05/09/2013
I heard you have restrained John, What are the facts in issue?”
“He instituted a relationship with me and instituted another one with another girl”
“No, that amounts to abuse of court process”
“The first time I suspected, I raised a preliminary objection”
“Did he respond?”
“He filed a counter and added an address formulating issues on when I receive calls from guys in his presence and all that, telling me that he who goes to equity goes with clean hands”
“That accusation lacks merit, what did you say?”
“I had to order a stay of the accusations to avoid joining issues with him”
“You should have read his charges for him by bringing a further and better deposition about his waywardness”
“No, there should be an end to litigation”
“What kind of restraining order did you give to him?”
“A perpetual injunction, I don’t want him near me again”
“Who put you on notice about his proceedings with the other girl?”
“I heard it from a friend who saw somebody that saw them”
“Hey! That is hearsay. You can’t rely on it. It is not admissible”
“Admissible or not, I will admit it”
“That will not amount to fair hearing. It will amount to miscarriage of justice”
“I have similar facts evidence; it was the same thing that broke his last relationship. Similar methodology”
“Did he depose to any statement before you gave your order this time?”
“Yes. What do you expect, he denied all my averments”
“Your friend that put you on notice, is she a credible witness?”
“Yes,why do you ask?”
“She might be telling lies. John might be innocent”
“Bisola!!”
“What!”
“Bisola!!”
“What!!”
“You are descending into the arena of conflict”
“Sorry o o o”