Legal Junction

Legal Junction where there is a law, ignorance of the law is not an excuse, the page aims at teaching everybody

Can a father refuse to leave anything to his child in a will?Yes, generally he can. Nigerian law allows a person to deci...
10/07/2026

Can a father refuse to leave anything to his child in a will?

Yes, generally he can. Nigerian law allows a person to decide who inherits their property after they die. This means a father can choose not to leave anything to one or more of his children.

However, this right is not unlimited. There are situations where a child or other dependent may challenge the will.

A child may have a case if:
• The will was not properly made or is invalid (for example, the father lacked mental capacity, was forced to make it, or the legal requirements for making a valid will were not followed).
• The child or another dependent was left without reasonable financial support. In some states, such as Lagos State, the court can order that reasonable maintenance be provided from the deceased’s estate. This does not automatically mean the child will receive an equal share of the inheritance.

There are also special rules under certain laws:
• Islamic law limits how much of a person’s estate can be distributed by will. Generally, only one-third can be freely given away, while the rest must be shared according to Islamic inheritance rules.
• Customary law may also prevent a person from giving away certain family or communal property that does not belong to them alone.

In summary: A father in Nigeria can generally choose to disinherit a child, but the decision is not always final. The will can be challenged if it is invalid or if the law allows a dependent to claim reasonable financial support from the estate.

Doctrine of Recent Possession under Nigerian LawThe doctrine of recent possession is a rule used in Nigerian criminal la...
04/05/2026

Doctrine of Recent Possession under Nigerian Law

The doctrine of recent possession is a rule used in Nigerian criminal law to help courts decide cases where stolen property is found with a person shortly after a theft has taken place. It is based on common sense and the idea that people do not usually come into possession of stolen items by coincidence, especially soon after they are stolen.

Under this doctrine, if a person is found with property that has been recently stolen and that person cannot give a reasonable explanation of how they got it, the court may assume that the person either stole it or knew it was stolen. This inference is not automatic punishment; it is simply a way for the court to draw a logical conclusion from the facts before it.

For the doctrine to apply, certain conditions must be present.

1. It must be clearly proven that the item was actually stolen.

2. The item must be found in the possession of the accused person.

3. The possession must be “recent,” meaning it happened shortly after the theft, depending on the nature of the item. For example, money or mobile phones may be considered recent within hours or days, while other items may take longer.

4. Finally, the accused person must fail to give a satisfactory explanation of how they came to possess the item.

For example, if a phone is stolen at night and the next afternoon or even some days later, it is found with someone who cannot explain how they got it, the court may presume that the person was involved in the theft. Another example is if a stolen item like a bicycle or laptop is found with someone shortly after it disappeared, and the person gives no credible explanation, the law may link them to the offence.

However, it is important to understand that this doctrine does not mean a person is automatically guilty. The accused still has the right to defend themselves and explain how they came into possession of the item. The court must still be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt before a conviction can be made.

In summary, the doctrine of recent possession simply means that when a person is found with stolen property shortly after it was stolen and cannot explain it properly, the law may assume involvement in the theft unless proven otherwise.

Address

Suite 23, Kasam Plaza
Ikotun Lagos

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Legal Junction posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Legal Junction:

Shortcuts

Share

Category