18/10/2026
ETA decision highlights the complexity of agency working arrangements.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal handed down its decision in Nagra v Unipart Group Ltd on 13 October 2026. The case involved a worker supplied through a recruitment agency under a three-party working arrangement and considered issues around employment status and potential liability under the Equality Act. The EAT dismissed the appeal.
https://www.gov.uk/employment-appeal-tribunal-decisions/mr-t-nagra-v-unipart-group-ltd-2026-eat-157
The case is not a landmark decision, but it is a useful reminder of how complicated agency arrangements can become. There may be: an agency, a worker, a hirer, a client organisation, different contracts, responsibilities or statutory rights.
The contractual label matters, but employers and hirers also need to understand how the arrangement actually operates. And they should seriously ask these questions: “Who engages the worker? Who pays them? Who controls the work? Who gives instructions? Who is responsible for workplace treatment? What rights apply to the individual? Agency labour can provide valuable flexibility.”. However, flexibility does not mean the legal relationships should be unclear. If several organisations are involved in supplying one person's work, everybody should understand where their responsibilities begin and end.
Affordable Support can help.
Affordable Support provides HR and Mediation services for SMEs and individuals. Two distinct services that can complement each other.
Clear guidance | Practical process | Commercial understanding.