What are the opening hours?

Monday 8am - 5pm Tuesday 8am - 5pm Wednesday 8am - 5pm Thursday 8am - 5am Friday 8am - 5pm

https://www.facebook.com/100121259572583/

Davao Lawyer and Notary Public, Davao City (2026)

12/08/2026

'OUR CHOICE OF WHO TO LOVE AND NOT LOVE IS A HUMAN RIGHT'

As the Supreme Court on Tuesday concluded its oral arguments on the recognition of foreign divorce between two Filipinos, Senior Associate Justice Marvic Leonen said that the choice of whom to love is a human right.

“Would you agree with me that our capacity to love and our choice of who to love and not love is a human right?” Leonen said during his interpellation of Solicitor General Darlene Berberabe, to which the latter agreed.

Read the whole story here: https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/nation/998113/sc-ends-oral-arguments-on-foreign-divorce-leonen-says-who-to-love-is-human-right/story/

11/08/2026

⚖️ A FALSE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE IS NOT “JUST A PIECE OF PAPER”

Under Articles 174 and 175 of the Revised Penal Code, criminal liability may arise not only from issuing or falsifying a certificate but also from knowingly using it.

Who may be held liable?

📌 A physician or surgeon who issues a false medical certificate

For example, a doctor certifies that a person was examined and diagnosed with a particular illness even though no consultation or examination actually occurred.

Another example is when a physician intentionally states that a patient must rest for several days despite knowing that the patient has no such medical condition, merely to excuse the person from work, school, court attendance, or another obligation.

📌 A public officer who issues a false certificate of merit, service, good conduct, or similar circumstances

For example, a public officer issues a certificate stating that an individual rendered government service during a particular period, even though the person was never employed by or connected with the government office.

Another example is the issuance of a false certificate of good conduct to help an applicant qualify for employment, promotion, appointment, or another benefit.

📌 A private individual who falsifies any of these certificates

For example, an employee creates a fake medical certificate, copies a doctor’s signature, uses a clinic’s letterhead, or alters the date and diagnosis appearing on a genuine medical certificate to justify an absence.

A person may also be held liable for changing the number of recommended rest days from two days to two weeks or for making it appear that a certificate was issued by a physician who never prepared or signed it.

📌 Any person who knowingly uses a false certificate

For example, an employee submits a medical certificate to the employer despite knowing that it was fabricated or obtained without an actual medical examination.

Similarly, a student who knowingly submits a fake medical certificate to excuse an absence or missed examination may be held liable even if another person prepared the document.

A job applicant who knowingly presents a false certificate of employment, service, merit, or good conduct to support an application may likewise incur criminal liability.

For physicians, surgeons, and public officers covered by Article 174, the penalty may include imprisonment and a fine of up to ₱200,000, as adjusted by Republic Act No. 10951. A private person who falsifies such a certificate may also be imprisoned. Meanwhile, knowingly using the false certificate is separately punishable under Article 175.

The law therefore punishes three distinct acts:

1. Issuing a false certificate;
2. Falsifying a certificate; and
3. Knowingly using a false certificate.

The person who uses the certificate cannot automatically escape liability by claiming, “I was not the one who made it.” If the person knew that the certificate was false and still used it, Article 175 may apply.

However, knowledge is essential. A person who used a certificate without knowing that it was false is not in the same situation as someone who knowingly participated in or benefited from the deception.

Remember: A false certificate does not become valid simply because it bears a signature, stamp, license number, or official-looking letterhead.

09/08/2026

⚖️ CAN AN ILLEGITIMATE CHILD CHANGE HIS SURNAME FROM HIS FATHER’S TO HIS MOTHER’S?

In Republic v. Capote, G.R. No. 157043, February 2, 2007, the Supreme Court upheld the change of surname of a minor from “Giovanni N. Gallamaso,” his father’s surname, to “Giovanni Nadores,” his mother’s surname.

BRIEF FACTS:

Giovanni was an illegitimate child. Although he had been using his father’s surname since birth, his father had never recognized him and had failed to provide financial, physical, emotional, or spiritual support. Giovanni himself desired to use his mother’s surname. His guardian therefore filed a Petition for Change of Name under Rule 103.

The trial court granted the petition, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. The Republic challenged the ruling, arguing, among others, that the proceeding was not sufficiently adversarial.

SUPREME COURT RULING:

The Supreme Court DENIED the Republic’s petition and allowed the change of surname.

The Court emphasized that an illegitimate child generally uses the surname of the mother. Where the child’s filiation has not been recognized by the father, the child bears the mother’s surname.

In Giovanni’s case, the evidence established that his father had never recognized him, while his mother had always recognized him as her child. The Court held that changing his surname would remove the impression that he had been recognized by his father and would also serve his best interests.

📌 DOCTRINE:

A substantial change of a person’s surname is properly sought through a Petition for Change of Name under Rule 103 of the Rules of Court, not merely as a correction of an entry under Rule 108.

A Rule 103 proceeding must be adversarial. However, “adversarial” does not mean that someone must actually oppose the petition. It is sufficient that interested parties are given legal notice and an opportunity to contest it. Publication of the petition, together with notice to the OSG, satisfies this requirement. The absence of an opposition does not deprive the court of jurisdiction or make the proceeding non-adversarial.

Most importantly, Republic v. Capote recognizes that an illegitimate child who has not been recognized by the father may, upon compliance with Rule 103 and sufficient justification, be allowed to change from the father’s surname to the mother’s surname.

A surname is not merely a label—it is connected to a person’s identity, filiation, status, and even successional rights. For this reason, a change of surname requires judicial authority and observance of the proper procedure.

⚖️ Republic of the Philippines v. Trinidad R.A. Capote
G.R. No. 157043, February 2, 2007

06/08/2026

⚖️ WHEN DOES A JUDGMENT BECOME FINAL AND EXECUTORY?

A “final judgment” is not necessarily immediately enforceable.

A judgment is considered final when it completely disposes of the case and leaves nothing more for the court to decide regarding the parties’ rights and obligations. However, the losing party may still file a motion for reconsideration, motion for new trial, or appeal within the period provided by law.

A judgment becomes final and executory when:

✅ The period to appeal or seek reconsideration has expired; and
✅ No timely appeal, motion for reconsideration, or motion for new trial was filed.

As a general rule in ordinary civil cases, a party has fifteen (15) days from receipt of the judgment or final order within which to appeal. A timely motion for reconsideration or new trial interrupts this period. Once such motion is denied, the party ordinarily has a fresh period of fifteen (15) days from receipt of the denial within which to appeal, when the applicable rules so provide.

Example:

A party receives the court’s decision on August 1. The decision is already a final judgment because it completely resolves the case. However, it is not yet final and executory because the party may still appeal. If no proper motion or appeal is filed within the prescribed period, the judgment becomes final and executory by operation of law.

Once a judgment becomes final and executory, it generally becomes immutable and unalterable. Neither the court that rendered it nor even a higher court may ordinarily modify it. What remains is its enforcement or ex*****on.

In simple terms:

“Final judgment” means the court has finished deciding the case.

“Final and executory judgment” means the period to challenge the decision has ended, and it may now be enforced as a matter of right.

Finality relates to the completion of judicial determination; executory character relates to enforceability.

The Supreme Court has emphasized that a judgment becomes final and executory by operation of law upon the lapse of the reglementary period without a proper appeal being perfected. Rules of Court⁠ | Supreme Court ruling⁠

This discussion states the general rule. Different proceedings may have special periods or may be immediately executory by law or by the applicable rules.

05/08/2026

🏠 SUBLEASING: CAN A TENANT RENT OUT A PROPERTY THAT HE IS ONLY LEASING?

Subleasing occurs when a tenant rents out the whole or a portion of the leased property to another person. The original tenant becomes the sublessor, while the new occupant becomes the sublessee.

Under Article 1650 of the Civil Code, a tenant may sublease the property, in whole or in part, if the lease contract does not expressly prohibit it. However, if the contract states that subleasing requires the owner’s prior written consent, the tenant must first obtain such consent.

A tenant who subleases the property despite an express prohibition may be committing a material breach of the lease agreement. The owner may seek the termination or rescission of the lease, recovery of possession through the proper ejectment proceedings, and damages when legally justified.

Even after subleasing the property, the original tenant remains responsible to the owner. The tenant must continue paying rent, properly use and preserve the property, and comply with all the conditions of the original lease agreement. The sublessee may also be held responsible for acts involving the use and preservation of the property and, in certain cases, may be subsidiarily liable for unpaid rent.

Subleasing must also be distinguished from an assignment of lease. In a sublease, the original tenant remains a party to the lease agreement. In an assignment, the tenant transfers the leasehold rights to another person. Under Article 1649 of the Civil Code, an assignment generally requires the consent of the lessor unless the contract provides otherwise.

Practical reminder: Before subleasing a property, carefully review the lease agreement and obtain the owner’s written consent whenever required. Verbal permission may be difficult to prove when a dispute arises.

⚖️ Legal basis: Articles 1649–1652 and 1659 of the Civil Code of the Philippines.

This post is for general legal information only and does not constitute legal advice.

05/08/2026

⚖️ WHAT IS A PRIMA FACIE PRESUMPTION?

A prima facie presumption is a conclusion that the law initially accepts as true once certain basic facts have been established. However, it is not final or conclusive—it may still be overcome by sufficient evidence to the contrary.

In simple terms, the law is saying:

“Based on the facts presently shown, this is presumed true unless someone proves otherwise.”

For example, under B.P. Blg. 22, when a check is dishonored due to insufficient funds and the drawer fails to pay or make arrangements for full payment within five banking days from receipt of the notice of dishonor, the law creates a prima facie presumption that the drawer knew that the account lacked sufficient funds.

The drawer may still rebut the presumption by presenting credible evidence. Thus, a prima facie presumption shifts the burden of presenting evidence, but it does not automatically establish guilt. In criminal cases, the prosecution must still prove every element of the offense beyond reasonable doubt.

Simply put: presumed true at first—but still open to proof to the contrary.

📌 Every presumption has legal requirements. It cannot arise unless the facts required by law are first properly established.

Source: Supreme Court discussion on prima facie presumptions under B.P. Blg. 22⁠

This post is for general legal information only and is not a substitute for legal advice.

04/08/2026

🏠 REAL ESTATE MORTGAGE AND FORECLOSURE: WHAT PROPERTY OWNERS SHOULD KNOW

A real estate mortgage is a contract whereby land, a house, or another immovable property is used as security for the payment of a loan or obligation. The borrower remains the owner of the property, but the mortgage gives the creditor the right to cause its sale if the borrower defaults.

Failure to pay does not automatically make the creditor the owner. Article 2088 of the Civil Code prohibits the creditor from simply appropriating the mortgaged property. To enforce the mortgage, the creditor must undergo foreclosure and comply strictly with the requirements of law.

Foreclosure may be judicial or extrajudicial.

In judicial foreclosure, the creditor files a case in court under Rule 68 of the Rules of Court. If the court finds the debt due, it orders the borrower to pay within a period of not less than ninety (90) nor more than one hundred twenty (120) days from the entry of judgment. If payment is not made, the property may be sold at public auction. As a general rule, the borrower has an equity of redemption before the foreclosure sale is confirmed by the court.

In extrajudicial foreclosure, the creditor proceeds without filing an ordinary foreclosure case, provided that the mortgage contains a special power authorizing the sale. The procedure is principally governed by Act No. 3135 and requires proper notice, publication, and a public auction. As a general rule, the debtor may redeem the property within one (1) year from the registration of the certificate of sale. Different rules or shorter periods may apply to certain bank foreclosures and juridical mortgagors.

If the proceeds of the foreclosure sale exceed the debt and lawful expenses, the surplus must be returned to the mortgagor or other persons legally entitled to it. If the proceeds are insufficient, the creditor may, subject to the applicable law and the terms of the obligation, pursue the remaining deficiency.

Foreclosure has serious consequences, but both creditor and debtor have rights that must be respected. A defective notice, improper publication, unauthorized foreclosure, premature consolidation of title, or violation of the borrower’s redemption rights may provide legal grounds to challenge the proceedings.

Before signing a real estate mortgage—or upon receiving a demand letter, notice of foreclosure, or notice of auction—consult a lawyer immediately. In foreclosure cases, delay may result in the permanent loss of valuable property.

This post is for general legal information only and does not constitute legal advice for any particular case.

03/08/2026

THEFT vs. ROBBERY: WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE?

Both theft and robbery involve the unlawful taking of personal property belonging to another with intent to gain. The decisive difference is the manner by which the property is taken.

THEFT

Under Article 308 of the Revised Penal Code, theft is committed when a person takes the personal property of another, with intent to gain and without the owner’s consent, without using violence or intimidation against persons and without employing force upon things.

The elements of theft are:

1. There is a taking of personal property;
2. The property belongs to another;
3. The taking is done with intent to gain;
4. The taking is without the owner’s consent; and
5. The taking is accomplished without violence or intimidation against persons and without force upon things.

Example: A person secretly takes a cellphone left unattended on a restaurant table. Since the cellphone was taken without violence, intimidation, or force upon things, the crime is theft.

ROBBERY

Under Article 293 of the Revised Penal Code, robbery is committed when a person, with intent to gain, takes personal property belonging to another by means of violence against or intimidation of a person, or by using force upon things.

The elements of robbery are:

1. There is an unlawful taking of personal property;
2. The property belongs to another;
3. The taking is done with intent to gain; and
4. The taking is accomplished through violence or intimidation against a person, or through force upon things.

Example: If the offender points a knife at the victim and demands the victim’s cellphone, the crime is robbery because intimidation was employed. Likewise, if the offender breaks the lock of a closed store to take merchandise, the crime may be robbery because force upon things was used.

THE SIMPLE DISTINCTION

If the property is taken quietly and without violence, intimidation, or force upon things, it is generally theft.

If the taking is accomplished through violence, threats, intimidation, or force upon things, it is generally robbery.

It is not the value of the property that principally distinguishes theft from robbery. What controls is how the offender took the property.

Legal Basis: Articles 293 and 308, Revised Penal Code of the Philippines (Act No. 3815⁠).

This post is for general legal information and does not constitute legal advice for any particular case.

31/07/2026

SERIOUS, LESS SERIOUS, OR SLIGHT PHYSICAL INJURIES?

Not every physical injury is treated the same under Philippine law.

The Revised Penal Code classifies physical injuries into three main categories depending on the gravity of the injury and the period required for medical treatment or incapacity to work. This classification determines the criminal liability and the corresponding penalty.

SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES

A person commits Serious Physical Injuries when the injuries inflicted produce grave and lasting consequences, such as:

• The victim becomes insane, imbecile, impotent, or blind;
• The victim loses the use of speech, hearing, smell, an eye, a hand, a foot, an arm, or a leg;
• The victim loses the use of any of the foregoing organs or limbs;
• The victim becomes permanently incapacitated for work;
• The victim suffers a permanent deformity; or
• The victim becomes ill or incapacitated for labor for more than thirty (30) days.

Example:

During a fight, A strikes B with a metal pipe, causing B to lose the vision in one eye. Even if B survives, the permanent loss of sight makes A liable for Serious Physical Injuries.

LESS SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES

This offense is committed when the injuries cause the victim to be incapacitated for work or require medical attendance for more than ten (10) days but not more than thirty (30) days.

Example:

A punches B several times, fracturing B’s wrist. B requires treatment and cannot work for twenty (20) days before fully recovering. The injury falls under Less Serious Physical Injuries.

SLIGHT PHYSICAL INJURIES

This applies when:

• The victim is incapacitated for work or requires medical treatment for one (1) to nine (9) days;
• The injuries do not prevent the victim from working nor require medical attendance; or
• The act consists merely of ill-treatment without causing any actual injury.

Example:

A slaps B during an argument, leaving redness and minor swelling that disappears after a few days without significant treatment. Depending on the medical findings and the period of incapacity, A may be liable for Slight Physical Injuries.

WHY MEDICAL CERTIFICATES MATTER

In prosecutions for physical injuries, the Medico-Legal Certificate or Medical Certificate is often one of the most important pieces of evidence. It helps establish:

• The nature and extent of the injuries;
• The period of medical treatment;
• The duration of incapacity for work; and
• Whether the injuries fall under serious, less serious, or slight physical injuries.

The court does not determine the classification based solely on photographs or the appearance of the wounds. Competent medical evidence plays a crucial role.

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS

If you have been physically assaulted, seek immediate medical attention, preserve all medical records, take photographs of your injuries, identify possible witnesses, and promptly report the incident to the proper authorities. Early documentation not only protects your health but also strengthens any criminal case that may be filed.

The law does not measure violence by the number of blows inflicted. It measures it by the injury caused and its effect on the victim’s body and ability to work.

30/07/2026

MURDER AND HOMICIDE: WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE?

Not every unlawful killing is automatically considered murder.

Under Philippine law, both murder and homicide involve the intentional and unlawful killing of another person. The principal difference lies in the presence or absence of a qualifying circumstance specifically recognized by law.

HOMICIDE

Under Article 249 of the Revised Penal Code, homicide is committed when a person unlawfully kills another, provided that the killing is not parricide and is not attended by any of the qualifying circumstances that would make it murder.

The prosecution must generally establish that:

1. A person was killed;
2. The accused caused the victim’s death;
3. The accused intended to kill the victim; and
4. The killing was not attended by a circumstance that would qualify it as murder, parricide, or infanticide.

For example, during a heated confrontation, one person intentionally stabs another, causing the latter’s death. If the attack was not planned beforehand and was not carried out through treachery or any other qualifying circumstance, the crime may be homicide.

Homicide is punishable by reclusion temporal, which has a duration of twelve years and one day to twenty years. The actual penalty imposed will depend on the presence of mitigating or aggravating circumstances and the application of the Indeterminate Sentence Law.

MURDER

Under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code, murder is committed when a person unlawfully kills another and the killing is attended by at least one of the qualifying circumstances provided by law.

Among these circumstances are:

1. Treachery;
2. Taking advantage of superior strength;
3. Acting with the aid of armed men;
4. Employing means to weaken the victim’s defense or to ensure the offender’s escape or immunity;
5. Killing in consideration of a price, reward, or promise;
6. Using fire, poison, explosion, inundation, shipwreck, derailment, or another destructive means involving great waste and ruin;
7. Taking advantage of a calamity, such as an earthquake, volcanic eruption, destructive cyclone, epidemic, or other public calamity;
8. Evident premeditation; and
9. Cruelty, by deliberately and inhumanly increasing the victim’s suffering or by outraging or scoffing at the victim’s person or co**se.

Murder is punishable by reclusion perpetua. Although Article 248 still mentions the death penalty, the imposition of the death penalty is presently prohibited under Republic Act No. 9346.

WHAT IS TREACHERY?

Treachery, or alevosia, exists when the offender deliberately employs a method of attack that gives the victim no real opportunity to defend himself or herself and ensures the commission of the crime without risk to the offender arising from any defense the victim might make.

A classic example is when the victim is suddenly attacked from behind while completely unaware and defenseless.

However, a sudden attack does not automatically constitute treachery. The prosecution must prove that the manner of attack was consciously and deliberately adopted by the offender.

WHAT IS ABUSE OF SUPERIOR STRENGTH?

Abuse of superior strength exists when the offender purposely uses excessive force that is clearly disproportionate to the means of defense available to the victim.

For example, several armed persons may simultaneously attack one unarmed victim. Still, superiority in number alone does not automatically establish this circumstance. It must be shown that the offenders deliberately took advantage of their combined strength.

WHAT IS EVIDENT PREMEDITATION?

Evident premeditation means that the offender planned the killing and had sufficient time to reflect upon the consequences but nevertheless persisted in carrying out the plan.

The prosecution must establish:

1. When the offender decided to commit the crime;
2. An act showing that the offender remained determined to carry out the plan; and
3. A sufficient interval between the decision and the ex*****on of the crime, allowing the offender time to reflect.

Mere threats, anger, or previous disagreements do not automatically prove evident premeditation.

WHAT IS CRUELTY?

Cruelty exists when the offender deliberately causes additional suffering to the victim beyond what is necessary to cause death.

The additional injuries must have been inflicted while the victim was still alive. Injuries inflicted after death generally cannot constitute cruelty because the victim could no longer experience additional physical suffering. However, acts committed against the co**se may fall under the separate circumstance of outraging or scoffing at the victim’s person or co**se.

WHY IS THE DISTINCTION IMPORTANT?

The distinction affects the nature of the charge, the penalty, the prosecution’s required evidence, and the accused’s right to be properly informed of the accusation.

A qualifying circumstance cannot simply be presumed. It must be specifically alleged in the Information and proved beyond reasonable doubt during trial. It must be established with the same degree of certainty required to prove the killing itself.

Thus, even when the accused is proven to have killed the victim, the conviction may be reduced from murder to homicide if the prosecution fails to sufficiently allege or prove the qualifying circumstance.

NOT EVERY KILLING IS HOMICIDE OR MURDER

The relationship between the offender and the victim may result in a different crime.

If the victim is the offender’s father, mother, child, other direct ascendant or descendant, or spouse, the crime may be parricide under Article 246 of the Revised Penal Code.

The killing of a child less than three days old may constitute infanticide under Article 255.

A death caused by negligence, such as reckless driving without intent to kill, may constitute reckless imprudence resulting in homicide under Article 365, rather than intentional homicide.

A person may also avoid criminal liability if the killing was committed under a complete justifying circumstance, such as lawful self-defense, provided that all its legal requirements are established.

THE SIMPLE DISTINCTION

Homicide is the intentional and unlawful killing of another without any circumstance that legally qualifies the act as murder.

Murder is an intentional and unlawful killing attended by at least one qualifying circumstance under Article 248, such as treachery, evident premeditation, abuse of superior strength, or cruelty.

The brutality of a killing may influence public opinion, but criminal liability must always be determined according to the allegations, evidence, and specific requirements of the law.

Legal classification is not based on emotion or on the label initially used by the parties. It is based on what the prosecution properly alleges and proves beyond reasonable doubt.

Davao Lawyer and Notary Public

12/08/2026

11/08/2026

09/08/2026

06/08/2026

05/08/2026

05/08/2026

04/08/2026

03/08/2026

31/07/2026

30/07/2026

Address

Opening Hours

Website

Alerts

Contact The Practice

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request

Monday	8am - 5pm
Tuesday	8am - 5pm
Wednesday	8am - 5pm
Thursday	8am - 5am
Friday	8am - 5pm