEFAMATION – Maling akusasyon o
malisyosong pahayag na pasalita na nakasira ng reputasyon o karangalan ng isang tao 0 entigridad.

Ugaliing bantayan ang sarili , huwag tsismosa / tsismoso mag ingat baka makulong ka pa !

KASO AT PARUSA PARA SA NAGKAKALAT NG TSISMIS
SLANDER / ORAL DEFAMATION
KULONG:
HANGGANG 1 BUWAN
PENALTY: Php 20,000

GRAVE SLANDER
KULONG: 4 BUWAN AT 1 ARAW - 2 TAON AT 4 BUWAN
PENALTY: Php 20,000 - Php 100,000

04/08/2025
05/07/2025

Nilinaw ng na maaaring kolektahin ng korte ang suweldo ng mga pampublikong opisyal para mabayaran ang kanilang mga utang. Ang mga suweldong ito ay hindi exempted sa garnishment sa ilalim ng kasalukuyang mga batas at tuntunin.

Sa isang desisyon na isinulat ni Associate Justice Samuel H. Gaerlan, nagpasya ang Third Division ng Korte na maaaring ma-garnish o makumpiska para legal na kolektahin ang suweldo ni Atty. Fred L. Bagbagen (Bagbagen) para bayaran ang kanyang utang kay Anna May F. Perez (Perez).

Napawalang-sala ng Regional Trial Court (RTC) sa kasong estafa si Bagbagen pero napatunayan siyang may sibil na pananagutan para bayaran si Perez ng PHP 308,000. Pinayagan ng RTC ang garnishment ng kanyang sweldo na nakadeposito sa Philippine Veterans Bank.

Sinubukan ni Bagbagen na pigilan ang garnishment sa katwiran na ang kanyang mga suweldo ay pondo ng gobyerno hangga’t hindi nagagastos.

Tinanggihan ito RTC na nagsabing hindi na itinuturing na pondo ng gobyerno ang pera kapag ito ay naideposito na sa personal bank account. Sumang-ayon sa RTC ang Court of Appeals (CA).

Pinagtibay ng Korte Suprema ang Desisyon ng CA at RTC. Binigyang diin nito na walang batas na nag-i-exempt sa mga sweldo ng mga opisyal ng gobyerno sa garnishment. Sa ilalim ng Rule 39 ng Rules of Court, ang mga suweldo, parehong pampubliko at pribado, ay maaaring ma-garnish para pambayad sa utang.

May exception para sa mga manual laborer o manggagawa na ang mga sahod ay protektado para matiyak na maaari pa rin nilang suportahan ang kanilang mga pamilya. Paliwanag ng Korte, ang mga manggagawa ay karaniwang umaasa sa kikitain sa isang araw ng trabaho para suportahan ang kanilang pamilya kaya higit silang nangangailangan ng exemption. Pero hanggang apat na buwan lang na halaga ng sahod ang kasama sa exemption. Anumang halaga na higit pa rito ay maaari pa ring kolektahin para bayaran ang mga utang.

Pinapanatili ring mas mahigpit ang pamantayan pagdating sa kita at obligasyon sa pananalapi sa mga pampublikong opisyal dahil sa kanilang tungkulin sa Konstitusyon bilang tagapag-ingat ng tiwala ng publiko.

Basahin ang press release sa https://tinyurl.com/44u5fp2s.

Basahin ang Desisyon sa https://tinyurl.com/4pzbvsv9.

Sumunod sa Credit Attribution Policy ng SC PIO: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/credit-attribution-policy/.


Address

General Santos City

Telephone

+639164253958

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Labor Laws and Order posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Labor Laws and Order:

Share