Phoenix Halls Attorneys

Phoenix Halls Attorneys Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Phoenix Halls Attorneys, Legal Service, Pinnacle 32, Jubilation Bethel Estate, Lokogoma, Abuja.

Phoenix Halls Attorneys are corporate law attorneys and consultants specializing in fundamental business & NGO formation ,Property and Real Estate,Copyrights, Trade Marks & Names, Patents & Designs, Immigration matters , telecommunications and more..

https://oal.law/machala-who-rightfully-owns-the-music/
08/10/2022

https://oal.law/machala-who-rightfully-owns-the-music/

Skit Maker Carter Efe teamed up with upcoming act Berri Tiga to release the very catchy song “Machala" produced by ‘X’ as a reference to the Nigerian superstar Wizkid, who is sometimes referred to by his fans as “Machala” on July 29, 2022. The song became an instant hit thanks to catchy ly...

21/09/2022
12/09/2022

Nigeria: Urgent Need For A Local Content Policy In The Aviation Industry In Nigeria
09 September 2022
by Collins Okeke and Mary-Cynthia Okundaye
Olisa Agbakoba Legal (OAL)
INTRODUCTION

Aviation is one of the most fascinating industries in the world. It is a means of transportation that connects people, cultures, and businesses across continents. It also facilitates international trade and promotes tourism. With more than 5000 airlines that operate over 25,578 aircraft at more than 41, 500 airports, the aviation industry supports 65.5 million jobs around the world and supports $2.7 trillion (3.6%) of the world's gross domestic product (GDP). If aviation were a country, it would rank 20th in size by GDP. That equates to the GDP of Switzerland or Argentina. Regrettably, the aviation industry in Nigeria is yet to contribute significantly to the country's economic growth. Despite the potential of the sector to create employment and spur the development of other industries such as hospitality and tourism, the aviation industry in Nigeria has one of the highest turnovers of registered domestic airlines in the world. It is also known for parading airlines with the shortest lifespan of 5 to 10 years. No fewer than 150 airlines were registered as of 2000. Only 28 survived till 2006. In 2007 alone, 7 air licenses were withdrawn by the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority. The situation is not fundamentally different today as most Nigerian airlines are struggling to stay afloat. A lot of factors have been advanced for the abysmal failure of Nigerian airlines but the most fundamental is the absence of a local content policy in the aviation industry in Nigeria.

Trending

Lawyers/Law Firms are Taxable Persons Liable to Pay VAT — Conclusions from Al-Masser vs. FIRS
AIR SERVICE AGREEMENTS

The Aviation industry in Nigeria as in other parts of the world is governed by air service agreements or treatises. Nigeria is a signatory to over 90 Bilateral Air Service Agreements (BASA). Bilateral Air Service Agreements ("BASAS") are treaties signed between countries to allow international commercial air transport services between territories. Nigeria also has an open skies treaty known as the Single African Air Transport Market with about 27 other member states of the African Union as well as other potential signatories. Most of these treaties are entered into without adequate consideration of their impact on the aviation industry in Nigeria. The result is that most air service agreements are skewed in favor of foreign airlines against Nigerian airlines. Currently, over 25 foreign airlines operate flights into Nigeria from multiple destinations. While only one Nigerian airline operates internationally. One or two Nigerian airlines operate on regional routes. Some have argued that the establishment of a national carrier would balance out Nigeria's air service agreements and other international obligations, however, the reality is that the national carrier would be subject to the same difficulties faced by private local airlines. As such, the focus should be on creating a more conducive business environment within which a national carrier and private airlines can thrive which is why a Nigerian Aviation local content policy is imperative.

Also read Developing a New National Space Policy for Nigeria
THE FLY NIGERIA Bill

The Fly Nigeria bill promoted by Olisa Agbakoba Legal (OAL) is the first real effort at developing a Nigerian Aviation local content policy. The Bill is similar to the Coastal and Inland Shipping (Cabotage) Act 2003 which opened up an N10 trillion local maritime economy. It is modelled after the Fly America Act of 1974. The Fly Nigeria Bill is designed to create an enabling legal and policy environment for indigenous airlines in Nigeria. It seeks to protect and give market share to Nigerian airlines. It prevents public funds from being ferried away by foreign airlines but plowed back into Nigerian airlines to generate employment, revenue, access to capital, foreign investment, career projection for core professionals, and most importantly ignite a dash for codeshare and alliance with Nigerian carriers.

The Fly Nigeria Bill essentially states that Nigerian carriers shall be used for all commercial foreign air travel of employees/property, dependents, consultants, contractors, and grantees when air travel is funded by the government. General provisions of the Bill require that Nigerian flag carriers be used regardless of added cost or travel time implications to the traveler. The Bill will apply to non-Nigerian nationals and non-Nigerian companies or their representatives both within Nigeria and ex-territorially.

The Bill provides a balance against some existing, largely obsolescent, and, in many cases, inequitable bilateral Nigerian/non-Nigerian Air Transport Agreements. The Bill also accepts Code Sharing (Airline Alliances) of flights by Nigerian and non-Nigerian flag carriers utilizing the equipment of the non-Nigerian flag carrier. If a Nigerian flag air carrier has the arrangement to provide passenger service in international air transportation on the aircraft of a non-Nigerian air carrier under a "code-share" arrangement, the ticket must identify the Nigerian Flag air carrier's designated code and flight number.

The bill also provides some exceptions to when a flight would be by a non-Nigerian carrier such as; if the total travel time is 10 hours or more; if the airport abroad is an interchange point, and use of a Nigerian carrier would require the traveler to wait six (6) hours or more to make a connection or would extend the total travel time six (6) hours or more and if travel by non-Nigerian carrier would eliminate two (2) or more aircraft changes en route. Further, for all short-distance travel of origin and destination, the use of a non-Nigerian carrier is permissible if the elapsed travel time on a scheduled flight from origin to destination airport by a non-Nigerian carrier is three (3) hours or less and service by Nigerian carrier would double the travel time. Other exceptions are emergencies, budget constraints, etc.
CONCLUSION

The Aviation industry in Nigeria needs an urgent boost to contribute to the country's economic transformation. A Nigerian Aviation local content policy articulated in the OAL Fly Nigeria Bill can provide the boost. If the Fly Nigeria Bill is adopted and passed, it will reserve commercial transportation of goods and services to airlines flying Nigerian flags and owned by Nigerians and ensure government spending on air travel (estimated to be over N100 Billion annually) originates and terminates with airlines flying Nigerian flags. The Fly Nigeria Bill will enable the government to recoup investments in the national carrier (which is about $300 million) and provide steady cargo, revenue, and passengers for Indigenous Airlines. It would also trigger an increase in the number of indigenous airline operators and that would no doubt create more jobs, develop premium manpower and encourage the establishment of aircraft maintenance facilities. It will create more air routes which would in turn facilitate tourism and trade, more travel agencies and hotels, etc. which would generate economic growth, provide more jobs, and increase revenues from taxes. Aviation policymakers should consider and embrace a Nigerian Aviation local content policy by adopting and passing the OAL Fly Nigeria Bill.

05/09/2022

A new music service with official albums, singles, videos, remixes, live performances and more for Android, iOS and desktop. It's all here.

30/08/2022

Nigeria: New Digital Money Lender Regulations In Nigeria: Some Legal Issues
26 August 2022
by Olubunmi Abayomi-Olukunle
Balogun Harold

Digital Money Lenders – Nigeria's consumer protection regulator, the FCCPC, recently published a Limited Interim Regulatory/Registration Framework for Digital Lending (“Regulation”)1 with the intent to regulate digital money lenders in Nigeria. The Regulation is a welcome decision. However, a number of legal and industry issues are thrown up. We discuss some of the issues below.

Can the FCCPC Legally Regulate Digital Money Lenders in Nigeria? There is some doubt here because, the BOFIA Act (which regulates Banks and fintechs) provides that the FCCPC Act shall not apply to any financial product or financial services licensed and regulated by the CBN. The BOFIA was enacted in 2020 and therefore supersedes the supremacy sections2 in sections 104, 105, and 106 of the FCCPC Act, which was enacted in 2018. The BOFIA supersedes the FCCPC Act because of a principle of law for interpreting laws in Nigeria which asserts that, the intention of lawmakers when they make a new law where one on the same subject matter exists, is to correct any inconsistencies in a previous law. For this reason, there is some doubt that the FCCPC can regulate digital lenders that are licensed by the CBN. More importantly, section 30 of the BOFIA 2020 empowers the Governor of the Central Bank to exclusively regulate consumer protection in the financial services sector. Evidently, the FCCPC can only possibly regulate digital lenders that are not licensed by the CBN ( i.e. unlicensed digital money lenders or digital money lenders using state-issued money lender license as regulatory cover).
The Scope of the Regulation: The Regulation, which essentially is a Form asking for a number of “KYC” questions appears to have some extraneous requests. In our view, the regulatory oversight that the FCCPC provides can only relate to consumer protection matters and not more. Accordingly, the legal basis for FCCPC's request for registration information such as, “source of funds” ( and a number of other such requests) from digital lenders, is questionable in our view and ought to be reviewed. In the same vein, asking digital companies to register with the FCCPC, suggests that there is some legal basis for FCCPC to mandate companies in other industries (discos, gencos, telcos, manufacturing companies, oil and gas companies etc) to register with the FCCPC for purposes of consumer protection. This is a difficult proposition to make and is worthy of judicial review.
Enact Digital Money Lenders Law: It is important to also note that, by design, money lender laws enacted by states are primarily consumer protection laws. Issues such as the maximum amount of interest rate chargeable, are regulated in the interest of consumers, across money lender laws. We think that the failures we are seeing in the digital lending industry in Nigeria are primarily, a reflection of the absence of money lender laws that are specific to Digital Money Lenders and also consistent with industry realities. At the time the traditional money lender laws were enacted, the primary regulatory object was to protect consumers from loan sharks. Today, there are others issues around how the personal data of a consumer is used , the ethics of debt recovery, buy-now-pay-later products, non-cash lending and so on. These issues need to be regulated as a matter of “interim” priority. This, in our view, is the immediate requirement of the industry. On the other hand, state governments may also to seek to enhance their competitiveness by promoting and legislating relevant digital money lender laws. However, it is useful to note that state governments can only regulate digital lending from a consumer protection standpoint, as they do not, in our view, have the constitutional power to regulate money lending from a prudential standpoint.

30/08/2022

Nigeria: Regulatory Update: Registration Of Digital Lending Companies With The Federal Competition And Consumer Protection Commission
29 August 2022
by Aderonke Alex-Adedipe and Eustace Aroh
Pavestones Legal
Introduction

In 2021, the National Information Development Technology Agency ("NITDA") issued a fine of 10 Million Naira against Soko Lending Company (a digital lending company) after receiving over 40 petitions on the abuse of personal data by the lending company.1 Due to the rising complaints about the abuse of customers' rights, the NITDA consequently collaborated with the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission ("FCCPC") for the protection of the rights of Consumers. The FCCPC had since then (together with the Inter-agency Joint Regulatory and Enforcement Task Force2) imposed and enforced several sanctions on digital lending companies for breach of consumer rights.

On August 18, 2022, the FCCPC issued the "Limited Interim Regulatory/Registration Framework and Guidelines for Digital Lending 2022" (the "Framework") further to its enabling Act3, which would allow the FCCPC regulate the digital lending space.
Who does the Framework apply to?

The Framework was issued and aimed at any company intending to carry on the business of digital lending in Nigeria.
Potential Conflict with the BOFIA 2020

Upon review of the Framework, it would appear that the Framework seeks to apply to all digital lending companies irrespective of their enabling license. In view of provisions of the Bank and Other Financial Institution Act 2020 ("BOFIA"), however, the intention of the FCCPC to regulate institutions licensed by the Central Bank of Nigeria ("CBN") conflicts with the provision of section 65 of the BOFIA. Specifically, section 65 restricts the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2019 (FCCPA)4 from applying to the services of banks and other financial institutions.
Provisions of the Framework

The Framework requires digital lending companies to apply to the FCCPC for registration by completing the FCCPC Interim Digital Lending Guidelines Form 001. The FCCPC will further request for specific information on the lending business of the company such as:

the name and contact address of the business in Nigeria;
The identity and nationality of the promoters, directors, nominee directors, secretaries, and key officials;
the source of funding including the nature of the instrument, identity, nationality and nature of business of the source;
any affiliations the lending company has with any company whether in Nigeria or abroad including parent companies, subsidiaries, associate companies etc;
the license authorizing the business;
a list of its digital application used in its operation;
the interest rate and applicable fees including the method of calculation.

The Framework also requires lending companies to prepare and submit the following documents together with their application for registration.

Incorporation documents.
An organogram showing its key officers.
Contact information of the staff authorised to accept correspondence.
Service level agreement with its service providers relating to operations.
Evidence of feedback and complaint mechanism.

The lending company is expected to appoint a representative who will relate with the FCCPC and act on behalf of the company.

Conclusion

Whilst the Framework is an interim instrument, the intention is to ensure that all digital lending companies are governed by a single regulatory regime in view of consumers' rights.

The Framework, however, does not provide clear rules for digital lending companies to comply with. It is expected that upon release of the final regulation, the rules of the FCCPC will be adequately spelt out and CBN licensed institutions will be exempted from the Framework.

16/08/2022

Nigeria: Data Privacy And The Nigeria Data Protection Regulation, 2019
15 August 2022
by Dayo Adu and Esther Randle
Famsville Solicitors
Your LinkedIn Connections
with the authors

In January, 2019, National Information Technology Development Agency ("NITDA") issued the Nigeria Data Protection Regulation 2019 (the "Regulation").

The Regulation applies to all transactions intended for the processing of Personal Data being conducted or intended to be conducted and natural persons residing in Nigeria or residing outside Nigeria who are citizens of Nigeria.

The Regulation shall not operate to deny any Nigerian or any natural person the privacy rights he is entitled to under any law, regulation, policy, or contract for the time being in force in Nigeria or any foreign jurisdiction.

This article seeks to highlight some provisions of the Regulation.

GOVERNING PRINCIPLES OF DATA PROCESSING

Personal data shall be :

collected and processed by specific, lawful, and legitimate purpose as consented to by a Data Subject i.e. owner of the data being collected and processed:
adequate, accurate, and respect dignity of the human person;
stored only for the period within which it is reasonably needed;
secured against all foreseeable hazards and breaches such as theft, cyberattack, viral attack, dissemination, manipulations of any kind, damaged by rain, fire, or exposure to other natural elements

Any person entrusted with the Personal Data of a Data Subject or who has the Personal Data of a Data Subject owes a duty of care to the said Data Subject and shall be accountable for his acts and omissions in respect of data processing.

LAWFUL PROCESSING

The data processing shall be lawful if at least one of the following applies:

the Data Subject has given consent to the processing of his or her Data for one or more specific purposes;
processing is necessary for the performance of a contract
processing is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which the controller is subject;
processing is necessary to protect the vital interests of the Data Subject or another natural person, and;
processing is necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest.

PROCURING CONSENT

No data shall be obtained except the specific purpose of collection is made known to the Data Subject.

The Consent of a Data Subject must be obtained without fraud, coercion, or undue influence that is, the data subject must be legally capable of giving consent.

Where the Data Subject's consent is given in writing, the request for consent shall be presented, in an intelligible and easily accessible form, using clear and plain language.

Also, the Data Subject shall be informed of his right and method to withdraw his consent at any given time. However, the withdrawal of consent shall not affect the lawfulness of processing based on consent before its withdrawal.

Any part of the declaration that constitutes an infringement of this Regulation shall not be binding on the Data Subject.

PUBLICITY AND CLARITY OF PRIVACY POLICY

Any medium through which Personal Data is being collected or processed shall display a simple and conspicuous privacy policy that the class of Data subject being targeted can understand.

The privacy policy shall in addition to any other relevant information contain what constitutes the Data Subject's consent; the description of collectible personal information; the purpose of collection of Personal Data; the technical methods used to collect and store personal information, cookies, JWT among others.

DATA SECURITY

Anyone involved in data processing or the control of data shall develop security measures to protect data. Such measures include but are not limited to protecting systems from hackers, setting up firewalls, storing data securely with access to specifically authorized individuals, and employing data encryption technologies.

THIRD-PARTY DATA PROCESSING CONTRACT

Data processing by a third party shall be governed by a written contract between the third party and the Data Controller

OBJECTIONS BY THE DATA SUBJECT

The right of a Data Subject to object to the processing of his data shall always be safeguarded. A Data Subject shall have the option to object to the processing of Personal Data relating to him which the Data Controller intends to process.

PENALTY FOR DEFAULT

Any person subject to this Regulation who is found to be in breach of the data privacy rights of any Data Subject shall be liable, in addition to any other criminal liability,

in the case of a Data Controller dealing with more than 10,000 Data Subjects, payment of the fine of 2% of Annual Gross Revenue of the preceding year or payment of the sum of 10 million Naira, whichever is greater;
in the case of a Data Controller dealing with less than 10,000 Data Subjects, payment of the fine of 1% of the Annual Gross Revenue of the preceding year or payment of the sum of 2 million Naira, whichever is greater.

ADMINISTRATIVE REDRESS PANEL

The Agency shall set up an Administrative Redress Panel to Investigate allegations of any breach of the provisions of the Regulation.

The Panel is empowered to Invite any party to respond to allegations made against it within seven days.

The Agency shall conclude the investigation and determination of appropriate redress within twenty-eight (28) working days.

CONCLUSION

Data Privacy and Protection are integral to securing the personal data of citizens. It is the responsibility of data controllers and data processors to secure data by ensuring adequate cyber and information security controls.

The NITDA Regulation constitutes is a laudable attempt by the Government to protect the personal data of citizens.

Address

Pinnacle 32, Jubilation Bethel Estate, Lokogoma
Abuja
234

Telephone

+2348033237578

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Phoenix Halls Attorneys posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Phoenix Halls Attorneys:

Share

Category