M/s Ishfaq Wani and Associates

M/s Ishfaq Wani and Associates advocates, solicitors, conciliators

29/10/2024

Landmark Judgements
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
V/S UMESH KUMAR SHARMA Spl Crl No 5373-5375/2020 Decided on 26/04/2023

Police need not file closure report under Section 173 CrPC in a case where FIR has been quashed by the High Court.

Follow for daily legal updates

29/10/2024

A Kerala court on Monday awarded life imprisonment to two accused in the infamous Thenkurissi honour killing case of 2020 in which a 27-year-old man was murdere

29/10/2024

The Kerala High Court recently pulled up the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) for passing orders in child custody matters based on moral grounds rather than in the

05/08/2024

Supreme Court sets aside order of Additional Sessions Judge Sopore and High Court of J & K in Ghulam Hassan Beigh Versus Mohd. Maqbool Magrey (2024) 1 SCC (Cri) 589

Discharge from offence of murder by considering POST MORTEM REPORT

"The trial court as well as the High Court got persuaded by the fact that the cause of death of the deceased as assigned in the post mortem report being the “cardio respiratory failure”, the same cannot be said to be having any nexus with the alleged assault that was laid on the deceased. Such approach of the trial court is not correct and cannot be countenanced in law. The post mortem report, by itself, does not constitute substantive evidence. Whether the “cardio respiratory failure” had any nexus with the incident in question would have to be determined on the basis of the oral evidence of the eye witnesses as well as the medical officer concerned i.e. the expert witness who may be examined by the Prosecution as one of its witnesses. To put it in other words, whether the cause of death has any nexus with the alleged assault on the deceased by the accused persons could have been determined only after the recording of oral evidence of the eye witnesses and the expert witness along with the other substantive evidence on record."

24/07/2024

“It is needless to point out that such conditions of marking presence at Police Station would invite many grievances which may also lead to abuse of human rights and may give a scope of false allegations which would lead to multiplicity of proceedings and unverified aspects. Many a times, the CCTV Footage would not be available to the Court to verify the aspect about the authenticity of the claims and counter claims,”

24/07/2024

The Supreme Court on Wednesday (July 24) stated that the authorities should ensure the rehabilitation of people before evicting them to secure land for the development of Haldwani railway station in Uttarakhand.

Link in comment box

24/07/2024

Prosecution failing to explain reasons for not examining independent witnesses raises grave doubt in NDPS cases

Justice Atul Shreedharan in Daljeet Singh versus UT of J & K Crl A(S) 12/2023 decided on 02.07.2024

"Manohar Lal was one of the witnesses to the seizure memo was not examined by the prosecution and has been dropped. Manohar Lal is also an important witness as to why the independent witnesses from the locality were
not involved in the investigation as it was Manohar Lal who allegedly went to call the shopkeepers in the vicinity to join the
investigation which the shopkeepers refused. The information to this effect been given by Surinder Singh and other witnesses are hearsay based upon the information given by the Manohar Lal. The absence of any credible reason by the prosecution for dropping Manohar Lal also raises a grave doubt that had he been examined, he may have stated
contrary to the prosecution’s case and may have denied that he ever went and asked the shopkeepers to join investigation in this case."

29/06/2024

The single judge bench of the Jharkhand High Court held that for the purpose of Section 498-A IPC is to be established it should be determined by considering the conduct of the man, weighing the gravity or seriousness of his acts, and finding out as to whether it is likely to drive the women to comm...

29/06/2024

𝐈𝐬 𝐜𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚?

For further information, refer to this Article By SoOLEGAL (https://bit.ly/3Yehb3v).

19/10/2023

The Supreme Court recently held that when notice is returned as ‘unclaimed’, it shall be deemed t

Address

JAMMU & KASHMIR HIGH Court SRINAGAR
Srinagar

Telephone

+919906163703

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when M/s Ishfaq Wani and Associates posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to M/s Ishfaq Wani and Associates:

Share