Law School Policy Review

Law School Policy Review LSPR is an online Law and Policy platform run by a group of students from the National Law School of

Dear all,We have been informed that the submission form for our Blog Symposium on the Transgender Persons (Amendment) Ac...
07/08/2026

Dear all,

We have been informed that the submission form for our Blog Symposium on the Transgender Persons (Amendment) Act was not functioning properly. We apologise for the inconvenience.

The issue with the form is now resolved, and the deadline has been extended to August 15, 2026. If you tried to submit and faced issues, please resubmit using the link to the form on the LSPR website.

We continue to invite submissions engaging with, but not limited to:
— Constitutionality of the Amendment Act
— Comparative frameworks on transgender rights
— Tensions between legislative action and judicial precedent
— Administrative challenges in welfare delivery
— Intersectional analysis across caste, class, disability, and religion

Word limit: 1,800–2,500 words
Deadline: August 15, 2026

Submission guidelines are available on the LSPR website!

The article analyses the critical gap in accessibility of mental health facilities in prisons, which violates Article 21...
07/08/2026

The article analyses the critical gap in accessibility of mental health facilities in prisons, which violates Article 21 of the Constitution under contemporary judicial precedents. The article proposes a uniform national framework enacted via Article 253 of the Constitution to implement strict mental health benchmarks, considering India’s international and domestic obligations.

Permalink: https://lawschoolpolicyreview.com/2026/07/17/bars-within-bars-sukdeb-saha-article-253-and-the-crisis-of-carceral-mental-healthcare-in-india/

For accessible link, visit linktree in bio.

Subscribe to our email newsletter for the latest update on law and policy, delivered straight to your inbox!

*Call for Contributions: Mini-Symposium on ANI v OpenAI*The ongoing copyright litigation between Asian News Internationa...
06/08/2026

*Call for Contributions: Mini-Symposium on ANI v OpenAI*

The ongoing copyright litigation between Asian News International (ANI) and OpenAI raises broader questions that are not just limited to the immediate dispute but extend to matters that sit at the intersection of copyright law, generative AI, journalism, media regulation, and innovation.

The litigation is still ongoing, and a final judgment is yet to be delivered. This creates an opportunity to engage with the issues it raises without going into the question of predicting the Court’s eventual decision.

This Mini-Symposium will use the litigation as a starting point for a broader policy conversation, focusing on the questions the case has brought to the forefront on the tension between generative AI and copyright.

Contributions should be short and policy-focused. *A suggested length of 1,500–2,500 words* will allow authors to develop a substantive argument while keeping the pieces accessible.

Authors are not asked to predict the outcome of ANI v OpenAI, nor should pieces simply summarise the litigation. Instead, each contribution *should identify a broader problem raised by the case, explain why that problem is relevant, and advance a position on how courts, policymakers, industry actors, or other institutions should respond. The emphasis, therefore, should be on policy analysis rather than case commentary.*

One contribution from the open call may be selected as the *Featured Piece of the Mini-Symposium*. The Featured Piece will remain prominently displayed on our website for two weeks after publication and may also receive additional promotion through our social media channels. Selection will be based on *originality, analytical rigour, policy relevance, and clarity*.

Further details and submission guidelines are available via the link in our bio.

PolicyAnalysis Journalism LegalScholarship

This piece assesses two key changes brought to §7 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 by the 202...
06/08/2026

This piece assesses two key changes brought to §7 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 by the 2026 amendment: an obligation to register for a transgender identity certificate post-medical procedures, and, removal of rights and entitlements for such persons. The author argues these amendments are violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution, and liable to be struck down.

Permalink: https://lawschoolpolicyreview.com/2026/07/13/third-gender-where-art-thou-the-transgender-amendment-act-unconstitutionality-in-plain-sight/

For accessible link, visit linktree in bio.

Subscribe to our email newsletter for the latest update on law and policy, delivered straight to your inbox!

This article examines whether a system that continues to rely on informal structures can remain commercially sustainable...
05/08/2026

This article examines whether a system that continues to rely on informal structures can remain commercially sustainable and respond to the evolving demands of the modern legal services market. It advocates for structural reforms focused on greater formalisation and professionalisation as essential mechanisms for the growth of the profession in India.

Permalink: https://lawschoolpolicyreview.com/2026/06/13/raising-the-bar-regulating-litigating-lawyers-in-the-modern-world/

For accessible link, visit linktree in bio.

Subscribe to our email newsletter for the latest update on law and policy, delivered straight to your inbox!

The Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025, suggests automatic termination of the ministerial off...
04/08/2026

The Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025, suggests automatic termination of the ministerial office after thirty days of continuous detention for an offence punishable by five years or more. It is argued that the Bill violates the principles of the original constitution: it predetermines guilt by executive detention, thus abolishing the presumption of innocence; it substitutes the prerogative of the legislature to test executive confidence with a police-driven mechanism, which in effect is a negation of the power of the parliament through the established common law established in the case of S.R.Bommai; and it encroaches on the prerogatives of the executive that are vested on the Prime Minister and Chief Minister under Articles 75(2) and 164(1). By relying on the documents of the Debates of the Constituent Assembly, the author proves that the so-called constitutional gap that the Bill was supposed to address actually was a deliberate decision of the framers. Besides, placing the Bill in the modern enforcement context where the Enforcement Directorate has convicted only 0.69 per cent of its 8,391 registered cases, the article hypothesises that the Bill essentially codifies the process as punishment whereby investigative action has been transformed into a vehicle of dissolution of democratically elected governments.

Permalink: https://lawschoolpolicyreview.com/2026/05/18/the-130th-amendment-bill-and-its-threat-to-constitutional-order-in-a-democracy/

For accessible link, visit linktree in bio.

Subscribe to our email newsletter for the latest update on law and policy, delivered straight to your inbox!

For a large portion of the workers in India, the statutory minimum wage remains an unsustainable ₹176 per day, with the ...
03/08/2026

For a large portion of the workers in India, the statutory minimum wage remains an unsustainable ₹176 per day, with the national wage floor unchanged since 2017. While this figure is itself inadequate for a decent standard of living, the problem is compounded by the manner in which overtime compensation has been linked to the minimum wage framework in India as per the judicial interpretation of Section 14 of the Minimum Wages Act. The courts had interpreted the provision to provide minimum wages to only those who are earning equivalent to minimum wages, with this position being upheld in a recent 2024 judgment as well. However, there has beena legislative shift in Section 14 of the Code of Wages, 2019 by stipulating overtime to be double the “normal wages”. The Paper examines the contradicting legal positionin regard to Section 14 of the MWA, in light of the legislative change to overtime framework in India. Further, it gives recommendations for an improved overtime compensation system in India.

Permalink: https://lawschoolpolicyreview.com/2026/05/18/from-the-minimum-wages-act-to-the-code-on-wages-rethinking-overtime-compensation-in-india/

For accessible link, visit linktree in bio.

Subscribe to our email newsletter for the latest update on law and policy, delivered straight to your inbox!

This article critiques the Supreme Court’s ruling in Baboo Khan v. State of Rajasthan, where a dowry death conviction wa...
28/07/2026

This article critiques the Supreme Court’s ruling in Baboo Khan v. State of Rajasthan, where a dowry death conviction was overturned on the grounds that a demand made during a post-childbirth ceremony fell outside the legal definition of dowry. The author argues that the Court misread prior precedent, ignored established burden of proof frameworks, and adopted an unduly narrow interpretation of the law, one that undermines decades of judicial effort to protect women from dowry-related abuse.

Permalink: https://lawschoolpolicyreview.com/2026/05/15/revisiting-in-connection-with-the-marriage-time-for-a-liberal-reading-of-dowry/

For accessible link, visit linktree in bio.

Subscribe to our email newsletter for the latest update on law and policy, delivered straight to your inbox!

Dear all,We are pleased to share that following tremendous response by authors, the deadline for submissions to the Blog...
22/07/2026

Dear all,

We are pleased to share that following tremendous response by authors, the deadline for submissions to the Blog Symposium on the Transgender Persons (Amendment) Act has been extended to 31 July, 2026.

The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026 proposes significant changes to how transgender identity is legally defined, introduces new criminal offences, and reshapes the documentation requirements that determine access to welfare. The constitutional questions are important, but they are not the only questions we must ask.

We invite submissions engaging with, but not limited to:
— Constitutionality of the Amendment Act
— Comparative frameworks on transgender rights
— Tensions between legislative action and judicial precedent
— Administrative challenges in welfare delivery
— Intersectional analysis across caste, class, disability, and religion

Word limit: 1,800–2,500 words
Deadline: July 31, 2026

Submission guidelines are available on the LSPR website!

This article examines the application of intermediary liability to artificial intelligence under India’s 2026 IT Rules (...
17/05/2026

This article examines the application of intermediary liability to artificial intelligence under India’s 2026 IT Rules (as part of the latest Amendment Rules). It analyses Section 2(1)(w) of the IT Act as a function-specific definition anchored to activities performed in relation to pre-existing electronic records. While certain AI services may align with this framework, generative systems such as chatbots present interpretive challenges. By extending the intermediary framework to AI-enabled activities, the Amendment Rules raise questions regarding the scope of safe harbour protections. The article adopts a functional approach to distinguish between different modes of AI integration within existing legal structures.

Permalink: https://lawschoolpolicyreview.com/2026/05/13/artificial-intelligence-under-indias-it-rules-intermediary-liability-and-the-limits-of-safe-harbour/

For accessible link, visit linktree in bio.

Subscribe to our email newsletter for the latest update on law and policy, delivered straight to your inbox!

Address

Bangalore

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Law School Policy Review posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Law School Policy Review:

Shortcuts

Share