Ikon Law Solicitors & Advocates

29/01/2020

29/12/2019

Was the UK Supreme Court ruling that prorogation of parliament was “unlawful” a distort of law to reach the result the SC Judges wanted to achieve?

Have the judges substituted their own view of what is right for the view of parliament and of ministers?

Were the judges invited by parliament under the Human Rights Act to “enter the political arena”, including by considering whether “measures that parliament had taken to deal with a particular problem were proportionate to the objectives they wanted to achieve”?

Have the above two things led to a significant increase in the power of the judges at the expense of parliament and indeed government … Is it true that in order to reach the result they want to achieve, they … distort the meaning of the act of parliament of which they are interpreting.?

Was prorogation a decision of parliament, it did not amount to a proceeding, or was it clearly, of any ordinary view of the language, a proceeding in parliament? - This simple interpretational difference make all the difference.

Shall the merit based appointments of judges are needed to be replaced by a US style appointments?

18/12/2019

Lawsuit claims Smith & Wesson created ‘ultra-hazardous product’ and delayed technology that prevents unauthorized users from firing the weapon

11/01/2019

Women succeed in action over ‘fundamental problem’ with universal credit

10/01/2019

Conservatives have been spitting blood over Speaker’s decision to allow Grieve amendment